Either/Or, Episode 10: Pundits

In Either/Or, we take two people in similar pursuits, and you choose between them. It can be based on any criteria: professional ability, personality, intellectual prowess, physical pulchritude, or who you’d want backing you up in a knife fight. It really doesn’t matter: just choose Either/Or.

Either Michelle Bernard of the Independent Women’s Forum…

Michelle Bernard Hardball Countdown Rachel Maddow MSNBC

Or Ana Marie Cox of Time.com and RADAR.

Ana Marie Cox Wonkette Radar Time.com Rachel Maddow MSNBC Sexy Pundit

Either Chris Cillizza of washingtonpost.com…

Chris Cillizza Hardball Countdown washington post MSNBC

Or Ryan Lizza of the New Yorker.

Ryan Lizza Pundit New Yorker MSNBC Hardball Countdown

Categorized under:

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

I’d have to say Bernard, simply because she doesn’t cut McCain the sort of slack that Ana Marie Cox does. But then again, Cox gets major kudos for having helped make Wonkette the site it is. Plus, she’s a redhead. Oh, what the hell- I vote for both! It’s an election year.

Lizza is a decent writer, but he had a big blind spot (or was just towing the company line) during the controversy over the New Yorker Obama cover. So I vote for the guy with glasses. Plus, he has glasses. Hooray!

Wonkette in a DC second.

I’m not as familiar with the guys, but Chris Cillizza reminds me of Penn Jillette, so I’ll go with Lizza. His name is more efficient.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)