SoonerVote NewsOK.com Blogging Community

By Chad Taylor

With all this talk about this being the most important election ever, it makes me wonder… Is it really?

I think not.  Every election year, we hear people say, “This is the most important election ever.” But I beg to differ. Where does our generation get off saying that our issues are more important than that came before us?  Were the elections during the Cold War less important that the one we are facing now? Or what about the Space Race?  It bothers me that we have the audacity to think that the problems we are facing now are more important than the ones when Pearl Harbor was attacked.  We think we’re in a financial crisis now?  What about the stock market crash of 1929?  Just six months ago the Dow was soaring over 14,000.  Granted, the Dow has fallen below 9,000, but that is still no crash.  It just makes me think that all of the “most important election ever” speak is just a ploy by the media and politicians to scare people into voting… and I don’t like it.

Chad Taylor, a senior from Broken Arrow, is interested in news and does play-by-play for OU hockey, baseball, and softball on the WiRe, 1710 AM.

By Jamie Hughes

I’ve been watching a dramatic, comedic sitcom for over a year. And frankly, it’s getting boring.

This sitcom won’t be found on during some carefully scheduled time slot on a television network. This melodramatic series, however, is somewhat like Desperate Housewives, Grey’s Anatomy or any other show a 21-year-old girl will watch religiously, but the demographic is a lot different.

Everyone in the country, and most foreign countries, seems to be tuned in to this show 24/7. It invades our commercials, our e-mails and our radios.

The sitcom I’m talking about, my friend, is about a maverick who did social work in the south side of Chicago, can see Russia from a bedroom window and somehow possesses superpowers to solve all of Earth’s problems with some simple “change” (yes, all puns intended).

If those of you reading haven’t figured out what I’m talking about right now, you should probably come out from under the rock you call home and simply turn on a television set and wait. It will happen eventually.

This presidential race has turned in to a constant television show with repetitive-to-the-point-of-annoyance characters and horrible writers, yet the American public can’t stop watching. It is, indeed, a train wreck.

Sarah Palin, the most interesting character in my opinion, has become a legendary one. There is no doubt in my mind, regardless of who wins the election that Palin will live on as a popular culture reference for eternity. At least for those of us who can shop, say “maverick” or simply watch a news program.

Please take a moment to listen to this brief message from our sponsors:

Before I continue, I’d like to point out I am not trying to attack Gov. Palin. I believe she was a good choice for Sen. John McCain. As a young(ish) woman, she brought life his campaign with a freshness that was desperately needed for the old white man. McCain’s campaign can now be up to par with the novelty of Sen. Barack Obama’s.

Palin’s pro-life stance, illustrated by her daughter Bristol, will also reassure some of the neoconservatives who might not even vote because McCain is too “liberal.”

Some have said her gender will get some votes. Not to stereotype, but I think most of the people who would vote for someone simply to put a woman in power have more Democratic ideals and will probably vote for Obama.

Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming.

With her “Tina Fey glasses,” ratted hair and brilliantly RNC-coordinated outfits; everyone wants to dress like Palin… for Halloween.

Palin isn’t the first candidate to be made in to a holiday joke, though. I’ve seen masks of former presidents and candidates. Heck, even one movie went as far as to open a scene with a drunken “Bill Clinton” carrying around a cigar and asking where his “Monica” was.

No candidate, however, has ever been so easy to imitate.

For this claim, I will back it up with evidence.

Friends and family have always said I look like Tina Fey, so when the first round of Palin skits came out of Saturday Night Live, I started planning my Halloween costume.

Last Friday, I went to a pre-Halloween party dressed as the candidate. Good thing I already had a skirt suit in the back of my closet. I adorned the jacket lapel with McCain buttons found at the Cleveland County Republican headquarters, wore my rimless glasses and had a friend come over to help with the recognizable Palin up do. A trip to Wal-Mart for some white ribbon and a red pen to make a sash that said “Miss Wasilla” and my costume was completed.

The best part of my night wasn’t getting a few laughs from friends or taking a picture with the Obama cut out in my friend’s house, but finding my … er… Sarah Palin’s long lost twin. Yep, there was another Palin present. Her costume was a little varied, but had the same key essential elements, including the sash, something I thought was a clever, unique idea.

For as much as I’ve written about Palin, it might seem like I’ve always viewed her as an inconsequential “character.” The thought initially came to mind from a CNN article, though. The article described growing tensions between Palin and McCain and had a quote from a “Democratic pollster” saying Palin’s appearance on Saturday Night Live reinforced the character she plays.

The Democrats aren’t without their fair share of characters, though.

Obama, the Democratic nominee, has become more of a character of character, if you will. As a person who made some mistakes in the past in choices of acquaintances, words and even meetings attended, Obama has become a Marxist Muslim terrorist who intends on ruining our country from the inside.

The Democrats’ character lacks physical character traits. He also has a way worse writer for this series, answering questions with a charismatic smile.

Sure, his character always keeps the crowd guessing what’s behind that big grin, but this isn’t always a good thing. Taking the “high road,” as some have characterized Obama’s campaign tactics, doesn’t always mean you’ll end up in the high house in a city upon a hill.

Sens. Joe Biden and McCain have gotten off a little easy in this season. Their characters are a more under the radar. Some might say this is a bad thing, but there is such a thing as “bad press.”

So who has the best chance of winning the coveted Best Politician in a Dramatic Comedy in this year’s awards circuit?

The winner is Sarah Palin.

Both candidates, regardless of who takes office in January, will be remembered forever. Obama will be regarded as the first African-American presidential candidate and Palin, well Palin will bring jokes and joy into people’s lives for years to come.
Jamie Hughes is a sophomore journalism major and currently covers the City of Norman beat for the Oklahoma Daily.  

By Amy Grimes

Long after Barack Obama won the Democratic presidential nomination, Bill Clinton finally appeared on stage Wednesday night with his wife’s former campaign nemesis. Clinton, who openly talked trash about Obama for months, waited until six days before the election to make a joint appearance. This seems a little odd to me, and if I were Obama, I don’t know if I would even want Clinton on my team.

Way back in January, Obama criticized Clinton in an interview on Good Morning America, saying Clinton was continually saying untrue things about Obama with no facts to support them. So why are they on the same team now?

It seems to me both presidential candidates will say whatever and do whatever, no matter how false, just to get our votes. Next Tuesday, American voters will choose the lesser of two evils to take charge of our country.

Meanwhile, check out this website:

http://www.rockthevote.com/

Rock the Vote’s mission is to get the younger generation more involved in politics. The website uses music, popular culture and new technology to encourage younger Americans to vote.

Amy Grimes is a junior from Oklahoma City who enjoys writing and meeting new people.

By Griffin Shaffer

I hope the 2008 election has as much excitement as the previous two.  Who doesn’t want a repeat of the 2000 and 2004 elections?  All that drama!  It was great!  It was like “The Play” in the Cal-Stanford game, or the miracle Hail Mary by DougFlutie.  You know what, wouldn’t it be great if the election was like a football game…

Start of the season, each side picks its team leader.  For the Republicans, it’s a no-brainer.  They go with the experienced veteran.  He is seen by some as too far removed from the game, but when its time for the 2 minute drill and the game is on the line, he’ll lead you to the end zone.  Example: Brett Favre.

“The Play”

For the Democrats, they choose the talented rookie who is unproven but has tons of potential.  He is flashy and outspoken, and can single-handedly carry his team to victory.  Although many see his lack of experience in the big game a major issue, in the end he could rack up the yards and touchdowns, and walk away with the win.  Example: Reggie Bush.

Hail Mary

Each team goes through the long, arduous season fighting each other.  The Elephants defense stiffens up on the Donkeys offense.  But then Reggie breaks out an 80 yard rush for the touchdown and the lead.  The Elephants come right back on the shoulders of their veteran QB Favre, march down the field with a well executed drive, and score.

Skip to the fourth quarter, the score is tied and it’s the end of regulation. Now it’s sudden-death overtime.  The greatest spectacle in sport and election.  Who could forget the “quarterback sneak” in the 2000 election, when the Elephants edged out the Donkeys in overtime (and then some)? And again in 2004 when the underdog Elephants came from behind to claim victory and take home the Washington Trophy.

McCain or Obama?

 

 

In the end, it is going to come down to game plan and execution.  Whichever candidate, or “player,” can execute better will win this election.  Will the experience of McCain lead to a victory?  Or will the unknown talent of Obama pull an upset, and get the W (or job from W.)?  The time is here America. Time to vote.  I guess you could say we are the coaches, calling the final play for our team.  Of course, whoever wins becomes our President, for both our team and our country.

Griffin Shaffer, a senior from Shawnee, is an OU football fanatic, avid karaoke singer and a lover of flip flops and good times.

By Melissa Morgan

I recently attended a symposium held by the Institute for U.S.-China Issues. There were ambassadors and experts there who talked about America’s relationship with China and how much of a necessity it is that we maintain normal relations. After the panel discussion, I asked Wu Xinbo, deputy director of the Center for American Studies and associate dean of the School of International Relations and Public Affairs at Fudan University in Shanghai, whom the citizens of China want to win the 2008 presidential election. He said that, despite differing individual opinions, a majority of Chinese citizens want Obama to win the election.

This made me think. Do all the nations of the world long for the type of change that Obama promises to bring? Or is his widespread popularity due to the mere fact that Obama shines the light of diversity on America?

Well, one thing is for sure. If Obama becomes president, America will have a new face in the world. Our nation will no longer be controlled by an “old white guy,” but a young black man. Will our relationship with other countries get stronger? Will more countries accept us and not dismiss us as stupid, materialistic Americans? The impact of a minority representing the majority will have domestic ramifications as well. Will it mend the pieces of our broken nation together, or will it promote reverse discrimination?

It is safe to say that McCain is qualified to be president of the United States; however, he bears what may be considered a burden in today’s society: He is a rich, successful white man. In corporate America, reverse discrimination is well under way. Some middle-aged white males are not getting promotions they worked hard for, and some are getting beat in job competitions by minorities as part of an effort to elevate the level of diversity in the workforce.

For good or for bad, this election will affect our relationship with the world, and it will affect Americans’ opinions and relationships with one another.

Melissa Morgan is a sophomore from Keller, Texas.

By Eric Dama 

A couple days ago, I was searching the Internet for songs by one of my favorites rappers, the artist known as Ludacris.  Amid the songs about fancy cars, attractive women and big-screen TVs, I came across a title that caught my attention.  The song was titled, “Obama is Here,” and its lyrics contained endorsements for presidential nominee Barack Obama, as well as disparaging, yet irrelevant slights against fellow presidential nominee John McCain and former Obama rival Sen. Hilary Clinton.

While I was listening, one verse in particular caused me to stop and scoff, and wonder what this election is really about.  Here is the verse:

The threats ain’t fazing us, the nooses or the jokes
So get off your a**, black people, it’s time to get out and vote!

Now, I am in no way associating Ludacris or the African-American community with the Obama campaign.  However, it struck me as odd, and quite frankly ignorant, that this rapper would call the entire African-American community to vote for Obama.  Nowhere in his song does the hip-hop star present a crdible reason to vote for Obama, much less a sentence that would lead me to believe he is in any way informed on the subject of this year’s election.

That verse gave me cause for concern:  There may be a large mass of relatively uninformed voters whose votes are being swayed by a public figure who tells them radical change is necessary.  I’m not talking specifically about African-Americans.  This can include college students, farmers, union workers, Joe the Plumber, whoever.  And I’m not saying that people are wrong in voting for Obama.  I don’t know who the better candidate is.

My only point is that listening to this song reinforces my belief that voters should be as knowledgeable as possible about the candidates and issues.  If this election is really as important as everyone says it is, given the current state of affairs, then that means being an informed voter is equally as imperative.

Eric Dama is a sophomore from Dallas who covers the men’s basketball beat and writes a weekly column for the Oklahoma Daily.

By Thomas Hoffman

It is ridiculous how the media love to criticize candidates for any dirty information they can dig up. I agree that the candidates’ attacks on one another have gone overboard, but the media are only exacerbating those harassments.

I’m not a big fan of fashion, and I could care less what Sarah Palin is wearing. But why does America care how much money is spent on her wardrobe? Let’s talk about how much money Obama and McCain spend on verbally attacking each other in multi-million-dollar ad campaigns. Wherever the money goes, it is used to represent the candidates in a way that they deem necessary. If the GOP chooses to purchase Palin’s clothing to attract voters, so be it. It may sound silly, but honestly, she has an image to uphold, and America is so focused on appearance (especially in women), it would be crazy not to care about Palin’s wardrobe.

On another note, I am the last person you’ll catch watching a bunch of grumpy women argue on “The View,” but my roommate and I were surfing YouTube and came across some pretty heated arguments on the ABC talk show. It’s basically a group of loud-mouthed liberal women, specifically Joy Behar, and a seemingly innocent conservative, Elisabeth Hasselbeck. It was humorous to watch the liberals shout their attacks on McCain and Palin and express their love for Obama. In another clip, the women expressed their disgust with Hasselbeck for wearing a McCain T-shirt on an episode of the show. They told her it was surprising and simply inappropriate.

Why criticize? What’s the difference between expressing your opinion with a T-shirt (that Hasselbeck designed herself) and attacking the opposing candidate? I believe it’s more honorable to represent your preferred candidate quietly in a T-shirt than by shouting criticism to fuel applause from the audience.

Let the political parties do what they please with money to convince voters, and let voters do what they please to represent their favored political candidate.

Thomas Hoffman, a sophomore from Dallas, is involved with the student-produced “OU Nightly” newscast and is interested in business marketing and youth ministry.

By Chad Taylor

With all this talk about this being the most important election ever, it makes me wonder… Is it really?

I think not.  Every election year, we hear people say, “This is the most important election ever.” But I beg to differ. Where does our generation get off saying that our issues are more important than that came before us?  Were the elections during the Cold War less important that the one we are facing now? Or what about the Space Race?  It bothers me that we have the audacity to think that the problems we are facing now are more important than the ones when Pearl Harbor was attacked.  We think we’re in a financial crisis now?  What about the stock market crash of 1929?  Just six months ago the Dow was soaring over 14,000.  Granted, the Dow has fallen below 9,000, but that is still no crash.  It just makes me think that all of the “most important election ever” speak is just a ploy by the media and politicians to scare people into voting… and I don’t like it.

Chad Taylor, a senior from Broken Arrow, is interested in news and does play-by-play for OU hockey, baseball, and softball on the WiRe, 1710 AM.

By Anthony Foster Jr.

With only eight days left until the presidential election, I can speak for a good number of college students when I say that I am fatigued.  Not just with “politics as usual,” but with all of this new knowledge that we were supposed to be learning all along being crammed into our brains. I feel like the American public forgot to study all semester, and the final exam is coming sooner than we were expecting.

The fact of the matter is that whether we like it or not, history will be made next Tuesday. If Barack Obama is elected, America will have a black president. That in itself is dynamic. If McCain is elected, we will be “one 72-year-old heartbeat” away from having its first woman president.Is this all really happening? Taking history classes in high school used to make me wonder what it would’ve been like to live during great chapters in American history. How was it to live during the Civil War? What was life like during the Depression? What was the civil rights movement like for the blacks who actually lived it? We are watching a brand new chapter in American history begin to unfold before our eyes. To think that a black man had the audacity to believe the country could follow him as a leader and run for the highest office is remarkable. And to think that a Republican man would nominate a woman as his running mate is simply unexpected.

This election clearly marks the end of American politics as we have known it since 1776, and marks the beginning of a more genuine democracy. For most college students, this is the first presidential election we have ever been active participants in. I don’t know about the rest of my friends and acquaintances, but I am certain that after my vote is cast next week, I will be proud to be able to say that I was a “maverick” who helped bring about history 232 years in the making. That is definitely “change we can believe in.”

With that said, there is still time for more studying. Make sure to bring your No. 2 pencils next Tuesday. Don’t just guess. Don’t look at your best friend’s answers. Show your work and exhibit the knowledge you should have gained by now. Fill in the right bubble. This is definitely an exam America cannot afford to fail.

Anthony Foster Jr., the son of former KFOR reporter Anthony Foster Sr., is interested in TV news and looks to make a difference in the lives of everyone he comes in contact with.

By Kelly Marose

OK, OK… I think both parties can find amusement in this.

http://politsk.blogspot.com/2008/09/sarah_13.html

Kelly Marose is a junior from the OKC area who is excited to tell you what she thinks!

 By Jaimie Grotjan 

If Sarah Palin cared about procuring votes on this campus, she would’ve put her wardrobe budget to much better use…

Jaimie Grotjan, a Fort Worth sophomore, is interested in all forms of writing and wit and has interned with Fort Worth Magazine and the Oklahoma Daily.

By Kristin Mason

I have been listening to MSNBC, CNN, CNBC, Fox News and other news programs to hear what is being said regarding both party platforms. Of course, there are the usual cutthroat attacks, “I know how” speeches and controversies surrounding the election. So far, it appear that Obama is in the lead, barely, and that McCain needs to win the remaining states just to secure the possibility of a lead. Apparently, Obama has made his speech for when he wins and Palin is still unsure about the roles and job descriptions of a VP.

Now, here are my views about this election. I’m past scared–no matter who wins. I’m afraid this presidential election is based on the candidate’s race, not the candidate. Some people are scared to express their political views in fear it may affect personal relationships. Others don’t mind stating their opinions of a black president running the country. Included in that category is the McCain camp. I didn’t notice it until Palin went on a tangent saying that Obama was basically un-American because of his middle name, hinting at some kind of tie to terrorism. In my opinion, that was her way of saying he’s not capable because he is black. If Obama is elected, I fear white supremacist groups will protest against people who aren’t white. Even though the war may finally end in Iraq, a war will be started here at home.

Make sure you go out and vote to let those in power know whom the people of this nation want as a leader.

Kristin Mason is a junior from Oklahoma City who is anxious about the upcoming presidential vote.

By Natalie Ruhl 

I am going into this election slightly confused. There are several aspects of each candidate that I am torn on.

Experience plays a big role in many people’s decisions. Vice presidents have never been such a big, deciding factor. The controversy surrounding this election is huge, which could be helping, and also hurting the candidates.

The future means something different to each person. For my generation, it is our future jobs and peace for our nation. For our parents, it is the worry for their children and the loss of savings and retirement with an unsteady economy. For many all over, it is just about being able to put food on the table, buy a house, medicine, etc.

Each candidate calls for change. But I am not so sure politicians can ever do what they promise. I do think whoever wins is going to have a tough job ahead of them.

Natalie Ruhl is a junior from Edmond who is involved in OU cheerleading and OU Nightly.

By Whitney Ortega 

Everyone is up in arms about who’s voting for whom.  Who is the best candidate to get us through these obviously tough times?  Many times have I been put on the spot and asked, ‘Who are you voting for?’ or ‘Which party do you belong to?’  If you don’t have a carefully rehearsed and precise answer, people take it as an invitation to preach to you as to which party/candidate is the best.  If you don’t know or aren’t familiar with the political facts at hand then you’re deemed un-American.  Well, guess what? I don’t know… and no, I don’t consider myself un-American.  I was raised in a household that did not believe in voting.  Oh my….I know several people just gasped at the thought of a non-voting household!!!  How positively horrendous right? Well, I was raised by a good hardworking family, chasing the American dream.  My parents are first generation American citizens and were never taught how to learn more about political candidates.  Not to mention both practiced a religion (which I will not disclose) that discourages voting.  Yes, sounds like some sort of weird cult, but it’s not. I’m sure everyone has heard of this religion (though it generally brings some lifted eyebrows and sarcastic comments).  I, myself, was not raised to pay close attention to politics nor taught how to learn more about candidates.  I wasn’t raised with the Internet in my home so I could do research on my own.  But despite all that, I’m interested.  I want to know more.  I want to have a say.  I want to vote.  This year I have done my best to not only keep up with the political race but to learn more about politics in general.  Though I still can’t give a precise answer as to which party I represent or what my political views are.  I know what’s important to me.  I know that I don’t want my children living in a world where there is insufficient fuel or clean energy.  I myself don’t want to be paying off past generations’ debts.  I just want a chance at a happy fulfilling life in this country that I call home. I know who I support and I know why, but more importantly I know which issues are most important to me.

Whitney Ortega, a sophomore from Sweetwater, Texas, is an anchor for OU Nightly’s Noticias Breves (which airs on Telemundo) and a staff writer for the Oklahoma Daily student newspaper.

By Sarah Drew
Election after election has set the scene. Insults fly, and backstabbing ads play on every channel. Most candidates seem to spend more time putting down their opponents than pushing their own platforms. Politics has become a word laden with negative connotations that people say with a tone of disgust.

We are not putting up with it anymore.

The consensus from my peers in this election is they want to hear each candidate’s ideas for the country, not their insults.  In fact, when a candidate puts down his opponent, he actually hurts his campaign. Eyes roll, and students groan and tune out. Hearing a candidate throw out insults does not make my peers and me think less of the insulted person; it makes us think less of that candidate. After watching the presidential debates over the past few weeks, I heard many people comment on how McCain seemed to put down Obama frequently, while Obama was gracious.

This actually became the deciding factor for many people in an election where they had been previously undecided. Many of my Republican peers were turned off by the man McCain portrayed himself to be and have decided to vote for Obama.  In an election where neither platform seems more satisfactory than the other, for many people the race has come down to each candidate’s personal qualities.

People want a candidate who is honorable, not someone who will be sucked into dirty politics. America is tired of that political game.

Sarah Drew is a broadcast journalism sophomore from Flower Mound, Texas.

 By Daniel Martin

We need to do our homework a little bit better. As I am sure most of you know, this has been the largest youth voter registration campaign in election history over the last couple of months, and more and more young people are voicing their opinions every day. But a large portion of America’s youth doesn’t even know what these candidates stand for. We watch the debates and succumb to the smooth-talking, extremely broad ideas of our presidential hopefuls. Here’s the deal: Everybody wants lower taxes, cheaper tuition costs, affordable health care, alternative fuels and peace rather than war. But who is going to get those things done, and how? Both candidates pledge to change our nation, but how are they going to change it? We need to find out more about what our candidates say they are going to do and what they have done in the past before we make uneducated decisions. We should do our homework a little bit better. It’s crunch time, and the election is just over a week away. We need to find out what it is we want “changed”–and how–because when the election is over, the rest of our lives begin…

Daniel Martin is a junior from Dallas who believes that no matter what happens in this election, we need to come together to achieve any progressive change in this world.

By Elliot Jones    

I am very excited about this upcoming election. Not just because we have for the first time in history a African-American Presidential candidate but because, FINALLY, the Bush era is over. I was talking to my grandparents the other day about this election, and it’s funny how living for so long and seeing so many different presidents, they thought they’d never see the day that we could have a black president. With this election, that day soon may come, and both they and I will have witnessed history.

As a young voter, I am ready for a change. I believe that America is ready for a change as well. In 2004 there was a large turnout of young voters, and in my opinion, there will be an even larger one this election. Around the campus, I see all the time T-shirts, student election blogs and political watch parties. I think for young people, this election is the perfect opportunity for our voices to be heard and to make a change regardless of political views.

Elliot Jones, a junior from Oklahoma City, is a risk-taker who is very excited about the upcoming election

By Kristi McMullen

I was shown a website very recently called If the World Could Vote. It is a website that was started by three guys in Iceland in an effort to get more Americans to vote. You can vote from any country, and it shows how many people have voted per country, percentages, what their votes were, etc. There is even a map showing the “red countries” and “blue” countries. Please, go check it out.

My eyes got opened on this one. I like to think that I am a pretty open-minded person, but I did not see this one coming. In the Frequently Asked Questions section, the men who run the site state that they don’t believe that the world should be able to vote in this election, but simply pointed out that the American president is the most powerful man in the world. I know that he’s the most powerful man to us. But in my ignorance, I didn’t realize how powerful he was to the rest of the world. I am sickened by the thought that three men who are not even a part of this fabulous country felt moved to try to get people up and voting. I would like to believe that this election is such a big one that people will exercise their power. Because obviously, if the rest of the world could decide the election, they would do their part. So do yours.

Kristi McMullen is a junior from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, who consumes media more than she consumes actual food.

By Gregory R. Gullberg

The media do not want voters to know the truth!

That’s right… There are no typos in that sentence.  The media are lying to you.

News stations like CNN and FOX News that claim to deliver fair and balanced news coverage are doing anything but.  In fact, virtually every news outlet is guilty of biased news coverage.

They attempt to cover it up by offering news about each side so at a distance it is not always obvious.  However, when one studies them, one realizes that the news about each network’s favored party is very soft, while the news offered on the opposing party is harsh and potentially opinion altering.

As if that weren’t bad enough, they will in fact create news.  Through misquotes and exaggerations, they deceive their viewers.  It is not that they make things up, but they will take them out of context and claim it to be “gotcha journalism.”

Television comedy shows can be guilty of even more heinous displays of bias. Saturday Night Live, the Colbert Report and the Daily Show are examples. They try to hide their allegiances, but are all absolutely favorable to Democrats.

The Report and Daily Show are known for their blatant misquotations. There is a line, and they have crossed it.They do not mislead for the sake of comedy so much as they do to create mean-spirited lies about conservatives.

At least with political talk shows, hosts don’t try to hide their allegiances.

Gregory R. Gullberg is a junior from Atlanta who has the mentality that he can do absolutely anything.

By Kami Gallagher

It’s time for a check America, a fact check that is. With all the mudslinging and campaign ads that simply come out as blatant attacks on the opposite party, it is hard to know what to really believe anymore. Did Obama serve only 300 days in the U.S. Senate before he became a presidential candidate? Did McCain cast 19 votes against raising the minimum wage? These are but a few of the questions addressed on CNN’s “Truth Squad” website page. In a heated campaign such as this one, it is important to remember that media editing can make any issue seem bigger, smaller, worse, or better than it truly may be.

CNN has created a great page on its website that is dedicated to providing accurate information to all those who will come and take a look at it. When I stumbled upon this page today, I knew I needed to spread the word. So, next time you hear something that sounds too outrageous or maybe even too good to be true, check out CNN’s “Truth Squad” at http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/category/fact-check/.

We deserve to know exactly what the truth is behind all the crazy allegations and so-called truths being thrown at the American public from every direction. But we have to do our part in finding it.

Kami Gallagher is a junior from Jenks and a member of the Pride of Oklahoma.

By: Jackie Clews

According to KOCO Channel 5 News, Oklahoma has nearly 25,000 more registered voters this year than in 2004, and some states have near half a million more registered voters. This increase shows that many across America are interested in this election, which is a good thing. However, while registering is the first step, it’s not the only part to completing the process of voting. Between registering and voting is probably the most important part: becoming informed about each candidate to decide who you will support.I try not to talk about the election too much. The topic can escalate to a heated discussion very quickly, and many hold very strong opinions on issues and the candidates whom they support. However, what I have noticed while discussing the election with some college students is sometimes both scary and disappointing.

It is our generation that is going to be left to clean up the mess that has been made for us, so it is very important to stay informed about what is going on in the world. However, some are falling short of their responsibility to stay informed about current events in order to make an educated decision on Nov. 4.

The other day I heard a few guys ask another guy why he supported Obama so strongly. They added that his reasons had to be reasons why Obama was a good candidate, not why McCain wasn’t.

This guy could not come up with one decent answer. I thought this was pathetic. No matter whom you support, you should be able to say why you might or might not vote for a candidate because of his stance on issues such as health care, taxes, Social Security, immigration, women’s rights, the bailout, or maybe even his choice of running mate. One should support the candidate who has the same opinion on the issues that affect you most. This sounds simple, but can very easily be forgotten as candidates' personal lives and other irrelevant topics begin to receive more attention from the media.

For all of you who have not been watching the news coverage over the past year on one of the most exciting elections in history, visit these web sites to compare the candidates' views on different issues and how they compare to your own.

I began to make a list of where each candidate stands on each issue to make it easier, but it just got way too long. So hopefully this helps!

http://biden.senate.gov/

www.barackobama.com

www.johnmccain.com

http://gov.state.ak.us/

http://politifact.com

Take the initiative to become an informed voter. If you missed the debates or interviews, you can always catch them on YouTube.

Jackie Clews, a junior from Plano, Texas, is working on the OU Nightly newscast and interning at Channel 5 in Oklahoma City.

By James Lovett

There’s no denying the impact of the Internet on this election.

Without YouTube, there would have been no Rev. Wright controversy. Without The Huffington Post, there would have been no “bitter-gate.”

Although these two instances were negatives for Barack Obama, his campaign is taking advantage of the opportunities the Internet provides as a political medium.

Sure, Howard Dean may have been called the “first true Internet candidate” (he raised around $27 million online for his 2004 presidential bid), but Barack Obama raised $150 million in September alone, according to The Washington Post.

Both candidates have created their own social-networking sites, McCainSpace and My.BarackObama, to try and connect their bases. But according to The New York Times, Obama is far more popular on public social-networking sites like MySpace and Facebook.

He’s also the first presidential candidate to advertise in video games. The campaign has bought virtual billboards in 18 games played on Xbox Live.

In another example of the campaign embracing technology, they launched their own Iphone application. It offers several ways to keep up with campaign news and events, as well as connect with other Obama supporters.

While a successful Internet operation by itself may not be enough to win the presidency in 2008, it is clear that politics will be increasingly fought online. Whether it is through donations, advertising or networking, future campaigns will need to adapt to emerging technologies to reach potential voters.

James Lovett, a junior from Norman, writes for the Arts & Entertainment section of The Oklahoma Daily and hosts a radio program on the WiRe, 1710 AM, from 10 to midnight every Tuesday.

By Nate Feken

While Barack Obama was campaigning in Toledo, Joe Wurzelbacher, a local plumber, got the chance to question Obama on national television.  Joe was interested in buying the plumbing company where he currently is employed, but was worried about Obama’s tax plan.  Wurzelbacher said he was concerned that his company would wind up in a higher tax bracket. This might make it difficult for him to purchase his company because he would have issues paying everything off.  He said he felt Obama’s plan would ruin the “American dream” for himself and others looking to better their lives.

Without knowing it, Joe the plumber was about to become a huge part of the presidential campaign. After seeing the video of Wurzelbacher questioning Obama,  John McCain used his concerns as a weapon against Obama in the final presidential debate.  McCain said Obama’s plan would keep entrepreneurs from investing in new small businesses and hold back the growth of older small businesses.  McCain assured Wurzelbecher and others like him that he would help them live the "American dream" by not raising taxes and by providing affordable health care.

With the technology we have today, I think it is amazing that people or issues like Joe Wurzelbacher can take center stage in a presidential race.  With the amount of coverage this race is getting, candidates and voters have access to more information than ever before.  I think it’s great that technology allows for more Americans' voices to be heard.  This accomodates more voters' opinions and concerns than in previous elections.  Today’s increased media coverage allows both the voters and the candidates to have a greater understanding of what each side wants and makes it easier to support each other.

By Cassie Little

Lets face it–Obama and McCain contrast like black and white. Whether it’s foreign policy, health care or the economy, it seems these two can’t agree on anything. Even their race, age and upbringings differ completely. There is, however, one thing these presidential hopefuls have in common. This one thing is a benefit that America hasn’t seen seen JFK was in office. It is something that trumps the Bush administration by a long shot, and something that will be inspiring women and the fashion industry for years to come. And the best thing about it, both candidates offer it.

This common feature–gorgeous wives with killer style.

Now, I understand that there are greater political factors to explore when choosing a presidential candidate. All I’m saying is that the next time you are watching a McCain rally and hear fans screaming “kill Obama” or the next time you see an anti-McCain ad on TV, explore an exciting positive in this election–Cindy and Michelle.

Cassie Little, a sophomore from Elk City, is a staff writer for the Oklahoma Daily student newspaper and hopes to work as an arts and entertainment journalist.

By Elise Smith

For those of us who have yet to make up our minds, what is it that we want to hear to help us pick our candidate?

Is it based on a certain issue, such as the candidate’s economic plans, or do we care more about the candidate’s pure appeal? I am not sure there is a clear answer. Being a first-time voter, I know it can get quite quite overwhelming. As a 19-year-old who has been living in the real world for only a little over a year, I have a lot yet to encounter, and thus have not fully formed my opinion on several issues. For many undecided voters, the two candidates apparently are not appealing at all, and it really boils down to the “lesser evil” of the two. Though the candidates appear to be polar opposites, presenting two completely different points of view, there are still many of us who have yet to decide.

One thing many undecided voters probably do not realize is the profound role they will play in the election’s outcome. The undecided voters are the ones who ultimately decides the electoral vote. They are the ones the candidates are speaking to NOW more than ever: What is being said now is targeted toward those who have not decided. When thinking about it, now is the most important time in the election cycle. It is now that the final opinions are being formed that will determine the outcome of the election.

So in reality, it’s not clear that there is anything in particular that people want to hear, not a certain point of view and not even a certain appeal. How do the candidates win these undecided voters’ votes? The best advice I can offer is to be clear on where they stand on all the issues and to seem like a person offering hope in the future of this country.

By Abigail Ogle

Of course Americans need to exercise their right of voting. However, before they vote, our citizens need to be aware and knowledgeable about the candidates, their platforms, topics and false information. There have been a variety of lies and conspiracy theories circulating about both candidates. I think Americans need to do a little research and make an educated decision.

Abigail Ogle, a junior from Oklahoma City, enjoys reading, writing and of course, following politics!

By Stacy Kaplan

We all know that this election is extremely important. Every ad on TV to every celebrity walking down the red carpet has made it a point that we all need to vote. However, while voting is crucial, some people might need to start tuning in to what is going on, or stay at home on Election Day. In some of my classes, I have heard people say they don’t really know what each candidate stands for, let alone who is a Democrat and who is a Republican. Yes, it is ridiculous. We may laugh and walk the other way, but needless to say, they’re still voting. This is causing a problem that is larger than we realize!

By Jamie Hughes

Move over, McCain and Palin, there’s a new maverick in town. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, endorsed Senator Barack Obama, a Democrat, Sunday.

Powell’s ability to “reach across the aisle” and endorse someone of a different party provides an insight into what members of John McCain and Sarah Palin’s own party think of the two. Election day is looming, and with negative attacks of Obama being linked with terrorists and accused of having a socialist mindset, the endorsement could not have come at a better time for the presidential hopeful. Middle-leaning Republicans and independents who respect Powell will now have a more moderate figure to look to for guidance. The endorsement will definitely have an effect on voters across the country, regardless of party.

There is one issue the mainstream media might be overlooking, however. There is no doubt that Powell endorsed Obama for his policies; Powell has even skirted around the issue himself, but does race play a part in the endorsement? When Powell endorsed Obama on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” he mentioned Obama’s “ability to inspire” different groups across the nation, including ethnic groups. Powell said if Obama does win, “all Americans should be proud, not just Africian-Americans.” Whether the media and analysts are dancing around the issue because of the connotation of the word and what it means to the campaign, or whether they just haven’t gotten around to addressing the issue, it should be looked into for the general public. Journalists today are lucky to be reporting on such a historic campaign, and they should take advantage of the opportunity to ask the “tough questions” in a diplomatic and tactful way.

By Ashley Foster

I can handle someone ranting about taxes, health insurance and Social Security. There are things that affect us all and actually have something to do with politics. I feel like we’ve gotten used to the fact that we’ll always argue about them, and there will really never be any resolution. This is an accepted trend by now. We will then begin to complain about something else and eventually circle back for round two. But what happens when things become a little too personal? What happens when a racist, irrational fear of those who are not white seems to find itself on YouTube or various news sources? Racism seems to hide sometimes; it can be forgotten, but it always finds its way back to the surface.

I’m not going to say that America is in shambles because of bigots, and we might as well all move to Sweden. (Canada is used entirely too much.) In fact, I would really like to retain some hope for our country, and I believe that these are the voices of outnumbered extremists whose own twisted ideas could never run this nation. At the same time, I can’t make excuses for ignorance. And as a Christian, I do not want to be associated with these radicals who have more hate in their heart than anything else. It’s just absolutely incredible the backwards nonsense that comes out of the woodwork once a black man gets closer to the White House. And please correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that the Civil Rights Act happened. Going along with that, there had to be a reason why there was so much blood shed during the Civil War, and I don’t believe it happened so that people could walk around fearing the so-called black agenda. I guess my thinking is simple: Black is a color, white is a color, brown is a color, and the Crayola 128 box has lots of colors. I’ve always liked that box. Someone’s skin color does not define them–I feel that this is so elementary to say at this point, but apparently it hasn’t sunk in for everyone. Being black doesn’t make you a gangster or white-hater; being Mexican doesn’t make you a housekeeper, and being a white male doesn’t make you a horrendous dancer. These things reside in one’s personality, beliefs, environment, etc. We’re born with a predetermined skin color, but how we decide to live our lives after this point is what should be evaluated, and not stereotyped. And I really don’t know how it got into the air that Barack is anti-white and thinks we’re all trash, especially since his running mate and grandmother are both white. An interesting but ridiculous claim indeed.Next point–I would be ever so thankful if everyone who still believes that Obama is a Muslim would make a mass exit from under that rock where they’ve been residing and watch a news program. I encourage you to watch this clip right now. It should clear up this absurd idea pattern that I thought had ended already.

Last point–Why is it so common to associate all Muslims with terrorism? Yes, I do realize that Muslim extremists were the culprits of 9/11. But Timothy McVeigh, a white non-Muslim, also committed an act of terror in Oklahoma City April 19, 1995, when he bombed the Murrah Building. Yet it seems that to many, if someone’s a Muslim he might as well be Bin Laden. Just as I don’t want to be associated with racist Christians, I’m quite positive that many Muslims out there would prefer to not be associated with the suicide bombers of 9/11.It may be too much to ask to stop stereotyping and actually do some research to have informed opinions, but it sure would make this election a lot less tedious and painful. It just seems as time progresses, elections become dirtier and less about…you know, politics. I would like to see us get back on track, and let the voting season become political once again.

Ashley Foster is a sophomore from Edmond who loves to argue, write and photograph.

By Amy Grimes

Americans are sick and tired of this year’s race to the White House.

Senator John McCain and Senator Barack Obama have been at each other’s throat for months now. They have been disagreeing about everything from foreign affairs to U.S. taxes.

Obama has become a sort of celebrity. He reminds me a lot of the late President John F. Kennedy: charismatic, good-looking and smooth-talking.

Obama’s whole campaign is supposedly all about “change.” But what change? All he preaches about is being different from President George W. Bush. But he’s not saying actually how this change is going to take place.

It is annoying how Obama keeps saying basically how awful Bush is, and his main source of criticism against McCain is claiming McCain’s team is similar to Bush’s. As for all these people bashing Bush and his team: Get over it, and show some respect. He’s still your president unitl January. As I recall, the American people used to like Bush. Not only did we vote him into the White House once, but twice.

McCain, on the other hand, is not as smooth-talking, and is 72 years old to Obama’s 47. Basically, he’s the complete opposite of Obama. Obama wants to “sit down” with other nations and solve our foreign issues, while McCain said he doesn’t want to sit down with the enemy.

Whatever happens, happens, my vote was decided a long time ago, and it will stay the same. Everyone is encouraged to vote. Just think about what is best for your country.

Amy Grimes is a junior from Oklahoma City who enjoys writing and meeting new people.

By Melissa Morgan

The 2008 presidential election has proven to be everything Americans could have hoped for, an all-out circus filled with strategic attack ads that have made this election a bloodbath. In the grand American tradition of what has come to be known as “The Election Season,” Senators Barack Obama and John McCain have rallied their troops, manned the tanks of political might. And now, just three weeks before the election, America is once again engaged in the battle to elect its candidate for president of the United States.

Senator Obama clinched the Democratic nomination in the now-famous duel with former First Lady and New York Senator Hillary Clinton. He is riding the wave of the invigorated and optimistic youth vote that has grown weary of war and has a yearning to turn the page on the troubled eight years our country has endured. Senator McCain had his fair share of adversaries in his early and decisive victory for the nomination, but that should be expected from a former POW and warrior.

Both presidential hopefuls have promised “change.” But what is the change they are referring to? And more importantly, will they be able to keep their promise? So often we Americans hear ideas of the hope for a better tomorrow that have often fallen short of what we were promised when we cast our ballots.

Senator Obama has promised American voters the world, from unprecedented tax breaks and universal health care to ending the war in Iraq and becoming more of a world cooperator rather than leading the world. Some pundits have come to refer to Obama’s plan as the entitlement society, and many conservatives have criticized that under an Obama administration, America would be engaging in a socialist society and that the American dream to better one’s self in a bid for success would die. While Obama’s ideas for the United States are wonderful for the ideal Utopian society, we must ask ourselves in this troubling economy, is it the correct thing to raise taxes, increasing federal spending that by all accounts would only deepen our $10 trillion debt?

On the other hand, Senator McCain has promised health care credits, a freeze on all federal spending for one year, along with purchasing all of the home loans that have been foreclosed due to the sub-prime mortgage crisis America is currently entangled in. Senator McCain promises to engage in the Iraq war in the manner it should have been handled from the start. McCain’s plan resembles much of the Reagan philosophy of the 1980s, but can America really pull itself out a second time around using a plan that worked then? Many liberal critics have argued that McCain’s policies offer no relief to the middle and lower classes, and have made the claim that it would only widen the ever growing gap between the haves and have-nots.

On one side, we have a young determined Obama, and on the other, we have seasoned veteran McCain; both are determined to take on the Washington machine. Democrat or Republican, both have admirable, audacious plans for bringing “change” to the American political scene. No matter who wins this election, only time will tell if their ambitious plans will actually deliver on the change they promise the American voter.

Melissa Morgan is a sophomore from Keller, Texas. Boomer Sooner!

By Eric Dama

McCain’s last best chance.

That’s how most pundits and political advisers viewed Wednesday night’s debate at Hofstra University.

The third and final debate between the two presidential candidates presented an environment which allowed the two men to directly speak to each other, promoting an often argumentative and at times attacking style of debate.

The general consensus thus far seems to be that Sen. Barack Obama has the edge over Sen. John McCain.  The polls show that most voters are leaning towards Obama, and the first two debates ended with most people giving both victories to the Democratic nominee.

But since the format of Wednesday night’s debate allowed for a more confrontational approach, many thought that McCain would use his attacking skills to finally make his mark and potentially halt the momentum Obama has been gaining.

In many ways he did.  The quote of the night was from McCain, as he looked squarely at Obama.

“If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago,” the Republican nominee said confidently.

The comment was in reference to how Obama and his campaign continue to align the Bush administration with McCain’s campaign.  Obama says that this nation needs change, and that McCain’s campaign platforms are too similar to the current Bush administration’s.

McCain was very successful Wednesday night in letting Obama and voters all across the country know that his would-be administration offers plenty of differences from the current Bush administration.  But was that enough?

Following Wednesday night’s festivities, the reviews were mixed in terms of who came out on top.  Some saw McCain’s fiery and confrontational approach as a sign of his readiness to compete with Obama.  Still, others gave credit to Obama for keeping his cool as McCain hurled out his arguments.

This was certainly McCain’s finest performance of the three debates.  However, I’m not certain it was enough to cause voters to think twice and to curtail Obama’s momentum.

Wednesday was McCain’s last best chance, and although he turned in his best performance thus far, the hole simply may have been too deep.

By Jaimie Grotjan

When Isaac Davis, an engineering sophomore at the University of Oklahoma, said he deals in ideas, he was right.

I only wish he were a more accurate sample of American college students; furthermore, of Americans.

Look around campus for a little while and you’ll find the politically active:  Those brave, unfettered souls who are lauded by political science professors, whose passing is mourned by sociologists and analysts the country over.

I’m not being self-righteous, here; talking to this brilliant young man left me walking away with head hung, kicking the ground out of guilt for dealing not in ideas, but emotions.

Regardless of who you’re planning to vote for, you can’t tell me that elections—not least this one—aren’t emotionally charged.  Just listen to the rhetoric.  One word:  Change.  I recall sitting in a class with OU’s apotheosized political science professor David Ray last fall, where he proceeded to lament the lack of student interest in our political process.  Last fall I agreed, but this fall, I’m witnessing a surge of excitement and participation that Isaac attributes (rightly, I believe) to a welcome break from the status quo.

The status quo would be what Isaac calls “old people who have been in Washington for so many years,” as opposed to Obama, who gives voters “a reason to believe in something young and new.”

While I recognize the appeal of this wave of emotion, these high feelings aren’t sufficient reason for us to vote in a man who will lead our country into stability or chaos for the next four years.

When it comes to making these kinds of decisions, Isaac’s got it where it counts.  He waves a copy of The Solzhenitsyn Reader— chock full of philosophy about the intellectual origin of Western civilization translated from Russian—in the air with rather appreciative intensity, almost affection.  Isaac says of its author:  “He’ll tell it like it is…he’s not afraid to attack conservative ideas.”  To Isaac, a member of the conservative student think tank called the Churchill Society, that’s a big deal.  “It takes a unique political person to be interested in ideas behind things” and to be willing not only to support ideologies, but to investigate them, he said.

I think we can all take a cue from Isaac and be dealers in ideas.  Emotions are for commercials, and while many media like to sell our candidates like they would soap brands, this is politics.  This election, shall we kick emotions out of office and elect ideas in their place? When Isaac Davis, an engineering sophomore at the University of Oklahoma, said he deals in ideas, he was right.

I only wish he were a more accurate sample of American college students; furthermore, of Americans.

Look around campus for a little while and you’ll find the politically active:  Those brave, unfettered souls who are lauded by political science professors, whose passing is mourned by sociologists and analysts the country over.

I’m not being self-righteous, here; talking to this brilliant young man left me walking away with head hung, kicking the ground out of guilt for dealing not in ideas, but emotions.

Regardless of who you’re planning to vote for, you can’t tell me that elections—not least this one—aren’t emotionally charged.  Just listen to the rhetoric.  One word:  Change.  I recall sitting in a class with OU’s apotheosized political science professor David Ray last fall, where he proceeded to lament the lack of student interest in our political process.  Last fall I agreed, but this fall, I’m witnessing a surge of excitement and participation that Isaac attributes (rightly, I believe) to a welcome break from the status quo.

The status quo would be what Isaac calls “old people who have been in Washington for so many years,” as opposed to Obama, who gives voters “a reason to believe in something young and new.”

While I recognize the appeal of this wave of emotion, these high feelings aren’t sufficient reason for us to vote in a man who will lead our country into stability or chaos for the next four years.

When it comes to making these kinds of decisions, Isaac’s got it where it counts.  He waves a copy of The Solzhenitsyn Reader— chock full of philosophy about the intellectual origin of Western civilization translated from Russian—in the air with rather appreciative intensity, almost affection.  Isaac says of its author:  “He’ll tell it like it is…he’s not afraid to attack conservative ideas.”  To Isaac, a member of the conservative student think tank called the Churchill Society, that’s a big deal.  “It takes a unique political person to be interested in ideas behind things” and to be willing not only to support ideologies, but to investigate them, he said.

I think we can all take a cue from Isaac and be dealers in ideas.  Emotions are for commercials, and while many media like to sell our candidates like they would soap brands, this is politics.  This election, shall we kick emotions out of office and elect ideas in their place?

Jaimie Grotjan, a sophomore from Fort Worth, is interested in all forms of writing and wit and has interned with Fort Worth Magazine and the Oklahoma Daily.

By Griffin Shaffer

This is a note to everyone who is tired of the candidates using personal attacks rather than addressing the issues: Get over it.  It’s never going to change. We are at an age when the average American has no idea what is going on with the economic and political issues around them.  Besides, a well-informed voter should be able to see past these negative attacks and focus on the issues. Too many voters bitch and whine about how terrible this is, but then they go out and argue and blog demeaning the other candidate.  You’re all a bunch of damn hypocrites if you ask me.  If you so despise these negative ads, then why do you belittle and degrade the character of the other candidate with a differing view than your own? People preach tolerance and understanding unless an individual has a different view or belief than their own.

Now, to say I agree with these attacks is incorrect, despite what my rant may insinuate.  But I’m not going to run around, complaining to everyone how sad the plight of our candidate campaigns are being run.  I honestly don’t care.  I pay no attention to these ads.  I usually turn the TV off when one comes on, even if it is for my candidate.  And if someone is swayed by a negative ad, then God help our country.

Also, for those who are upset about the candidates not directly addressing the issues, listen up: Get over it.  When was the last time a presidential candidate actually addressed the issue at hand and took a firm stand on one side or the other?  I’m not going to lie to you; I’m a John McCain supporter.  And I do believe that Obama is all talk and lacking in experience.  But neither candidate will address a problem and give a straight answer.  It would appease half the country, and the other half would be pised off.  If you are intelligent enough, you can see what the stance of a candidate will be by looking at their voting records and political position prior to running for president.

So for everyone who only gets upset and political for a couple months every four years, please…get over it!

Griffin Shaffer, a senior from Shawnee, is an OU football fanatic, avid karaoke singer and a lover of flip flops and good times.

By Thomas Hoffman

The 2008 presidential election is being called one of the biggest political decisions in history. However, at the same time, Senators McCain and Obama continue to avoid the questions that need answers. The final presidential debate was held Wednesday night. A prime reason for holding a debate is to help uncommitted voters find a candidate they believe in, yet the candidates continued to talk in circles and take the low road by negatively representing one another.

In this last debate, McCain finally showed some much-needed aggressiveness while Obama continued to eloquently talk his way out of tough questions. Did Obama even know what he was saying himself? I am convinced the reason that, according to a CBS poll, “Obama won” is because of his articulate, smooth talking. And maybe he deserves it. McCain continues to stumble over his words and can be just as confusing.

A huge focus in this year’s presidential election is on both Sarah Palin and Joe Biden. Both the Republican and Democratic vice presidential running mates have drawn more attention than ever, even more so than the presidential candidates themselves at times. A very interesting and vital question asked in Wednesday’s debate was on both candidates’ view of their opponent’s running mate. Obama dodged the bullet when asked if he thought Palin is qualified to be the next vice president. Why not just answer the question? He called her a “capable politician,” but once again said it is America’s decision. McCain at least showed some confidence in his response. He called Biden qualified to lead the country, yet “wrong” on several foreign policy issues.

Who are the candidates afraid of upsetting? The arguing in the final debate was actually encouraging. Let’s get this debate stirred up. The candidates need to end the approach of pleasing everyone and just shoot straight!

After an hour of the debate I was disinterested and honestly confused by what the candidates were saying. The name I’m checking on the ballot has been decided for several months now. Since it has been so hard to decipher the candidates’ beliefs on several issues, my attention has turned heavily to character in the campaign. Sadly, the actual issues have become less and less important because neither candidate seems to have a solid plan that actually makes sense. Although it’s cliché, I’ve turned to people not politics.

Who do I trust most? Who do I want to lead my country? Who has the character and integrity that I would be proud to call my president? That’s who is getting my vote on November 4.

Thomas Hoffman, a sophomore from Dallas, is involved with the student-produced “OU Nightly” newscast and is interested in business marketing and youth ministry.

By J.B. Ruble

This presidential race is ludicrous. Absolutely inane.

As history is being made by the kinds of people running for the country’s most prestigious public office, so too are we chronicling one of the most divisive and negative elections ever. As an American watching this unfold, removing political affiliation, I am deeply saddened. In a moment where the progress and diversity of our great nation should be celebrated, instead we lay our eyes upon complete polarization.

It is not new in the realm of politics to point out a competitor’s flaws and inadequacies. It would be negligent of a candidate not to do so if they feel it is a legitimate point of contention that could directly affect the well being of the people they hope to govern. Completely warranted, even if grating on the ears over a long period of time.

What we see here is different. The comments being made by both candidates and their running mates are regressing into statements made to discredit their opponent instead of bolster their legitimacy to steer the ship.

And it’s taking on water, fast.

The economy is a mite unstable (a mite understatement). Energy prices, where we get it, and the emissions produced mattered most to a majority of Americans before their IRAs and mutual funds flew south for the winter. Though not as timely, there is still a war. These are three issues that would garner the brunt of the attention in many other election years.

With these giant problems front and center, it instills little confidence in the future to see the hatred oozing from both sides of aisle. Discussions quickly escalate into what the other guy will do wrong, instead of what they will do right.

The University of Wisconsin Advertising Project reported that 73 percent of McCain’s ads are negative, while 61 percent of Obama’s have also taken this caustic approach. These figures are both significantly higher than Bush and Kerry’s output in 2004.

What are the causes of this disturbing and exponentially increasing trend?

This is pure speculation, but it seems the tactic is effective. George W. Bush ran more negative ads than either of his opponents in 2000 and 2004, not to mention instilling FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) whenever the opportunity reared its timely head. Negativity was not the deciding factor, but it proved a key wedge for moderates deciding who was most able to lead the free world.

This time around the bend, it seems an all-out pessimism fest. The anger from the public regarding our current state and the current regime’s perceived inability to handle it is no doubt influencing the climate. McCain is being labeled as George Bush, whereas months ago, many liberals (including Joe Biden) were credited with nothing but respectful comments for the senior senator from Arizona. Obama, on the other hand, is admonished for his lack of experience repeatedly.

It all bludgeons the public over the head like a billy club. And this beating’s available 24 hours a day at a media outlet near you.

How refreshing it would be to hear someone speak on solutions to the many adverse situations we face as a country. How they would rise above petty bipartisan squabbles and bring America’s best and brightest together to face the future as a united front.

It’s what Lincoln did, and it brought this country through a time of such tumult we, in our lifetimes, have never seen its equal.

Unfortunately, I don’t see a Lincoln. I don’t even see a Reagan, who McCain so lavishly praises as his idol.

I see a decision made in November based on the lesser of two evils, and cold, uninspiring policy alone.

There is little redeeming about two grown men mudslinging like children in a sandbox.

J.B. Ruble is a senior from New Orleans who enjoys sports, short walks on the beach, and political dissention.