Comments on: Blazers 107, Thunder 72 http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/04/03/blazers-107-thunder-72/ Oklahoma City Thunder News, Photos, Blogs, Videos and more Thu, 02 May 2013 15:06:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 By: CB http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/04/03/blazers-107-thunder-72/comment-page-1/#comment-2201 CB Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:19:30 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/nbainokc/?p=601#comment-2201 I’d just like to know who has stopped Brandon Roy this year? That’s the most puzzling part of Bucher’s comments — along with the fact the Thunder can’t come close to matching Portland’s size.

]]> By: Chris Landon http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/04/03/blazers-107-thunder-72/comment-page-1/#comment-2200 Chris Landon Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:46:38 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/nbainokc/?p=601#comment-2200 Boy, I sure am glad to hear that the Thunder have a brighter long-term future than the blazers because they:

a) are more experienced (the Blazers are younger)
b) have a superstar to build around (and the Blazers only have Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge)
c) have a better big three (Roy/Aldridge/and Oden-Blake-Pryz-Outlaw-Fernandez just don’t stack up)
d) have a real PG (because Blake never shows up)

I think Bucher is an idiot. These Blazers are a younger squad, are blowing teams out, have size throughout and have a really deep bench (and Martell Webster has played only 5 minutes all year). I hope the Thunder don’t let that silly article go to their heads as last night proved there is a LONG way to go to close the gap.

]]>