Comments on: An Historic Look At The NBA Finals’ 2-3-2 Format

By: Drew

Drew — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:33:22 +0000

Imagine though, an LA-Miami series that went to game 7. FIVE cross country flights? 3 within 5-7 days?? 2-3-2 isn’t the best, but logistically its makes some sense.

By: John Crowson

John Crowson — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:13:20 +0000

I thoroughly enjoyed your totality in analyzing the championship series for the NBA. I have never heard anything close to your analysis. Keep up the good work.
The idea of 2-2-1-1-1 is so much better for both teams, in my opinion. You use the system for all series except the important series. I definitely think it should go back to the old system. I can’t imagine what the Thunder will do with future maturation on such a young team. Thanks again for the wonderful summation you have given.

By: Eddie

Eddie — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:39:08 +0000

This format is terrible, why would the schedule change only in the finals? stern is a joke! I wrote an article about the heat and the thunder and why the heat will win as well as how to bet it here http://nbawagers.com/2012/06/which-team-will-win-the-pivotal-game-3/

By: Ben

Ben — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:23:28 +0000

Like the history, like the matchups, and the likeness to other series. Like always, DM Nuggets for the best insight on the Thunder.