In other words: Because that’s the way it was in the past, we should maintain it in the future. That seems to be the only logic guiding their counter-progressive actions. BUT, the neighborhood is not an historic district. It was DENIED historic status because it did not have the qualifying attributes. Look around… it’s never going to be an historic neighborhood!

That leads me to believe that the motivation is irrational. I’d love to learn otherwise, because then we’d be able to address the issue with logic and reason instead of just wasting everyone’s time and money.

Let’s hope that the Board of Adjustment is wearing their logic-hat this afternoon!

I still would like to see Randy Floyd state her true motives for the opposition. I can respect a difference of opinion, but so far, haven’t heard on why she is opposing it other than “setback requirements”.