<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trailer: &#8220;Funny People&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/2009/03/05/trailer-funny-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/2009/03/05/trailer-funny-people/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s George Lang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: staticblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/2009/03/05/trailer-funny-people/comment-page-1/#comment-9402</link>
		<dc:creator>staticblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/2009/03/05/trailer-funny-people/#comment-9402</guid>
		<description>Well, as far as the giveaway trailer goes, it&#039;s generally the most egregious thing a studio can do artistically. My guess is that an unnamed pinhead at one of the studios made the persuasive argument that people want to know what they&#039;re getting -- they don&#039;t want to sit through &quot;Pay It Forward&quot; and then get shocked when America&#039;s Favorite Child Actor Circa 2000 gets whacked. They want to know what they&#039;re buying.

Sorry if that spoiled it for anyone, by the way. Or maybe I&#039;m not.  

As for this particular film, I think of the Apatow films as being sort of &quot;trailer&quot;-proof. They are experiences rather than plot-heavy stories with Shyamalan Twists. Yeah, I know a little too much now, but it doesn&#039;t dissuade me from wanting to see it. 

BTW, the very Apatowy &quot;I Love You, Man&quot; is extremely and consistently funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as far as the giveaway trailer goes, it&#8217;s generally the most egregious thing a studio can do artistically. My guess is that an unnamed pinhead at one of the studios made the persuasive argument that people want to know what they&#8217;re getting &#8212; they don&#8217;t want to sit through &#8220;Pay It Forward&#8221; and then get shocked when America&#8217;s Favorite Child Actor Circa 2000 gets whacked. They want to know what they&#8217;re buying.</p>
<p>Sorry if that spoiled it for anyone, by the way. Or maybe I&#8217;m not.  </p>
<p>As for this particular film, I think of the Apatow films as being sort of &#8220;trailer&#8221;-proof. They are experiences rather than plot-heavy stories with Shyamalan Twists. Yeah, I know a little too much now, but it doesn&#8217;t dissuade me from wanting to see it. </p>
<p>BTW, the very Apatowy &#8220;I Love You, Man&#8221; is extremely and consistently funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/2009/03/05/trailer-funny-people/comment-page-1/#comment-9400</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/2009/03/05/trailer-funny-people/#comment-9400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for the guy branching out - he&#039;s always had a decent sentimental streak to him, anyway - but what is with trailers that give away the ENTIRE movie? I feel like I&#039;ve already watched &quot;Funny People&quot; now. 

By the way, do you think this and &quot;Funny Games&quot; would be a suitable double bill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for the guy branching out &#8211; he&#8217;s always had a decent sentimental streak to him, anyway &#8211; but what is with trailers that give away the ENTIRE movie? I feel like I&#8217;ve already watched &#8220;Funny People&#8221; now. </p>
<p>By the way, do you think this and &#8220;Funny Games&#8221; would be a suitable double bill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

