<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxpayers Spend Millions on River Boats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Jet</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-4979</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie Jet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=2624#comment-4979</guid>
		<description>Yep, time to rethink this arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, time to rethink this arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=2624#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>It was a HUGE mistake to ever put the riverboats under MetroTransit and try to characterize them as public transportation. This should have been water taxi&#039;s thing  all along with the same type of deal given them as before. As a business, Water taxi has an incentive for the service to be profitable, whereas as a public entity, MetroTransit could care less if the River Cruises ever make money. Their pathetic p.r. with the river boats demonstrates this. There is ZERO cooperation or tie-in between Water Taxi and River Cruises, which also hurts.  

My understanding was that Water Taxi was going to be the operator of this until some last minute politicing shut them out. Now we have boats but no real plan as to how they will generate revenue. It looks like the plan was to just keep tapping gov. money under the guise of public transportation. 

My prediction is within 5 years the whole river transit operation will be sold to Water Taxi anyway. Those boats will look nice in Green and Yellow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a HUGE mistake to ever put the riverboats under MetroTransit and try to characterize them as public transportation. This should have been water taxi&#8217;s thing  all along with the same type of deal given them as before. As a business, Water taxi has an incentive for the service to be profitable, whereas as a public entity, MetroTransit could care less if the River Cruises ever make money. Their pathetic p.r. with the river boats demonstrates this. There is ZERO cooperation or tie-in between Water Taxi and River Cruises, which also hurts.  </p>
<p>My understanding was that Water Taxi was going to be the operator of this until some last minute politicing shut them out. Now we have boats but no real plan as to how they will generate revenue. It looks like the plan was to just keep tapping gov. money under the guise of public transportation. </p>
<p>My prediction is within 5 years the whole river transit operation will be sold to Water Taxi anyway. Those boats will look nice in Green and Yellow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=2624#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>The above wasn&#039;t a slam at the Canal. Can only imagine the river boats haven&#039;t received the same exposure/press that the Canal did</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above wasn&#8217;t a slam at the Canal. Can only imagine the river boats haven&#8217;t received the same exposure/press that the Canal did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=2624#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>Same was true for the Canal when it opened, it was a boat ride to nowhere...once you turned at the ballpark it was desolate... dead/dying landscaping, mounds of Oklahoma red dirt etc etc. Yet my fellow Okies were dressed in their Sunday finest (wool suits on a blistering July 4th weekend) lined up to get to take a ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same was true for the Canal when it opened, it was a boat ride to nowhere&#8230;once you turned at the ballpark it was desolate&#8230; dead/dying landscaping, mounds of Oklahoma red dirt etc etc. Yet my fellow Okies were dressed in their Sunday finest (wool suits on a blistering July 4th weekend) lined up to get to take a ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=2624#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really understand this at all.  Who even thought we needed river boats?  Is this federal money we wouldn&#039;t be getting if it weren&#039;t for the boats?  

It may be, as Core to Shore develops, that there will actually be something to take a boat to, but currently, I can ride my bike up and down the river in far less time and see the same scenery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really understand this at all.  Who even thought we needed river boats?  Is this federal money we wouldn&#8217;t be getting if it weren&#8217;t for the boats?  </p>
<p>It may be, as Core to Shore develops, that there will actually be something to take a boat to, but currently, I can ride my bike up and down the river in far less time and see the same scenery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTDT</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/11/01/taxpayers-spend-millions-on-river-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-4960</link>
		<dc:creator>BTDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/?p=2624#comment-4960</guid>
		<description>Does.not.compute.
Not logically anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does.not.compute.<br />
Not logically anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

