Let’s have the Conversation
This post is about an article sent to me by Young Bill, out of Library Journal, a publication for librarians, resplendent with reviews and library news. Every Reader a Reviewer: The Online Book Conversation by Barbara Hoffert.
Book reviewers used to be the learned literary voice speaking to us from the Book Review pages of magazines and newspapers. They were what librarians like to call “subject specialists” in their particular reviewing field. Many were very good, and every librarian still reads reviews from magazines like; Library Journal, Choice, and Publishers Weekly in order to pick titles for their collections. However, reading some literary reviews made you think the reviewer had swallowed the thesaurus whole. Absolutely stunning reviews about the literary worth of a book that a librarian would know would never check out because it was insanely boring.
So just like the revolution in music, the industry now recognizing the power of wildly popular musicians on YouTube. Book reviewing on sites like Good Reads, or personal blogs is the power of the people getting to pick. To me it started with “DorothyL“, the very popular listserv of mystery readers coming together to talk mysteries; share in a like minded community and pass aroung the good titles among themselves. It gave voice to reader opinions.
I think that’s what most of us book review bloggers do, we give opinions, we share our likes and dislikes, we read and want everyone to read. I like to share events and talk about books. I don’t think I’m in the same category as the reviewer for the New York Times Book Review. I think my job is to make reading accessible and enjoyable. I’m just as comfortable reading Amanda McCabe’s Scandalous Brides, or Patricia Briggs’ Bone Crossed as I am reading Michael Lewis’ The Big Short or Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. I like to read, it’s that simple.
For my own personal reading, I prefer the book bloggers, usually I’m picking people who have similar taste in books. I want to see what they have to say, what they pick up next. If I need to know what book is the best authority on a given topic, then I go to the experts in the field. To me all the book buzz on the internet is just like the Metropolitan Library System book sale and the line snaking around the building to get in, “Who knew all these people were reading? I guess reading isn’t dead after all.”
Thank you for joining our conversation on Okie Reads. We encourage your discussion but ask that you stay within the bounds of our commenting and posting policy.
Comments
How-do….I need to say something, but first a Disclaimer: I’m NOT brown-nosing!
Kitty, I agree with you about the thesaurus’s over-use by what I call “high brow book reviewers”. Although I don’t see evidence of that in the reviews written by you and by young Bill, I do see an everyday kind of eloquence by both of you in your writing styles, and I like it! It makes reading y’all’s reevu’s (oops, forgot who I was speaking to)….It makes reading your reviews on both Oakie Reads and Reading Oklahoma an “afternoon delight” (borrowing some words from the Starland Vocal Band). Have actually been reading some books you and Bill have recommended that a year ago would not have been on my waiting-to-read list. Haven’t been let down by any of them, either. So, Kudo’s and keep on reviewing.
~~vehoae


Yeah, it’s really interesting that this brave new information age gives everybody the chance to share their opinions. It’s especially great when it comes to reading, because you can pretty much book talk with people on the other side of the continent.
I think I’m gonna join Good Reads this weekend. Can I fit it into all of the other social networking I’m doing now? I don’t know. Stay tuned!