Is There a Core to Shore Conspiracy?
That’s not my question or comment – it is the question being brought up by Nick Roberts on his latest blog post, as he delves into Tuesday’s city council meeting and the use of the “conspiracy” word by the mayor. Read it here
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
Anyone else flashing back to the pay no attention to the man behind the curtain spiel from a certain wizard?
captcha = of costars
have to love that
Bill,
No problem with the idea of leadership having a “strong conviction and willingness to defend that conviction”. Problem is (along with the Boulevard), there has never been a defense of the conviction. Just their restated belief that this is the best place. But at no point along the way saying, this is the best place because of:
1)
2)
3)
I wish someone would disclose all the motivations the “conspirators” supposedly have which leads to the conspiracy theories. Claims of conspiracy without some real evidence is only paranoia. Just because there are strong opinions from leadership that this should be in a certain place doesn’t mean there is a conspiracy. It could just be a strong conviction and willingness to defend that conviction. We want leaders to lead, and when they do people think it is a conspiracy. Otherwise, let’s just run this city by consensus (which won’t happen). The public needs to be involved and heard and respected as we are paying the bill. But in the end, a hard decision has to be made by the people we have entrusted to do it.