<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another One-Story Building for Lower Bricktown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/09/17/another-one-story-building-for-lower-bricktown-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/09/17/another-one-story-building-for-lower-bricktown-2/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry OKC</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/09/17/another-one-story-building-for-lower-bricktown-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43924</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry OKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8330#comment-43924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His excuse about a bigger/2 story building requiring more parking doesn&#039;t really make any sense. Why cant he build it like the 2nd rendering, give the appearance of a 2-story building (ala Toby Keiths). Also, doesn&#039;t he want the place to be successful? That means getting the most people thru the door, even if it might mean building a structured parking facility nearby.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His excuse about a bigger/2 story building requiring more parking doesn&#8217;t really make any sense. Why cant he build it like the 2nd rendering, give the appearance of a 2-story building (ala Toby Keiths). Also, doesn&#8217;t he want the place to be successful? That means getting the most people thru the door, even if it might mean building a structured parking facility nearby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/09/17/another-one-story-building-for-lower-bricktown-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43901</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8330#comment-43901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only was Lower Bricktown Hogan&#039;s first entertainment district, it was the first in OKC in a long time.  Mistakes were made and those should be acknowledged.  This proposal should be denied and a new development plan created for this area that fits with what we know about urban planning and creating sense of place today.  The only thing worse than a bad plan, is staying committed to that bad plan.

I also can&#039;t help but think how this relates to the new boulevard west of downtown (assuming the elevated portion is scrapped).  Some people want the boulevard to be a parkway with grassy setbacks and wide medians.  They often cite Ben Franklin Parkway as a model.  Well, Lower Bricktown is what the new boulevard will look like if they go that route – and if they don’t like Lower Bricktown, why would we duplicate it elsewhere?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only was Lower Bricktown Hogan&#8217;s first entertainment district, it was the first in OKC in a long time.  Mistakes were made and those should be acknowledged.  This proposal should be denied and a new development plan created for this area that fits with what we know about urban planning and creating sense of place today.  The only thing worse than a bad plan, is staying committed to that bad plan.</p>
<p>I also can&#8217;t help but think how this relates to the new boulevard west of downtown (assuming the elevated portion is scrapped).  Some people want the boulevard to be a parkway with grassy setbacks and wide medians.  They often cite Ben Franklin Parkway as a model.  Well, Lower Bricktown is what the new boulevard will look like if they go that route – and if they don’t like Lower Bricktown, why would we duplicate it elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/09/17/another-one-story-building-for-lower-bricktown-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43900</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8330#comment-43900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are they intent upon suburbanizing lower Bricktown with low-density buildings? It&#039;s starting to look like the sea of pad sites on I-40 between the outlet mall and Meridian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are they intent upon suburbanizing lower Bricktown with low-density buildings? It&#8217;s starting to look like the sea of pad sites on I-40 between the outlet mall and Meridian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Burgess</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/09/17/another-one-story-building-for-lower-bricktown-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43898</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8330#comment-43898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So very glad you wrote this Steve.  I hope that the Urban Renewal Authority does not approve this proposal as defined.  It lacks any context with the canal, which was why there was a land deal with Hogan to begin with. 

TMK/Hogan and Edwards Theatres Circuits Inc. paid $3 million for the land they will use, but the Urban Redevelopment Authority put that $3 million back into development of amenities along the canal. &quot;You could say they got free land,&quot; said Stoll.

Also, &quot;This is our first entertainment center,&quot; Hogan said.

http://www.specialtyretail.net/issues/dec98/Entertainments_OK.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So very glad you wrote this Steve.  I hope that the Urban Renewal Authority does not approve this proposal as defined.  It lacks any context with the canal, which was why there was a land deal with Hogan to begin with. </p>
<p>TMK/Hogan and Edwards Theatres Circuits Inc. paid $3 million for the land they will use, but the Urban Redevelopment Authority put that $3 million back into development of amenities along the canal. &#8220;You could say they got free land,&#8221; said Stoll.</p>
<p>Also, &#8220;This is our first entertainment center,&#8221; Hogan said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.specialtyretail.net/issues/dec98/Entertainments_OK.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.specialtyretail.net/issues/dec98/Entertainments_OK.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
