<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/01/28/fast-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/01/28/fast-company/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:23:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2010/01/28/fast-company/comment-page-1/#comment-6226</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=3119#comment-6226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following quote is taken directly from the article you linked to, Steve.

&quot;&#039;Downtown has nice open spaces, but they&#039;re not particularly organized.&#039; By contrast, the new park will have restaurants open onto the plaza, on-site daycare for Sandridge employees, and enough furniture, shade, and privacy to stimulate traffic. Downtown needs it; the vacancy rate is still 27%.&quot;

Does anyone else think this alleged park could take away traffic and attention from the upcoming MAPS III &quot;Central Park&quot;? I fear another new planned downtown park will steal glory from the other. Why congregate at one park when there&#039;s a second, more intimate version, just blocks away?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following quote is taken directly from the article you linked to, Steve.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Downtown has nice open spaces, but they&#8217;re not particularly organized.&#8217; By contrast, the new park will have restaurants open onto the plaza, on-site daycare for Sandridge employees, and enough furniture, shade, and privacy to stimulate traffic. Downtown needs it; the vacancy rate is still 27%.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does anyone else think this alleged park could take away traffic and attention from the upcoming MAPS III &#8220;Central Park&#8221;? I fear another new planned downtown park will steal glory from the other. Why congregate at one park when there&#8217;s a second, more intimate version, just blocks away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
