The Desire for DeJuan Blair
I received an e-mail this afternoon from a fan who, like many Thunder fans, is wondering why OKC didn’t draft DeJuan Blair instead of Byron Mullens. In this e-mail, the author talks about how every explanation he’s heard about why the Thunder and other teams passed on Blair was because of his well-documented knee concerns.
But the writer goes on to question how much risk really was involved if all it cost the Thunder was a second-round pick after Blair fell out of the first round. Then, the e-mailer pens one of the best lines I’ve read since the Thunder relocated:
San Antonio got a steal and the Thunder got stomped in this matter. The glaring weakness for the Thunder this year has been a constant lack of rebounding, and Blair would have been the answer to this deficiency. We could have had Wes Unseld but instead we have Steve Stipanovich.”
I can’t honestly say I was familiar with the career feats (or lack thereof) of Stipanovich until looking him up. And I have no idea whether Mullens will prove to be Stipanovich, Swift, Schintzius or Smits. But one thing we definitely ought not to do is declare Blair the second coming of Unseld.
Blair can ball, no doubt. He’s a beast on the block and a bully on the boards. His 28-point, 21-rebound performance Wednesday night against the Thunder marked only the fifth time since 1992-93 that a rookie has posted a 20-20 game and the first time since his teammate, Tim Duncan, did it in March of ’98. Shaquille O’Neal, Alonzo Mourning and Joe Smith are the other three.
But Blair might not have been a good fit on the Thunder. Sure, that might sound silly after seeing him slay the Thunder on Wednesday night. The thing to remember, though, is the Thunder is building for the long haul. In San Antonio, Blair is cheap production off the bench for a Spurs team that is a championship contender as currently constructed. In Oklahoma City, the outlook is for five, six years down the line.
The Thunder didn’t have a second-round pick in 2009, but I certainly can’t argue with anyone’s logic if they reason that OKC should have sent cash to any team drafting early in the second immediately when Blair slipped out of the first 30 picks. Cash-strapped teams like Washington, Portland and Denver, drafting 32nd, 33rd and 34th, respectively, all ahead of San Antonio at 37, certainly would have listened.
But the draft, as we all know, is based on potential. Are we to assume Blair has more upside than Mullens? The Thunder might have made the right call in passing on Blair. OKC might have blown it. Only time will tell. But where will Blair be when Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden and Jeff Green are hitting their strides five years from now? How will those knees, with their missing ACLs, have held up? Will Blair still be the same outstanding dirty worker or just an ordinary 25-year-old with no lift?
Strange, though, that the e-mailer cited Stipanovich. My quickie research informed me that he was the second overall pick behind Ralph Sampson in 1983. He played five fairly productive seasons before, of all things, knee injuries derailed his career.
Suppose the Spurs drafted Stipanovich?
-DM-
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
Besides, Mullens is a 1st-round draft pick, not the 2nd. And Dave, you are wrong; Mullens has way more upside than Blair. Mullens was the #1 player out of high school, and all of you can see his limited potential (via Scott Brooks’ steadfast 9-man rotation). By the end of his rookie contract, you will see the Thunder made the correct decision.
i hate it when fans play the ‘why didn’t we draft’ game.. c’mon, there are 29 other teams that could be saying the same thing.. Presti has been a genius with his picks, but we can’t expect him to be a fortune teller and know exactly how every single rookie prospect is going to play.. Harden was a great pick and Mullens looks like he has much upside, period.. there was a reason why Blair fell to the middle of the second round– everyone was afraid to take him because of his knees, and he is vastly undersized (speaking height here) for his position.. so he had one fantastic game against us, now we should all be gnashing our teeth because we didn’t take him? sheesh, people..
[...] Darnell Mayberry thinking about DeJuan Blair: “But the draft, as we all know, is based on potential. Are we to assume Blair has more upside than Mullens? The Thunder might have made the right call in passing on Blair. OKC might have blown it. Only time will tell. But where will Blair be when Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden and Jeff Green are hitting their strides five years from now? How will those knees, with their missing ACLs, have held up? Will Blair still be the same outstanding dirty worker or just an ordinary 25-year-old with no lift?” [...]
I am a Pitt Fan, thus a Blair fan. I saw him battle some of the best big men in the country playing in the Big East. Dominated them, like he will in the NBA. Time will tell, potential is just that, ask Ralph Sampson and Greg Oden. Seemed like the right pick at the time, not sure it was. If was easy to pick players, then all the NBA teams would be winners, they are not. Good management is the secret for good drafts and good teams. Blair is a good fit for the Spurs, excellent mentor in Duncan and a great coach. Go Spurs!
Portland cash strapped? Wow you are well informed. Paul Allen sure is struggling nowadays, only gave out 145 million in extensions this summer….cheapskate.
blue lotus extract pill effect lsd tabs for sale legal coke any good party powders new orleans party pills extreme sunrise buy legal powder legal party pills synthetic angel dust price dream incense reviews legal highs china white night legal highs ecstasy in canada strongest salvia divinorum safe marijuana alternative buy spice gold spain buy legal high bath salts heroin camden drug exotic party pills reviews legal smoking herbs edmonton buy legal bud in nyc buy hypnotic herbs legal high shops in runcorn legal buds skunk smoking marijuana in rome buy magic mushrooms australia
Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is magnificent blog. A great read. I’ll certainly be back.
I was dumbfounded when we didn’t draft Blair. Then even more confused with the french pick and trade for Mullens. I’ve read all over the web that Mullens was a stiff and mechanical. Yet, I’m pleasantly surprised with his size and athleticism. How many big men are that athletic with a soft touch around the basket? I say give Mullens a couple years and he COULD develop a Notwitski type game.