<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clippers 107, Thunder 104</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/01/24/clippers-107-thunder-104/feed/?skip_red=True" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/01/24/clippers-107-thunder-104/</link>
	<description>Oklahoma City Thunder News, Photos, Blogs, Videos and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/01/24/clippers-107-thunder-104/comment-page-1/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/nbainokc/2009/01/24/clippers-107-thunder-104/#comment-2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice one Gregg, you really got us. You&#039;ve had, what, one winning season in the last fifteen? OKC is in their first year in a new city, new coach, youngest lineup in the NBA, hmmmmmmmmm. Losing by 3 on the road isn&#039;t so bad. Plus you had to shoot 60% from 3 just to pull it out.

In more positive news, let&#039;s get Weaver as much PT as he can handle.  I was a little surprised not to see him on Gordon, at least since Coach was trying a bunch of different guys. According to ESPN&#039;s +/- he was the most useful player (+4), not that that means a whole lot.  He also would be projected into a triple double if he played the whole game, having half of one in 23 minutes (8 points, 5 boards and 5 assists), also only one turnover and two fouls. I&#039;d like to see him get as many minutes as possible, though I suppose the rookie can&#039;t complain about 20.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Gregg, you really got us. You&#8217;ve had, what, one winning season in the last fifteen? OKC is in their first year in a new city, new coach, youngest lineup in the NBA, hmmmmmmmmm. Losing by 3 on the road isn&#8217;t so bad. Plus you had to shoot 60% from 3 just to pull it out.</p>
<p>In more positive news, let&#8217;s get Weaver as much PT as he can handle.  I was a little surprised not to see him on Gordon, at least since Coach was trying a bunch of different guys. According to ESPN&#8217;s +/- he was the most useful player (+4), not that that means a whole lot.  He also would be projected into a triple double if he played the whole game, having half of one in 23 minutes (8 points, 5 boards and 5 assists), also only one turnover and two fouls. I&#8217;d like to see him get as many minutes as possible, though I suppose the rookie can&#8217;t complain about 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/01/24/clippers-107-thunder-104/comment-page-1/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/nbainokc/2009/01/24/clippers-107-thunder-104/#comment-2050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a sorry team you have there in OKC can&#039;t even beat a injury riddled Clipper team.Blunder have now become the new laughing stock of the NBA surpassing the Clippers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a sorry team you have there in OKC can&#8217;t even beat a injury riddled Clipper team.Blunder have now become the new laughing stock of the NBA surpassing the Clippers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
