<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ScissorTales &#187; mark green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/author/mark-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales</link>
	<description>Commentary and insight on the issues of the day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New GOP chairman</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/17/steele-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/17/steele-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You may have missed it Friday, but the Republican National Committee replaced Chairman Michael Steele with Reince Priebus, the former chairman of the Wisconsin Republican Party.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have missed it Friday, but the Republican National Committee replaced Chairman Michael Steele with Reince Priebus, the former chairman of the Wisconsin Republican Party. National GOPers are banking on Priebus to erase the party&#8217;s $22 million debt while simultaneously revving up the fundraising machinery for the 2012 election cycle &#8212; when political history&#8217;s most prodigious fund raiser, President Obama, will be leading the charge for Democrats. Some estimate Republicans will need to raise $400 million the next two years if they hope to retake the Senate and defeat Obama. That&#8217;s a lot of cabbage. Steele fell out of favor primarily because of fundraising problems, the national committee&#8217;s spending priorities and uncertain leadership with the rise of the Tea Party movement. One of Priebus&#8217; challenges will be managing cooperation between the ideological cousins while restoring confidence in the GOP among some of its biggest donors. Priebus comes to the job having managed a Republican resurgence in the Badger State that toppled incumbent Democrat Sen. Russ Feingold and reclaimed the governor&#8217;s mansion last fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/17/steele-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End the great divide?</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/13/end-the-great-divide/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/13/end-the-great-divide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought from U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., concerning the State of the Union speech on Jan.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought from U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., concerning the State of the Union speech on Jan. 25. Instead of having Republicans sit on one side of the House chamber and Democrats on the other as they traditionally do, why not mix everyone up in a spirit of bipartisanship? Udall says he hopes such a seating arrangement will &#8220;begin to  rekindle the common spark that brought us here from 50 different states  and widely diverging backgrounds to serve the public good.&#8221; Sure, and they could start each day in Congress by singing &#8220;Kumbaya.&#8221; OK, that&#8217;s a little harsh. Udall&#8217;s suggestion certainly couldn&#8217;t hurt anything. Maybe if South Carolina Republican Joe Wilson were seated among a bunch of Democrats he wouldn&#8217;t blurt out &#8220;You lie!&#8221; while Obama is speaking, like he did during a 2009 address. Maybe a different seating chart really would foster greater cooperation. Maybe &#8230; nah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/13/end-the-great-divide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have a nice trip? Yuk, yuk, yuk</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/12/have-a-nice-trip-yuk-yuk-yuk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/12/have-a-nice-trip-yuk-yuk-yuk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it really news when a big-name politician takes a prat fall &#8212; on stairs, boarding planes, etc.?</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really news when a big-name politician takes a prat fall &#8212; on stairs, boarding planes, etc.? Think about it: What is the &#8220;news&#8221; in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stumbling as she boarded her plane in Yemen the other day? That she&#8217;s clumsy, perhaps clumsier than the average person? Please. London&#8217;s Daily Mail newspaper had a full report on Hillary&#8217;s trip (har!), with several photographs &#8212; and, of course, video. Yep, Hillary ended up on her knees alright. So what? Most people can&#8217;t fathom how many flights the secretary takes, and most of the time she boards them using the old-fashioned mobile staircase instead of the passenger-friendly jet ways most people use &#8212; for the obligatory photo of her smiling and waving. Or in Yemen, stumbling. Hillary will have to be more careful. Back in the 1970s, President Ford had a run of missteps, caught on cameras, that fed into a media-driven perception that Ford was a klutz. No matter that Ford, a former University of Michigan football player, actually was well-coordinated. A few more false steps from Hillary and she&#8217;ll be peppered with cracks like the one from someone in Texas, logged into the Mail&#8217;s comments section: &#8220;She probably tripped over her ego.&#8221; Hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/12/have-a-nice-trip-yuk-yuk-yuk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hammer (gets) time</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/11/hammer-gets-time/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/11/hammer-gets-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding too clever, how about this observation in the case of former U.S.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding too clever, how about this observation in the case of former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom Delay of Texas, who was sentenced to three years in prison on money laundering and conspiracy convictions this week: It looks like &#8220;The Hammer&#8221; now knows what it&#8217;s like to be the nail.</p>
<p>OK, stop the groaning. Delay is a classic how-the-mighty-have-fallen story. At his apex he was one of the most powerful men in Washington, leading the Republicans in the House and raising millions of dollars for GOP candidates with a style that earned him that descriptive nickname.</p>
<p>Delay claims he was railroaded in Travis County, one of the most Democratic counties in otherwise mostly Republican Texas. But a jury was convinced he maneuvered to illegally channel corporate donations to state House candidates in 2002. &#8220;Everything I did was covered by accountants and lawyers telling me  what I had to do to stay within the law,&#8221; said Delay, who served in Congress from 1984 to 2006. &#8220;I can&#8217;t be remorseful for something I don&#8217;t think I did.&#8221; Remorseful or not, Delay appears headed for another house, the Big House. He is appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/11/hammer-gets-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shielded from the Tax Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/07/shielded-from-the-tax-man/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/07/shielded-from-the-tax-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Timing is everything, even in death. The children of Elizabeth Edwards will pay no estate tax on the wealth their mother left them after succumbing to cancer Dec.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timing is everything, even in death. The children of Elizabeth Edwards will pay no estate tax on the wealth their mother left them after succumbing to cancer Dec. 7, and they have Republicans to thank. The GOP was mostly responsible for getting the federal estate or death tax phased out as part of the Bush tax-cut package. For 2010 the death tax rate was zero. Because of when Edwards passed away, the $1.5 million estate she left Cate, Emma Claire and Jack won&#8217;t be subject to the death tax. According to the Raleigh News &amp; Observer, Edwards likely has other assets in a trust for her children. No mention of estranged husband John in her will, to no one&#8217;s surprise &#8212; except maybe his.</p>
<div>
<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47202.html#ixzz1AMuvRFKA"><br />
</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/07/shielded-from-the-tax-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposing the queen</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/06/opposing-the-queen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/06/opposing-the-queen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Item: U.S. Rep. Dan Boren, D-Muskogee, was one of 19 Democrats who didn&#8217;t vote for Nancy Pelosi in Wednesday&#8217;s contest for House speaker.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Item: U.S. Rep. Dan Boren, D-Muskogee, was one of 19 Democrats who <em>didn&#8217;t</em> vote for Nancy Pelosi in Wednesday&#8217;s contest for House speaker. The vote itself was academic; John Boehner is speaker because Republicans outnumber Democrats in the new House 242-193. More significant is the strain within Democratic ranks, illustrated by the largest repudiation of a party&#8217;s candidate for speaker in nearly 90 years. As Chris Casteel reports in The Oklahoman, Boren&#8217;s vote was no surprise. He had told numerous town hall meetings last year he wouldn&#8217;t support Pelosi in the speaker&#8217;s vote, and he didn&#8217;t. &#8220;I kept my word,&#8221; he said, voting instead for North Carolina Democrat Heath Shuler.</p>
<p>A couple of points. As mentioned, there must be a number of unhappy campers in the Democratic cloakroom because Pelosi is still leading their parade &#8212; even more than were willing to oppose her publicly. (On the flip side, it&#8217;s amazing that a guy like Virginia Democrat Gerry Connolly, who eked out an 800-vote victory in November over an opponent he beat by 12 percentage points in 2008, still voted for Pelosi.)</p>
<p>As for Boren and others who defied her, wow! The old adage says you don&#8217;t take on the king (or queen, as it were) unless you&#8217;re sure you can knock &#8216;em off the throne. Pelosi&#8217;s still there. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how they handle those awkward situations in the House elevators. Seriously, keep an eye on Boren and the others to see if Pelosi follows through with another old saying: Don&#8217;t get mad, get even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/06/opposing-the-queen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Captain crunched</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/04/captain-crunched/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/04/captain-crunched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As tempting as it is to bemoan the Navy&#8217;s loss of an obviously capable officer &#8212; you don&#8217;t rise to the command of an aircraft carrier by being anything less than stellar &#8212; Capt.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As tempting as it is to bemoan the Navy&#8217;s loss of an obviously capable officer &#8212; you don&#8217;t rise to the command of an aircraft carrier by being anything less than stellar &#8212; Capt. Owen Honors&#8217; rapid defrocking over some reportedly coarse and sexually explicit videos in which he starred was necessary. Shipboard life is notoriously salty, and lots of USS Enterprise crew members probably laughed themselves silly to see Honors, the ship&#8217;s executive officer when the videos were made in 2006 and 2007, doing the things he did. Honors surely did it for the laughs. But now he&#8217;s a laughingstock, unceremoniously yanked from command of the Enterprise, which he&#8217;d held since May. Military leadership is a combination of intelligence, decisive analytical skills and charisma. But it&#8217;s also about judgment, and Capt. Honors&#8217; dishonorable comportment showed he&#8217;s lacking in that department &#8212; which is why he&#8217;s contemplating a career out of uniform now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2011/01/04/captain-crunched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor connection</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/31/poor-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/31/poor-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A postscript to President Obama&#8217;s phone call to Philadelphia Eagles  owner Jeffrey Lurie, reportedly thanking Lurie for signing controversial  quarterback Michael Vick.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A postscript to President Obama&#8217;s phone call to Philadelphia Eagles  owner Jeffrey Lurie, reportedly thanking Lurie for signing controversial  quarterback Michael Vick. The call really torqued conservative pundit  Tucker Carlson (also an animal lover), who said Vick should&#8217;ve been  executed for torturing and killing dogs.</p>
<p>Now comes a report from  Tacoma, Wash., that the father of a U.S. soldier killed in Afghanistan  was told Obama doesn&#8217;t regularly phone individual families of war dead. Ouch. Here&#8217;s how it looks: The commander-in-chief can chit-chat with an  NFL owner about resuscitating Michael Vick&#8217;s football career but can&#8217;t  find the time to talk to the grieving parents of a dead soldier. &#8220;That burns,&#8221; said Patrick  Collins, father of U.S. Army Sgt. Sean Collins, who was laid to rest  recently.  &#8220;Any soldier that gets killed in action, you&#8217;d think the  president would be calling someone in the family,&#8221; Collins <a href="http://blog.thenewstribune.com/military">told</a> the Tacoma News Tribune.  &#8220;There&#8217;s no politics in it. His predecessor  did it.&#8221; Double ouch.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the newspaper reports, the Collins family  suffered another slight when a sympathy letter arrived from the  office of  U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. Good intentions, poor  execution: The News Tribune reports the last paragraph of the letter misidentified the fallen  soldier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/31/poor-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming on too strong</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/30/coming-on-too-strong/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/30/coming-on-too-strong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No walk-back, yet, by Tucker Carlson from his broadcast remark that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Michael Vick should have been executed after being convicted of torturing and killing dogs.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No walk-back, yet, by Tucker Carlson from his broadcast remark that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Michael Vick should have been executed after being convicted of torturing and killing dogs. The editor in chief of The Daily Caller, an online news outlet, Carlson made the comment Tuesday while guest-hosting Sean Hannity&#8217;s show on Fox News. &#8220;Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did in a heartless and cruel way, and I think personally he should have been executed for that,&#8221; Carlson said.</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s strong &#8212; too strong! But here&#8217;s some context: In addition to his work as a conservative pundit, Carlson is an animal rights defender. Earlier this year he recorded a public service spot for the Washington Animal Rescue League. He was talking about Vick in connection with President Obama&#8217;s phone call to Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie, reportedly thanking Lurie for signing Vick in 2009 after the player served 21 months in federal prison for his involvement in an illegal dog-fighting ring. Carlson said Obama&#8217;s support for &#8220;someone who murdered dogs&#8221; was &#8220;kind of beyond the pale.&#8221; He&#8217;s got a point about Obama but not about Vick and the death penalty. Tucker Carlson is a thoughtful, interesting commentator, but that one got away from him.</p>
<div><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/29/thedc-on-tv-tucker-carlson-discusses-michael-vicks-punishment/#ixzz19caFQZub"><br />
</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/30/coming-on-too-strong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What comeback?</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/23/what-comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/23/what-comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not too many weeks ago much of the gab in Washington was about Barack Obama&#8217;s doomed presidency.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too many weeks ago much of the gab in Washington was about Barack Obama&#8217;s doomed presidency. His job approval ratings were in a free fall, Democrats got their corn creamed in the mid-term congressional elections and the atmosphere inside the Beltway resembled the scenes in &#8220;Gone With The Wind&#8221; where everybody&#8217;s trying to get out of Atlanta ahead of Sherman&#8217;s marauding Yankees.</p>
<p>That was then, this is now: Obama&#8217;s the &#8220;comeback kid&#8221; after Democrat majorities in the lame-duck Congress passed some items on his wish list &#8212; just before the dreaded Republicans take over the House and bulk up in the Senate. &#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; was repealed, the New START arms control treaty was ratified and a new health care package for 9/11 first responders was created. Obama called it proof Democrats and Republicans can work together &#8212; under his leadership, of course &#8212; and scooted off to Hawaii for a luau. Stories appeared in The Washington Post, New York Times and on Web sites marveling at Obama&#8217;s resurgence. Amazing, right? Uh, no.</p>
<p>Lest we forget, Obama also absorbed a tax deal with Republicans that has &#8216;em rioting over at Moveon.org, and he and his Hill allies retreated on a gargantuan spending bill. DREAM Act legislation creating a citizenship path for illegal aliens who came to the U.S. as children, coveted by Obama, fizzled. As for Obama&#8217;s victories, the DADT repeal and New START both had significant Republican support all along. It&#8217;s not like Obama rose up and decreed their passage. Besides, as Jennifer Rubin writes on her Washington Post <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-turn/2010/12/psst_theres_no_obama_comeback.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">blog</a>, Republicans wouldn&#8217;t trade victories on taxes, spending and the DREAM Act for wins on DADT and the treaty &#8212; &#8220;not in a million years.&#8221;</p>
<p>So has Obama got the &#8220;mojo&#8221; back? Unclear. Passing stuff with the help of a bunch of Democrats who won&#8217;t be back next month is hardly an objective test. Let&#8217;s see how things go when the 112th Congress comes to town before we start laying it on about comebacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/23/what-comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator No&#8217;s dilemma</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/22/senator-nos-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/22/senator-nos-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just about everyone knows U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn is known around Washington as &#8220;Senator No,&#8221; for the times he single-handedly has blocked what he considers wasteful federal spending and legislation funded by borrowing.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about everyone knows U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn is known around Washington as &#8220;Senator No,&#8221; for the times he single-handedly has blocked what he considers wasteful federal spending and legislation funded by borrowing. In the clubby atmosphere of the Senate it&#8217;s an awkward roost &#8212; except that Coburn doesn&#8217;t care a whit about the institution&#8217;s you-scratch-my-back, I&#8217;ll-scratch-yours expectations.</p>
<p>Things get a little harrier when there&#8217;s an issue that attracts attention beyond the Beltway, such as legislation creating a health care package for 9/11 first responders. Coburn was opposed mostly because the spending wasn&#8217;t offset and because it bore the aroma of a new entitlement. Supporters easily morphed that position into attacks that Coburn didn&#8217;t care about first responders. Eventually, a compromise was worked out, but not before Coburn was portrayed as a heartless villain.</p>
<p>The issue illustrates one of Coburn&#8217;s main points about Washington: You can&#8217;t cut anything. Yes, we know the bill&#8217;s not paid for, it was said. But the first responders are sooo deserving. Guess what: The same can be said of just about every Washington program. Each has a deserving constituency. No one&#8217;s more consistent than Sen. Coburn in their opposition to that way of thinking. If it occasionally lands him in hot water from a PR standpoint, so be it. He doesn&#8217;t care much about PR, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/22/senator-nos-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P.U.</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/21/p-u/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/21/p-u/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Actual headline, seen on a national cable news network: &#8220;United Nations evacuated for suspicious odor&#8221; (Eye roll.) Next!</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actual headline, seen on a national cable news network: &#8220;United Nations evacuated for suspicious odor&#8221; (Eye roll.) Next!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/21/p-u/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At odds</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/15/at-odds/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/15/at-odds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seeing published remarks by Marine Corps Commandant James F.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing published remarks by Marine Corps Commandant James F. Amos, talking negatively about the possible repeal of the Pentagon&#8217;s &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; policy on gays serving openly in the military, a question comes to mind: What are Amos&#8217; plans after military service? It&#8217;s not the first time Amos has questioned the wisdom of repealing DADT (as the policy is known inside the Beltway). You&#8217;ve got to wonder how many times Amos can be publicly at odds with President Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen on DADT before he gets word that he&#8217;s been invited to a wonderful retirement ceremony at Quantico.</p>
<p>Speaking to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/14/AR2010121404985.html?referrer=emailarticle">newspaper and wire service reporters</a>, Amos said combat service requires such a focus that no distractions can be permitted. He said repealing the policy would harm unit cohesion. A Defense Department survey of armed services personnel found 58 percent of Marine combat unit members said repealing DADT would be a negative (compared to 48 percent in Army combat units). &#8220;The Marines came back and they said, &#8216;Look, anything that&#8217;s going to  break or potentially break that focus and cause any kind of distraction  may have an effect on cohesion,&#8217; &#8221; Amos said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to permit  that opportunity to happen. And I&#8217;ll tell you why. If you go up to  Bethesda [Naval] Hospital &#8230; Marines are up there with no legs, none.  We&#8217;ve got Marines at Walter Reed [Army Medical Center] with no limbs.&#8221; Amos adds that if higher ups repeal the policy he&#8217;ll salute and move smartly to implement changes. But the odds are rising he won&#8217;t get that chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/15/at-odds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Holbrooke</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/13/richard-holbrooke/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/13/richard-holbrooke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. foreign policy community suffered a shocking blow Monday with the death of super special envoy Richard Holbrooke from complications related to weekend surgery to fix a torn aorta.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. foreign policy community suffered a shocking blow Monday with the death of super special envoy Richard Holbrooke from complications related to weekend surgery to fix a torn aorta. Holbrooke was a 45-year diplomatic veteran and one of America&#8217;s ablest emissaries. He was ambassador to the United Nations during President Clinton&#8217;s second term. He was the Obama administration&#8217;s diplomatic point man for Pakistan and Afghanistan. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said Holbrooke&#8217;s work saved lives all over the world. He&#8217;ll be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/13/richard-holbrooke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waterworks</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/13/waterworks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/13/waterworks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner, the next speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, admits he&#8217;s a pretty emotional guy.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner, the next speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, admits he&#8217;s a pretty emotional guy. In a <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504803_162-20025417-10391709.html">segment</a> with CBS&#8217; &#8220;60 Minutes,&#8221; Boehner breaks up a couple of times and tells Lesley Stahl, &#8220;What you see is what you get.&#8221; The mere mention of children, U.S. security, the &#8220;American Dream&#8221; &#8212; his ascendancy to the speakership from working as the night janitor at a bar &#8212; all break Boehner up. He&#8217;s not ashamed of it, telling Stahl he&#8217;s comfortable in his own skin. As mentioned in another post, Boehner will be the sharp contrast with Barack Obama, our Cool Cat president. Yet, what of a leader whose face, at a moment&#8217;s notice, looks like it&#8217;s being melted by a heat dish? Maybe Boehner will liberate a lot of closet-crying men out there, tough guys who need help being comfortable in their own skins. Stahl thinks America will like Boehner&#8217;s crying. Maybe. Or maybe, after a few months of a watery-eyed Boehner, we&#8217;ll all wish former Marine/actor R. Lee Ermey would stop by Boehner&#8217;s office with a box of tissues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/13/waterworks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-optimal optics</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/11/non-optimal-optics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/11/non-optimal-optics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see: You&#8217;re the president of the United States, in the unenviable position of having to defend your tax plan against your own party.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see: You&#8217;re the president of the United States, in the unenviable position of having to defend your tax plan <em>against your own party.</em> So you call in the Big Tuna of re-enforcements: former President Bill Clinton. The two of you meet, you set your stra-tee-gery (as W. liked to say it) and you go out to meet the press, which is in a froth for some red meat. Things are going well. The big guy has &#8216;em eating out of his hand, and in the process he&#8217;s letting Democrats know they better back your tax deal or risk being blamed for unleashing the economy from hell on America. But then a question comes your way, you check your watch and announce you&#8217;ve got to leave. The first lady is waiting. You head for the briefing room door, leaving the Tuna with the press while America gets the idea Mrs. Obama is tugging your leash. The optics? Not so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/11/non-optimal-optics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last shriek?</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/09/the-last-shriek/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/09/the-last-shriek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. House Democrats say the White House&#8217;s tax compromise with Republicans is a bridge too far for them.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. House Democrats say the White House&#8217;s tax compromise with Republicans is a bridge too far for them. On Thursday the Democratic caucus held a non-binding vote rejecting President Obama&#8217;s tax deal that would keep income tax rates where they&#8217;ve been for the better part of the past decade. The deal also would temporarily lower the payroll tax and extend unemployment benefits. The last shriek of a House Democratic majority that&#8217;s about to go poof, or a rallying cry for progressives and liberals throughout the land? If taxes go up on all Americans in January, the backwash against Democrats might be fearful. &#8220;A clear majority of the U.S. House of Representatives supports this   plan,&#8221; Rep. Dan Boren, D-Muskogee, said in a statement. &#8220;We are allowing   the liberal wing of the Democratic caucus to hold these critically   needed tax cuts hostage.&#8221; Maybe, but not for long. Even if Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her loyalists fight it out on last stand hill, you&#8217;ve got to think the new Republican majority&#8217;s first agenda item will be taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/09/the-last-shriek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. Rogers&#8217; neighborhood</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/08/mr-rogers-neighborhood/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/08/mr-rogers-neighborhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The incoming chairman of the U.S. House Appropriations Committee is &#8230; Rep.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The incoming chairman of the U.S. House Appropriations Committee is &#8230; Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Ky. Rogers is the pick of the Republican steering committee over Rep. Jerry Lewis of California in a contest between two veteran appropriators. The full GOP caucus was scheduled to vote on all chairmen Wednesday. Rep. Jack Kingston of Georgia was favored for appropriations by tea party groups, but really, it was Rogers vs. Lewis &#8212; who would&#8217;ve needed a waiver of GOP term-limit rules on committee chairmen to take the gavel. In terms of the recent elections, neither Rogers nor Lewis looks especially responsive to the anti-Washington, anti-spending wave that rolled through in last month&#8217;s elections. Both are Beltway insiders, and cynics have a point when they say each has piled up so many earmarks during their careers that entrusting either with the helm of the House&#8217;s chief spending committee looks dubious &#8212; that is, if the idea is to cut federal spending. Rogers has said he got the message on spending from the mid-terms. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/08/mr-rogers-neighborhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issue of conscience</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/02/potential-sin-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/02/potential-sin-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If Congress repeals the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; policy that effectively bars gays from serving openly in the armed forces, no one will be more affected than the military&#8217;s chaplains.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Congress repeals the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; policy that effectively bars gays from serving openly in the armed forces, no one will be more affected than the military&#8217;s chaplains. The Pentagon&#8217;s report on the potential effects of repealing the policy notes that some chaplains &#8220;condemn in the  strongest possible terms homosexuality as a sin and an abomination, and  inform us that they would refuse to in any way support, comfort, or  assist someone they knew to be homosexual.&#8221; Not all chaplains feel that way, of course, but clearly a policy change would have ramifications for the spiritual role chaplains play. Among those most opposed to lifting the policy are Catholic chaplains, ministering to service members who comprise about 20 percent of the armed forces, according to The Washington Post.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to predict what will happen if the policy is changed. Most likely, some chaplains will welcome the change, others will adjust and still others will leave the service rather than do anything they would consider a faith compromise. &#8220;If there&#8217;s no protection for the chaplain to be  able to speak  according to his faith group, that might affect the number  of chaplains  we recruit or our ability to do our duty for the troops,&#8221; the Rev. Douglas Lee, a retired Presbyterian Air Force chaplain and brigadier general, told The Post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/12/02/potential-sin-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bristol: Third</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/11/24/bristol-third/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/11/24/bristol-third/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Right-Wing Conspiracy? Bah, humbug! If it was as powerful as Hillary Clinton alleges, Bristol Palin would&#8217;ve won &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; Tuesday night.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right-Wing Conspiracy? Bah, humbug! If it was as powerful as Hillary Clinton alleges, Bristol Palin would&#8217;ve won &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; Tuesday night. But she didn&#8217;t. She and partner Kyle Massey finished third behind winning couple Jennifer Grey and Derek Hough. But not before lots of Americans became convinced votes from tea partiers were keeping Palin on the show even as she received lower scores from judges than other competitors who got the boot.</p>
<p>The Washington Post&#8217;s Sally Quinn penned a funny <a href="http://onfaith.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/sally_quinn/2010/11/the_unholy_election_of_bristol_palin.html">column</a> recently describing her angst as Palin survived week after week while better dancers got sent home. &#8220;This could be a metaphor for things to come,&#8221; Quinn wrote. &#8220;Sarah Palin is a force to  be reckoned with and if her supporters can influence a TV show of 23  million viewers they can have more serious influence on elections. And  if they can mobilize the religious right then the Democrats better pay  attention and start dancing as fast as they can.&#8221; Ultimately, Grey prevailed. Of course, Grey is a ringer. Her dad is famed danceman Joel Grey and she starred in &#8220;Dirty Dancing&#8221; with Patrick Swayze in 1987. Takes a lot more than the mythical RWC to overcome bloodlines and professional talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/scissortales/2010/11/24/bristol-third/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
