<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Physician-lawmaker offers health care reform suggestions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/politics/2009/07/22/physician-lawmaker-offers-health-care-reform-suggestions/feed/?skip_red=True" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/politics/2009/07/22/physician-lawmaker-offers-health-care-reform-suggestions/</link>
	<description>Poltical and government coverage from NewsOK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spider plants</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/politics/2009/07/22/physician-lawmaker-offers-health-care-reform-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>spider plants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/capitolbureau/?p=427#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for the article! You saved me a lot of precious time deciding what direction to go,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the article! You saved me a lot of precious time deciding what direction to go,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Stoltz</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/politics/2009/07/22/physician-lawmaker-offers-health-care-reform-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Stoltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/capitolbureau/?p=427#comment-203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This idea ( proposal ) is for cutting cost and providing better care for Medicare and Medicaid recipients.  I see this idea benefiting those of us outside Medicare, Medicaid by maybe stabilizing and possible lowering our tax rate in the future. I believe the best and quickest bet for now, tort reform. Along with my idea.

We have ( We the people ) Social Security Offices, Welfare offices……

I propose we build our own Medicare, Medicaid, Hospitals for our Medicare, Medicaid recipients in each and every County, Parrish, and District..

There are about 3114 Counties Parishes, Districts ect….. in the United States.

If we could build a forty five bed 15,000 square foot Medicare, Medicaid Hospital at 200 dollars a square foot. It would cost three million dollars for one Hospital. Now add another three million to complete it. Our Medicare, Medicaid hospital with 45 beds would come in at six million dollars. We could build a Medicare, Medicaid Hospital in every county in the entire United States for 18,684,000,000 Lets call it Twenty Billion with the leg work. One architect, one low cost design.

Now some counties will have more population than others. I’m aware of that. So for fun let’s double the number of Medicare Medicaid Hospitals and spread it out later. We now have 30,000 Square foot and ninety beds per county. Cost to build, Forty Billion Dollars. Perhaps we could use some of that Stimulus Money to put people to work building for but a short time.

Now I don’t know what the true average cost for nightly care in a public hospital or what we might be paying for it is. But I know this. If we saved 400 dollars per day per patient per room with our Medicare, Medicaid Hospital we would save 40,917,960,000 That pays for our Hospitals in one year. Do the math. That’s Forty Billion return in one year.

Now lets build our own manufacturing plant in say Michigan? We build our own Hospital Beds, Wheel Chairs, Walkers, ect. We now ship them to our Medicare, Medicaid Hospital to distribute and be returned when no longer needed. We just did away with rental costs and who knows how much fraud.

We could have our own diagnostic equipment and pharmacy right there in our own Medicare, Medicaid Hospital.  No more paying two, three times the cost.

Now about staffing the thing. How many I wonder have the gifted IQ to become a physician and not the funds. My idea would be to give free education along with room and board. Same goes for the nurses. You can quit us only with all educational and boarding moneys up front, in full, and with interest. For now we staff it best we can.

All in all Medicare Medicaid Reform can be had here.


Medicare, Medicaid nursing home anyone?

Dale Stoltz
Jacksonville Texas.
American.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This idea ( proposal ) is for cutting cost and providing better care for Medicare and Medicaid recipients.  I see this idea benefiting those of us outside Medicare, Medicaid by maybe stabilizing and possible lowering our tax rate in the future. I believe the best and quickest bet for now, tort reform. Along with my idea.</p>
<p>We have ( We the people ) Social Security Offices, Welfare offices……</p>
<p>I propose we build our own Medicare, Medicaid, Hospitals for our Medicare, Medicaid recipients in each and every County, Parrish, and District..</p>
<p>There are about 3114 Counties Parishes, Districts ect….. in the United States.</p>
<p>If we could build a forty five bed 15,000 square foot Medicare, Medicaid Hospital at 200 dollars a square foot. It would cost three million dollars for one Hospital. Now add another three million to complete it. Our Medicare, Medicaid hospital with 45 beds would come in at six million dollars. We could build a Medicare, Medicaid Hospital in every county in the entire United States for 18,684,000,000 Lets call it Twenty Billion with the leg work. One architect, one low cost design.</p>
<p>Now some counties will have more population than others. I’m aware of that. So for fun let’s double the number of Medicare Medicaid Hospitals and spread it out later. We now have 30,000 Square foot and ninety beds per county. Cost to build, Forty Billion Dollars. Perhaps we could use some of that Stimulus Money to put people to work building for but a short time.</p>
<p>Now I don’t know what the true average cost for nightly care in a public hospital or what we might be paying for it is. But I know this. If we saved 400 dollars per day per patient per room with our Medicare, Medicaid Hospital we would save 40,917,960,000 That pays for our Hospitals in one year. Do the math. That’s Forty Billion return in one year.</p>
<p>Now lets build our own manufacturing plant in say Michigan? We build our own Hospital Beds, Wheel Chairs, Walkers, ect. We now ship them to our Medicare, Medicaid Hospital to distribute and be returned when no longer needed. We just did away with rental costs and who knows how much fraud.</p>
<p>We could have our own diagnostic equipment and pharmacy right there in our own Medicare, Medicaid Hospital.  No more paying two, three times the cost.</p>
<p>Now about staffing the thing. How many I wonder have the gifted IQ to become a physician and not the funds. My idea would be to give free education along with room and board. Same goes for the nurses. You can quit us only with all educational and boarding moneys up front, in full, and with interest. For now we staff it best we can.</p>
<p>All in all Medicare Medicaid Reform can be had here.</p>
<p>Medicare, Medicaid nursing home anyone?</p>
<p>Dale Stoltz<br />
Jacksonville Texas.<br />
American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/politics/2009/07/22/physician-lawmaker-offers-health-care-reform-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/capitolbureau/?p=427#comment-201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As to solution #1.  Let&#039;s apply that same rationale to auto insurance.  Let&#039;s say I drink a fifth of Jack Daniels, hop onto the closest interstate cross the median, accelerate to 90 MPH, turn off my headlights and let go of the steering wheel.  I (quite predictably) have a head on collision with one of your loved ones, causing grievous injuries or death.

Under Representative Cox&#039;s regime, aside from the definite criminal liability I&#039;d face, I wouldn&#039;t be responsible for the probably $1million or higher damages I caused through my reckless and wanton behavior.  That&#039;d be all based on the insurance contract between the victim and her insurer.

These ideas are dangerous.  They encourage the worst doctors in the United States to practice in Oklahoma.  Instead of encouraging &quot;defensive medicine,&quot; which is a myth, this regime would encourage reckless medicine.  Finally, doctors could concentrate on what really matters -- profit.  The patient?  Whether they live or die?  Whether the doctor screws up and kills the patient?  So what?  Not their problem.

The rest of this stuff is no big deal, even great.  But allowing and encouraging doctors to practice negligent and reckless medicine is a dangerous idea which would kill people if implemented.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to solution #1.  Let&#8217;s apply that same rationale to auto insurance.  Let&#8217;s say I drink a fifth of Jack Daniels, hop onto the closest interstate cross the median, accelerate to 90 MPH, turn off my headlights and let go of the steering wheel.  I (quite predictably) have a head on collision with one of your loved ones, causing grievous injuries or death.</p>
<p>Under Representative Cox&#8217;s regime, aside from the definite criminal liability I&#8217;d face, I wouldn&#8217;t be responsible for the probably $1million or higher damages I caused through my reckless and wanton behavior.  That&#8217;d be all based on the insurance contract between the victim and her insurer.</p>
<p>These ideas are dangerous.  They encourage the worst doctors in the United States to practice in Oklahoma.  Instead of encouraging &#8220;defensive medicine,&#8221; which is a myth, this regime would encourage reckless medicine.  Finally, doctors could concentrate on what really matters &#8212; profit.  The patient?  Whether they live or die?  Whether the doctor screws up and kills the patient?  So what?  Not their problem.</p>
<p>The rest of this stuff is no big deal, even great.  But allowing and encouraging doctors to practice negligent and reckless medicine is a dangerous idea which would kill people if implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/politics/2009/07/22/physician-lawmaker-offers-health-care-reform-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/capitolbureau/?p=427#comment-202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the idea of the first solution.  That is how the offices were run in the past.  This would have a couple of benefits, first the patient would see how much their health care costs by actually having to pay money for their care.  It would start to eliminate the idea that health care is free.  This mindset has grown through the years, and is not true.  This would force the patient to seek medical care when needed which should bring down costs.  Secondly, it would relieve the physician offices of expensive personel and wasted time chasing down money that they deserve. By reducing doctor overhead, that will offset the decrease in payments that are inevitable with healthcare reform.  It is a good start, but only the beginning.  The truth is congress is trying to move so fast, they won&#039;t make it better, but actually make it worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of the first solution.  That is how the offices were run in the past.  This would have a couple of benefits, first the patient would see how much their health care costs by actually having to pay money for their care.  It would start to eliminate the idea that health care is free.  This mindset has grown through the years, and is not true.  This would force the patient to seek medical care when needed which should bring down costs.  Secondly, it would relieve the physician offices of expensive personel and wasted time chasing down money that they deserve. By reducing doctor overhead, that will offset the decrease in payments that are inevitable with healthcare reform.  It is a good start, but only the beginning.  The truth is congress is trying to move so fast, they won&#8217;t make it better, but actually make it worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
