<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting discussion about best-seller lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2011/07/05/interesting-discussion-about-best-seller-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2011/07/05/interesting-discussion-about-best-seller-lists/</link>
	<description>Looking at a little down home literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2011/07/05/interesting-discussion-about-best-seller-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-4888</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/?p=4085#comment-4888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I basically agree, but don&#039;t the bestseller lists lead to more people reading the same books, leading to more discussion of those books? Maybe the NYT and other list makers need to come up with more lists instead of just the bestsellers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I basically agree, but don&#8217;t the bestseller lists lead to more people reading the same books, leading to more discussion of those books? Maybe the NYT and other list makers need to come up with more lists instead of just the bestsellers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
