Budget bonanza

President Barack Obama’s $3.55 trillion budget for fiscal year 2010 is a whopper. There’s $1.7 trillion in red ink in the plan — more than three times the previous record. It claims it would chop the deficit to $533 billion by 2013, largely through tax increases on the wealthy and businesses. Conceptually, the budget signals Obama’s plan to boldly project the federal government into health care, education and energy, among other things.

Republicans quickly hit the budget as wasteful and said tax increases Obama proposes are wrong for the country during a recession. Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire credited the administration for including the cost of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in the budget. But the White House also did some creative accounting with the war, Gregg said, counting as savings the war’s cost over several years even though Obama already has said combat troops will be leaving Iraq by August 2010.

Certainly, presidential budgets tend to be political documents. Congress routinely stashes them in the circular file and writes its own blueprint. Still, the budget reflects priorities. Obama’s is spending the country out of the recession and then some — making massive investments in health care, clean energies and education.

Republicans are in a weak position to criticize, considering the deficit spending during the Bush administration. But by most accounts, Obama’s proposed spending is in a different league altogether. ” If you begin to look at what’s happened over the last month and what’s being proposed in this budget, the president is beginning to make President Bush look like a piker,” House GOP Leader John Boehner said. For those keeping score, the stock market greeted Obama’s budget by losing another 88 points.

Categorized under:

Thank you for joining our conversation on ScissorTales. We encourage your discussion but ask that you stay within the bounds of our commenting and posting policy.

Comments

What is interesting is how you disregard the fact that Obama’s budget accurately reflects the spending the federal government is doing as compared to Bush who used accounting tricks and supplementals to hide the true cost of his administration.

The budget is full of red ink because the past eight years of Bush have squandered the wealth of the American people. At least Obama is pushing for government that actually works for people, rather than letting them drown, literally and figuratively.

Katrina exposed the failed ideologies of the right-wing and Republicans. Government has a purpose, and that purpose is not to enrich the wealthy, but to serve the common good. But why talk about that when you can talk about how crazy the budget is by repeating Republicans exclusively. How about asking American non-politicians struggling to get by what they think?

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


*