Comments on: Why we’re covering the Sonics http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/ Behind the scenes at The Oklahoman's sports desk Fri, 03 May 2013 02:20:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 By: Eric http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Eric Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:30:34 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-8 Clay and “his boys” exposed.

Has there ever been a bigger idiot with as much money as Clay has?

read ‘em and weep boys. Good faith effort, my a%#

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004339103_sonicsheds.html

]]> By: NAYSAYING TROLL http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-3 NAYSAYING TROLL Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:49:34 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-3 How about some coverage of how this lying carpetbagger is being worked over in the courts in Seattle? Stay tuned!

]]> By: Johnny Beech http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Johnny Beech Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:27:36 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-5 I certainly agree with you that your coverage of state college sports is “zero or negligible” although that’s probably not what you meant to convey with your comment. Ridiculous.

]]> By: David Hemsath http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-7 David Hemsath Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:21:16 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-7 Whoops. Forgot to type the ‘y.’ Which is ironic, since we already know the true underlying reason ‘why’ you’re really covering the Sonics.

]]> By: David Hemsath http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-6 David Hemsath Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:18:59 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-6 Oh, come on. ou’re being disingenuous and conveniently failing to point out the obvious, which is you’re a shill for the Gaylord and Bennett marketing machines. Assuming the Sonics come to Oklahoma City, you’ve already more than greased the franchise wheels.

]]> By: Martin http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Martin Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:47:19 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-4 Please keep covering the Sonics. But when you get the team
remember what else you have done to the area. You could call the new team the Stealers!

]]> By: Daniel http://blog.newsok.com/openmike/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Daniel Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:59:05 +0000 http://blog.newsok.com/mikesherman/2007/06/28/why-were-covering-the-sonics/#comment-2 I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding Why we’re covering the Sonics, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong :)

]]>