<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books That Made a Difference:  The Language of Lolita</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/</link>
	<description>Looking at a little down home literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Literary Site of the Week: 100 Best English Language Novels from 1923 to 2005 &#124; Okie Reads</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/comment-page-1/#comment-7727</link>
		<dc:creator>Literary Site of the Week: 100 Best English Language Novels from 1923 to 2005 &#124; Okie Reads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/?p=1995#comment-7727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov (Okie Reads post on Lolita) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov (Okie Reads post on Lolita) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Bill Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/comment-page-1/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Bill Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/?p=1995#comment-2202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment, Kitty. You know, my niece just adores The Great Gatsby, and she said she tries to read it once a year.

I will say I like re-reading passages of certain books for the artistry of the words, or the idea that is convened. But generally, for me, re-reading books is not a particularly successful activity. The problem? I want to re-create that feeling I felt when I was reading the book the first time, and it is just never the same. I know that sounds weird: how could it ever be the same? But for whatever reason, I always leave a re-read feeling a little let down.

Now, having said that, I *do* re-read favorite short stories, and never seem to have the feeling of disappointment. What&#039;s that all about?!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Kitty. You know, my niece just adores The Great Gatsby, and she said she tries to read it once a year.</p>
<p>I will say I like re-reading passages of certain books for the artistry of the words, or the idea that is convened. But generally, for me, re-reading books is not a particularly successful activity. The problem? I want to re-create that feeling I felt when I was reading the book the first time, and it is just never the same. I know that sounds weird: how could it ever be the same? But for whatever reason, I always leave a re-read feeling a little let down.</p>
<p>Now, having said that, I *do* re-read favorite short stories, and never seem to have the feeling of disappointment. What&#8217;s that all about?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitty</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/comment-page-1/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/?p=1995#comment-2201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s weird when you start thinking about something and the next thing you know you happen on an article about the very thing. I was going to comment on your Lolita saying the book for me is Fitzgerald&#039;s The Great Gatsby. Every word is precise and just the way it should be. I still recall his description of the &quot;eyes of Doctor T.H Eckleburg&quot;, looming over the gray landscape, blue and gigantic. And then I happened on this article, also perfect and precise.
http://www.themillions.com/2010/08/the-great-gatsby-revisited.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s weird when you start thinking about something and the next thing you know you happen on an article about the very thing. I was going to comment on your Lolita saying the book for me is Fitzgerald&#8217;s The Great Gatsby. Every word is precise and just the way it should be. I still recall his description of the &#8220;eyes of Doctor T.H Eckleburg&#8221;, looming over the gray landscape, blue and gigantic. And then I happened on this article, also perfect and precise.<br />
<a href="http://www.themillions.com/2010/08/the-great-gatsby-revisited.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.themillions.com/2010/08/the-great-gatsby-revisited.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Bill Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/comment-page-1/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Bill Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/?p=1995#comment-2180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t remember Lolita being dense, per se, but &quot;weird&quot; seems like a good description. It certainly was a groundbreaker, and that can appear odd at the time. 

I do know that I read Lolita during a time in my life (college and post college years) where I thought I should be reading books that were good for my mind. (What a laugh!) In the process, I discovered some real gems——Thomas Hardy&#039;s Return of the Native, Lolita, and the plays of Shaw, O&#039;Neil, Hellman, Wilde, and Ebsen. I also had some painful experiences, notably with Henry James&#039; Washington Square, which was the first book I didn&#039;t finish reading. (Yeah, I was one of those oddballs who thought they should finish every book they started. This was eons before Nancy Pearl&#039;s Rule of 50. Well, Washington Square put an end to that nonsense!)

As far as teenage girls making the world go &#039;round, I will take your word for it, Sadie—although I have suspected this was the case for some time now. LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember Lolita being dense, per se, but &#8220;weird&#8221; seems like a good description. It certainly was a groundbreaker, and that can appear odd at the time. </p>
<p>I do know that I read Lolita during a time in my life (college and post college years) where I thought I should be reading books that were good for my mind. (What a laugh!) In the process, I discovered some real gems——Thomas Hardy&#8217;s Return of the Native, Lolita, and the plays of Shaw, O&#8217;Neil, Hellman, Wilde, and Ebsen. I also had some painful experiences, notably with Henry James&#8217; Washington Square, which was the first book I didn&#8217;t finish reading. (Yeah, I was one of those oddballs who thought they should finish every book they started. This was eons before Nancy Pearl&#8217;s Rule of 50. Well, Washington Square put an end to that nonsense!)</p>
<p>As far as teenage girls making the world go &#8217;round, I will take your word for it, Sadie—although I have suspected this was the case for some time now. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadie</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/2010/08/27/books-that-made-a-difference-the-language-of-lolita/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okiereads/?p=1995#comment-2179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intriguing! I&#039;ve never read Lolita.It always seemed so weird and dense. Can there really be that much to say about young teenage girls? Of course, then I see most pop culture and think &#039;yes of course there is, teenage girls make the world go round.&#039;

I will have to read Lolita now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intriguing! I&#8217;ve never read Lolita.It always seemed so weird and dense. Can there really be that much to say about young teenage girls? Of course, then I see most pop culture and think &#8216;yes of course there is, teenage girls make the world go round.&#8217;</p>
<p>I will have to read Lolita now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
