<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SandRidge Commons News: Late Breaking Developments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/07/23/sandridge-commons-news-late-breaking-developments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/07/23/sandridge-commons-news-late-breaking-developments/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Nick Roberts</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/07/23/sandridge-commons-news-late-breaking-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-12959</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Nick Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=4340#comment-12959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This comes from higher-up than the Planning Dept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comes from higher-up than the Planning Dept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Bryant</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/07/23/sandridge-commons-news-late-breaking-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-12956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=4340#comment-12956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t city staff in favor of Preservation Oklahoma&#039;s position? Why would they want to subvert the vote in favor of SandRidge?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t city staff in favor of Preservation Oklahoma&#8217;s position? Why would they want to subvert the vote in favor of SandRidge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Loudenback</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/07/23/sandridge-commons-news-late-breaking-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Loudenback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=4340#comment-12937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That sounds wrong. 

(1) There were several line items in SandRidge&#039;s proposal before the DDR on April 8. The DDR didn&#039;t completely treat the matter as all or nothing ... one item was approved conditionally ... the motion there was that, &quot;Tanenbaum/Ainsworth [moved, seconded] to approve items 1-4 &lt;b&gt;and approve item 5 contingent with the applicant returning in 90 days with additional information and more complete plans for the new construction of the proposed structure at 120 Robert S Kerr Avenue.&lt;/b&gt;&quot; That the motion broke the items into parcels seems to me to have some significance. [Note: I cannot presently locate the April 8, 2010, Minutes of the DDR at the city&#039;s website, but I saved a copy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/downtowndesignreviewcommittee_minutes.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;which you can read here&lt;/a&gt;.] 

I note, too, that the items were broken into parcels on the DDR&#039;s agenda ... hence the above motion combined items on the DDR&#039;s agenda. See the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/downtowndesignreviewcommittee_minutes.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Staff Report&lt;/a&gt; which also treated the items separately. The point is, the various items were not included as a &quot;package deal&quot; in the first place but were instead presented as several line items in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/boardofadjustment_agenda_4_15_2010.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DDR&#039;s 4/8/2010 agenda&lt;/a&gt;.

Secondly, according to the BOA&#039;s handout at its initial session, &quot;After the case has been fully presented, the Board will vote to approve, approve conditionally, or deny the request. A concurring vote of three members is required to approve, defer or deny &lt;b&gt;AN item&lt;/b&gt;. &quot;An item&quot; doesn&#039;t lend support to an all or nothing approach.

&lt;b&gt;... BUT WAIT ... 

... NEWS FLASH ...&lt;/b&gt; this comment is being interrupted by a report from a NYC radio station which reports that an alien spaceship bearing earth-threatening devices hovering over Oklahoma City has just been reported ala &lt;i&gt;Mercury Theatre on the Air&lt;/i&gt;, performed on October 30, 1938 ...

... &lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;AT LEAST A PAIR OF POSTS IN THIS BLOG HAVE SUDDENLY AND MYSTERIOUSLY DISAPPEARED. &lt;u&gt;IT IS NOT YET KNOWN WHETHER THESE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCES ARE THE RESULT OF TURBULENT SUN SPOTS&lt;/u&gt; (which are known to have an adverse affect upon earth-bound internet communications) &lt;u&gt;OR SOME OTHER UNIVERSAL SINISTER CAUSE&lt;/u&gt; ... OR &lt;U&gt;JUST SOMETHING MORE LOCAL TO THE CITY BUT EQUALLY SINISTER&lt;/U&gt; ... &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;

... Stay tuned ... my understanding is that Orson Wells or his surrogate will be reporting on this occurrence in all probability, as the invasion proceeds ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds wrong. </p>
<p>(1) There were several line items in SandRidge&#8217;s proposal before the DDR on April 8. The DDR didn&#8217;t completely treat the matter as all or nothing &#8230; one item was approved conditionally &#8230; the motion there was that, &#8220;Tanenbaum/Ainsworth [moved, seconded] to approve items 1-4 <b>and approve item 5 contingent with the applicant returning in 90 days with additional information and more complete plans for the new construction of the proposed structure at 120 Robert S Kerr Avenue.</b>&#8221; That the motion broke the items into parcels seems to me to have some significance. [Note: I cannot presently locate the April 8, 2010, Minutes of the DDR at the city's website, but I saved a copy <a href="http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/downtowndesignreviewcommittee_minutes.pdf" rel="nofollow">which you can read here</a>.] </p>
<p>I note, too, that the items were broken into parcels on the DDR&#8217;s agenda &#8230; hence the above motion combined items on the DDR&#8217;s agenda. See the <a href="http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/downtowndesignreviewcommittee_minutes.pdf" rel="nofollow">Staff Report</a> which also treated the items separately. The point is, the various items were not included as a &#8220;package deal&#8221; in the first place but were instead presented as several line items in the <a href="http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/boardofadjustment_agenda_4_15_2010.pdf" rel="nofollow">DDR&#8217;s 4/8/2010 agenda</a>.</p>
<p>Secondly, according to the BOA&#8217;s handout at its initial session, &#8220;After the case has been fully presented, the Board will vote to approve, approve conditionally, or deny the request. A concurring vote of three members is required to approve, defer or deny <b>AN item</b>. &#8220;An item&#8221; doesn&#8217;t lend support to an all or nothing approach.</p>
<p><b>&#8230; BUT WAIT &#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; NEWS FLASH &#8230;</b> this comment is being interrupted by a report from a NYC radio station which reports that an alien spaceship bearing earth-threatening devices hovering over Oklahoma City has just been reported ala <i>Mercury Theatre on the Air</i>, performed on October 30, 1938 &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; <b><i>AT LEAST A PAIR OF POSTS IN THIS BLOG HAVE SUDDENLY AND MYSTERIOUSLY DISAPPEARED. <u>IT IS NOT YET KNOWN WHETHER THESE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCES ARE THE RESULT OF TURBULENT SUN SPOTS</u> (which are known to have an adverse affect upon earth-bound internet communications) <u>OR SOME OTHER UNIVERSAL SINISTER CAUSE</u> &#8230; OR <u>JUST SOMETHING MORE LOCAL TO THE CITY BUT EQUALLY SINISTER</u> &#8230; </i></b></p>
<p>&#8230; Stay tuned &#8230; my understanding is that Orson Wells or his surrogate will be reporting on this occurrence in all probability, as the invasion proceeds &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/07/23/sandridge-commons-news-late-breaking-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-12932</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=4340#comment-12932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is Frank Hill and the City trying to subvert the process.
The BOA commisioners said bluntly that they had the right to consider the building(s) under consideration individually.

captcha: firebreak called]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Frank Hill and the City trying to subvert the process.<br />
The BOA commisioners said bluntly that they had the right to consider the building(s) under consideration individually.</p>
<p>captcha: firebreak called</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
