<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now, Back to that &#8220;Old News&#8221; &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7366</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“...If you, for example, are among those who believe that the MAPS 3 ballot was truly a blank slate throughout the summer of 2009 and the items weren’t decided until September, then I can’t see why anyone would worry about this. If, however, you are among those who believe the ballot was pretty much decided behind the scenes as the summer began, then you might also be concerned with how the mayor arrived at the Core to Shore site being the best one when no such conclusion was reached by any expert or group....” -- slackmeyer

Hard to believe it was a “blank slate” since it was supposed to have been put in front of voters a year earlier when it got bumped for the Ford tax vote (3/08). Think the only question then was what to replace the $120M slot formerly occupied by the Ford. 

MAPS 3 was being considered at least as earlier as 7 years ago (2/9/03, when Humphreys was Mayor and Burns Hargis was the head of the Chamber) in this article written by Steve:

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:mPcRKHS2Aa8J:www.mynewsok.com/city-seeks-right-track-for-proposed-rail-system/article/

[Quote]At a recent chamber of commerce retreat, light rail dominated discussions of what could be a future “MAPS 3 to follow the original downtown improvement projects and public school overhaul now under way. Hargis envisions a light rail connecting State Fair Park, Will Rogers World Airport and downtown by the state’s centennial in 2007.[/Quote]

captcha = immersed bull]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“&#8230;If you, for example, are among those who believe that the MAPS 3 ballot was truly a blank slate throughout the summer of 2009 and the items weren’t decided until September, then I can’t see why anyone would worry about this. If, however, you are among those who believe the ballot was pretty much decided behind the scenes as the summer began, then you might also be concerned with how the mayor arrived at the Core to Shore site being the best one when no such conclusion was reached by any expert or group&#8230;.” &#8212; slackmeyer</p>
<p>Hard to believe it was a “blank slate” since it was supposed to have been put in front of voters a year earlier when it got bumped for the Ford tax vote (3/08). Think the only question then was what to replace the $120M slot formerly occupied by the Ford. </p>
<p>MAPS 3 was being considered at least as earlier as 7 years ago (2/9/03, when Humphreys was Mayor and Burns Hargis was the head of the Chamber) in this article written by Steve:</p>
<p><a href="http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:mPcRKHS2Aa8J:www.mynewsok.com/city-seeks-right-track-for-proposed-rail-system/article/" rel="nofollow">http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:mPcRKHS2Aa8J:www.mynewsok.com/city-seeks-right-track-for-proposed-rail-system/article/</a></p>
<p>[Quote]At a recent chamber of commerce retreat, light rail dominated discussions of what could be a future “MAPS 3 to follow the original downtown improvement projects and public school overhaul now under way. Hargis envisions a light rail connecting State Fair Park, Will Rogers World Airport and downtown by the state’s centennial in 2007.[/Quote]</p>
<p>captcha = immersed bull</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7257</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is your definition of &quot;quick,&quot; david? And are today&#039;s leaders really the same ones that pulled us out of the disaster that was the late 1980s? Or do they just sit in the same chairs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your definition of &#8220;quick,&#8221; david? And are today&#8217;s leaders really the same ones that pulled us out of the disaster that was the late 1980s? Or do they just sit in the same chairs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david ball</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7248</link>
		<dc:creator>david ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as this issue keeps getting tossed about, a thought occurs to me regarding the city&#039;s purchase of the property in the &quot;preferred&quot; location.  CTS, in some form or fashion, is going to happen, regardless of the time frame.  the mayor is well aware of the importance of the convention center.  by leaning towards putting it in one location, does that not improve the city&#039;s negotiating power regarding another possible location?  namely, we might get a good deal on either the cotton mill or the lumberyard precisely because we DON&#039;T have to buy it (not to mention the difficulty for the seller in finding another buyer), and we could put the property south of the ford center to another beneficial use?

maybe we should not be so quick to throw rocks and assume the worst in the city leadership that has, so far, gone light years in pulling us out of the disaster that was the late 1980s.  just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as this issue keeps getting tossed about, a thought occurs to me regarding the city&#8217;s purchase of the property in the &#8220;preferred&#8221; location.  CTS, in some form or fashion, is going to happen, regardless of the time frame.  the mayor is well aware of the importance of the convention center.  by leaning towards putting it in one location, does that not improve the city&#8217;s negotiating power regarding another possible location?  namely, we might get a good deal on either the cotton mill or the lumberyard precisely because we DON&#8217;T have to buy it (not to mention the difficulty for the seller in finding another buyer), and we could put the property south of the ford center to another beneficial use?</p>
<p>maybe we should not be so quick to throw rocks and assume the worst in the city leadership that has, so far, gone light years in pulling us out of the disaster that was the late 1980s.  just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the meantime the Mayor is proposing what I guess is a major street race through Bricktown and the OKC central board and its champion have completely ignored it while continuing to repeatedly pound the same agenda-driven issues again and again. Has this horse been plugged enough?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the meantime the Mayor is proposing what I guess is a major street race through Bricktown and the OKC central board and its champion have completely ignored it while continuing to repeatedly pound the same agenda-driven issues again and again. Has this horse been plugged enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Loudenback</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7220</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Loudenback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Casey, I missed your reply,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Doug, to be 100% honest, I haven’t had one discussion with him on the convention center. On the few occasions I get to talk to him the convention center seems to slip my mind. :)

If the best site is the lumber yard site, then I hope it goes there. If the best site is south of the Ford Center, then I hope it goes there. If the best site is…I want what’s best for this city and knowing my dad’s passion for this city and all that he has sacrificed in his life being mayor, I’m sure he wants the same.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We hope for the same thing, Casey. And I share your and your dad&#039;s passion for our city. For each of us, however, to pursue our personal aspirations is not sacrificial in nature and I do disagree with your choice of words in that respect. Pursuing one&#039;s goals, whatever those goals may be, merely represents an individual choice about doing what one feels strongly about doing and individually sets out to do. The personal reward is either in the accomplishment, or at least in the attempt to accomplish, whatever the personal goals may be. In that context, there is no sacrifice. There is only the self-satisfaction for doing one&#039;s best, and that is enough.

All that verbiage aside, make no mistake from my remarks: 

I regard what your dad has accomplished as mayor of your and my city in the highest regard. Among other things, he was the closer on the Skirvin Hilton project; he was critically important, probably paramount, in the Hornets temporary location here which was step one in the path which no one could then say where it would lead; and, ultimately, in his leadership concerning the Ford Center sales tax vote which paved the way for the city hosting the team which would be named the Thunder. Without that leadership, I am of the firm opinion that our city would not have a professional NBA team today. Our city owes your father much for what he has done and that fact is not lost on me for a moment.

It would not be a bad thing, though, for him to lay out the reasons for locating the convention center south of the Ford Center. Many in this city are hungering for an open discussion, ideas pro and con. I want your dad to lead the way in the discussion, and, in the end, for a consensus to emerge. That next step, though, is not up to me, is it.

OK?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey, I missed your reply,</p>
<blockquote><p>Doug, to be 100% honest, I haven’t had one discussion with him on the convention center. On the few occasions I get to talk to him the convention center seems to slip my mind. <img src='http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If the best site is the lumber yard site, then I hope it goes there. If the best site is south of the Ford Center, then I hope it goes there. If the best site is…I want what’s best for this city and knowing my dad’s passion for this city and all that he has sacrificed in his life being mayor, I’m sure he wants the same.</p></blockquote>
<p>We hope for the same thing, Casey. And I share your and your dad&#8217;s passion for our city. For each of us, however, to pursue our personal aspirations is not sacrificial in nature and I do disagree with your choice of words in that respect. Pursuing one&#8217;s goals, whatever those goals may be, merely represents an individual choice about doing what one feels strongly about doing and individually sets out to do. The personal reward is either in the accomplishment, or at least in the attempt to accomplish, whatever the personal goals may be. In that context, there is no sacrifice. There is only the self-satisfaction for doing one&#8217;s best, and that is enough.</p>
<p>All that verbiage aside, make no mistake from my remarks: </p>
<p>I regard what your dad has accomplished as mayor of your and my city in the highest regard. Among other things, he was the closer on the Skirvin Hilton project; he was critically important, probably paramount, in the Hornets temporary location here which was step one in the path which no one could then say where it would lead; and, ultimately, in his leadership concerning the Ford Center sales tax vote which paved the way for the city hosting the team which would be named the Thunder. Without that leadership, I am of the firm opinion that our city would not have a professional NBA team today. Our city owes your father much for what he has done and that fact is not lost on me for a moment.</p>
<p>It would not be a bad thing, though, for him to lay out the reasons for locating the convention center south of the Ford Center. Many in this city are hungering for an open discussion, ideas pro and con. I want your dad to lead the way in the discussion, and, in the end, for a consensus to emerge. That next step, though, is not up to me, is it.</p>
<p>OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnathon</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems rather obvious that the Mayor has been caught on record lying. Yes, I said it because everyone else has just hinted at it. The questions is what special interest is he serving?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems rather obvious that the Mayor has been caught on record lying. Yes, I said it because everyone else has just hinted at it. The questions is what special interest is he serving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Roberts</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are we fighting over this issue? The people posting in this thread all command respect from the downtown community.

However I will say that I do NOT think that the &quot;crying wolf&quot; on the convention center location is baseless. I think it&#039;s patently obvious that there is a very clear effort from City Hall to make absolutely certain the convention is next to the park, for whatever reason..at times against the advice from within the planning department.

Look at the people planning C2S--its biggest fans. Most of them are marketing people, not city planners or architects--for the most part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we fighting over this issue? The people posting in this thread all command respect from the downtown community.</p>
<p>However I will say that I do NOT think that the &#8220;crying wolf&#8221; on the convention center location is baseless. I think it&#8217;s patently obvious that there is a very clear effort from City Hall to make absolutely certain the convention is next to the park, for whatever reason..at times against the advice from within the planning department.</p>
<p>Look at the people planning C2S&#8211;its biggest fans. Most of them are marketing people, not city planners or architects&#8211;for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Loudenback</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7217</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Loudenback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has all been saved -- 7 pages long before reformatting to make it look pretty. Without your permission, I will now post your last comment, above, at OkcTalk.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has all been saved &#8212; 7 pages long before reformatting to make it look pretty. Without your permission, I will now post your last comment, above, at OkcTalk.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Loudenback</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7216</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Loudenback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have saved your last comment, Steve, noting your comment that
&lt;blockquote&gt;This is my final writing on this topic.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Anyone with a quarter of a brain can draw fair and accurate presumptive inferences as to why you said what you just did.

Before I go off the deep end and get into political stuff yet again (which I really DO NOT enjoy doing), I am:

(1) Saving every comment made in this thread;

(2) Waiting for a few days to see if you begin writing on this topic again. If you do not, I will presume the worst.
If it gets deleted, I will be inclined to post it elsewhere. Hopefully, no need will exist for that to occur.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have saved your last comment, Steve, noting your comment that</p>
<blockquote><p>This is my final writing on this topic.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone with a quarter of a brain can draw fair and accurate presumptive inferences as to why you said what you just did.</p>
<p>Before I go off the deep end and get into political stuff yet again (which I really DO NOT enjoy doing), I am:</p>
<p>(1) Saving every comment made in this thread;</p>
<p>(2) Waiting for a few days to see if you begin writing on this topic again. If you do not, I will presume the worst.<br />
If it gets deleted, I will be inclined to post it elsewhere. Hopefully, no need will exist for that to occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slackmeyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/03/11/now-back-to-that-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-7214</link>
		<dc:creator>slackmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3295#comment-7214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the rest of what I know:
- This HOK study was not provided to the Core to Shore task force, even though it was being done while the group was still meeting.
- Members of the Core to Shore task force I&#039;ve spoken to say it should have been provided to them.
- The mayor can&#039;t explain why it wasn&#039;t provided to them.
- The mayor says in the video above the Core to Shore site was selected as the best in the Core to Shore planning process (the task force). The Core to Shore task force never voted on a site. The renderings and maps show the convention center site at the mayor&#039;s direction.
- The city has already bought property in the area identified as the Core to Shore convention center site.
- The mayor intends to use $30 million of the MAPS 3 money on buying OG&amp;E property on the Core to Shore convention center site regardless of any other decision.
This is my final writing on this topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the rest of what I know:<br />
- This HOK study was not provided to the Core to Shore task force, even though it was being done while the group was still meeting.<br />
- Members of the Core to Shore task force I&#8217;ve spoken to say it should have been provided to them.<br />
- The mayor can&#8217;t explain why it wasn&#8217;t provided to them.<br />
- The mayor says in the video above the Core to Shore site was selected as the best in the Core to Shore planning process (the task force). The Core to Shore task force never voted on a site. The renderings and maps show the convention center site at the mayor&#8217;s direction.<br />
- The city has already bought property in the area identified as the Core to Shore convention center site.<br />
- The mayor intends to use $30 million of the MAPS 3 money on buying OG&amp;E property on the Core to Shore convention center site regardless of any other decision.<br />
This is my final writing on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
