<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flashback: Route Chosen for New Interstate 40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friends for a Better Boulevard - Page 58</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-47490</link>
		<dc:creator>Friends for a Better Boulevard - Page 58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-47490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] last night I&#039;d really encourage people to first re-read Steve&#039;s Flashback piece from December 1998 (http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40) when the I-40 relocation route was chosen. It&#039;s also worth reading Steve&#039;s piece from the end of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last night I&#039;d really encourage people to first re-read Steve&#039;s Flashback piece from December 1998 (<a href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40" rel="nofollow">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40</a>) when the I-40 relocation route was chosen. It&#039;s also worth reading Steve&#039;s piece from the end of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Elmore</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-45899</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Elmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-45899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve --

My profound gratitude to you for republishing this story.

My colleagues and I -- who burned up a lot of our years opposing the unnecessary destruction of OKC Union Station with everything we had -- stand today on the verity of our charges and assertions, now sadly borne-out by ODOT&#039;s ugly work.

Yes -- ODOT admits &quot;$700 million,&quot; but the project is not finished -- and the price of replacing what was mindlessly, treacherously destroyed is as yet unknown. True price is pretty well certain to top $1.5 billion -- here in the land of &quot;all of these conservatives.&quot; 

What are they &quot;conserving?&quot; 

It wasn&#039;t Oklahoma City&#039;s historic, long standing landmarks. It wasn&#039;t wasn&#039;t &quot;the last, grand, capital-city rail passenger center in the West with all its original train-handling space intact.&quot; 

It certainly wasn&#039;t &quot;taxpayer dollars,&quot; as Utah Ernie Istook likes to say.

Nor was it our former wealth of irreplaceable rail connections to places like Tinker AFB and Will Rogers Airport from downtown.

What WAS &quot;conserved&quot; was the place of ODOT&#039;s cadre of favored-highway-contractors at the public trough -- oh, yes -- and the well-deserved reputation of OKC leadership to trample the poor and minorities.

Meanwhile, despite all the hoopla, not one thing of practical benefit to the working people of Oklahoma has changed in OKC over the last 20 years -- except the loss of readily, cheaply-convertible rail transportation options that would have been of immense benefit to us all.

Keep on telling the truth, friend. Oklahomans need to hear it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211;</p>
<p>My profound gratitude to you for republishing this story.</p>
<p>My colleagues and I &#8212; who burned up a lot of our years opposing the unnecessary destruction of OKC Union Station with everything we had &#8212; stand today on the verity of our charges and assertions, now sadly borne-out by ODOT&#8217;s ugly work.</p>
<p>Yes &#8212; ODOT admits &#8220;$700 million,&#8221; but the project is not finished &#8212; and the price of replacing what was mindlessly, treacherously destroyed is as yet unknown. True price is pretty well certain to top $1.5 billion &#8212; here in the land of &#8220;all of these conservatives.&#8221; </p>
<p>What are they &#8220;conserving?&#8221; </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t Oklahoma City&#8217;s historic, long standing landmarks. It wasn&#8217;t wasn&#8217;t &#8220;the last, grand, capital-city rail passenger center in the West with all its original train-handling space intact.&#8221; </p>
<p>It certainly wasn&#8217;t &#8220;taxpayer dollars,&#8221; as Utah Ernie Istook likes to say.</p>
<p>Nor was it our former wealth of irreplaceable rail connections to places like Tinker AFB and Will Rogers Airport from downtown.</p>
<p>What WAS &#8220;conserved&#8221; was the place of ODOT&#8217;s cadre of favored-highway-contractors at the public trough &#8212; oh, yes &#8212; and the well-deserved reputation of OKC leadership to trample the poor and minorities.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, despite all the hoopla, not one thing of practical benefit to the working people of Oklahoma has changed in OKC over the last 20 years &#8212; except the loss of readily, cheaply-convertible rail transportation options that would have been of immense benefit to us all.</p>
<p>Keep on telling the truth, friend. Oklahomans need to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david ball</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-43478</link>
		<dc:creator>david ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-43478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gee, that sure was a nice way to put it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee, that sure was a nice way to put it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeN</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-43476</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-43476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kerry here is a news flash having I-40&#039;s central alignment to deviate so far south is just ludicrous and uninformed at best.  Moving I-40 had been a foregone conclusion even as the original elevated highway was under construction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry here is a news flash having I-40&#8242;s central alignment to deviate so far south is just ludicrous and uninformed at best.  Moving I-40 had been a foregone conclusion even as the original elevated highway was under construction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Waldrop</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-43470</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Waldrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-43470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notice how far under the real final cost the ODOT estimates were in 1998. Actual cost turned out to be nearly $700 million.  How soon we forget.  See also &quot;those who do not learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how far under the real final cost the ODOT estimates were in 1998. Actual cost turned out to be nearly $700 million.  How soon we forget.  See also &#8220;those who do not learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-43456</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-43456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing is for sure - the incompetence and mistakes have been going on for a long time.  I-40 from I-35 to May should have been taken out and replaced with – nothing.  I-40 traffic should have then been re-routed to I-240 then to I-44 and then on an expanded Airport Road and reconnected to the current I-40 out near Yukon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is for sure &#8211; the incompetence and mistakes have been going on for a long time.  I-40 from I-35 to May should have been taken out and replaced with – nothing.  I-40 traffic should have then been re-routed to I-240 then to I-44 and then on an expanded Airport Road and reconnected to the current I-40 out near Yukon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wylie H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-43455</link>
		<dc:creator>Wylie H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-43455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.... very eye-opening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;. very eye-opening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2012/07/29/flashback-route-chosen-for-new-interstate-40/comment-page-1/#comment-43454</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=8138#comment-43454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this. It provides necessary perspective on how things have been done in OKC and Oklahoma historically. Sounds like McCaleb disliked any &quot;sunshine&quot; on back door dealings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this. It provides necessary perspective on how things have been done in OKC and Oklahoma historically. Sounds like McCaleb disliked any &#8220;sunshine&#8221; on back door dealings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
