<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Idea for the New I-40 Crosstown Expressway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Why on a bridge?  Excuse me, but that&#039;s a square peg in a round hole if there ever was one.  Expensive, maintenance intensive, and plain illogical.  (Not to mention it&#039;d sling grease onto the roadway &amp; cars below.)  Greewashing run amuck.

Please say this is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on a bridge?  Excuse me, but that&#8217;s a square peg in a round hole if there ever was one.  Expensive, maintenance intensive, and plain illogical.  (Not to mention it&#8217;d sling grease onto the roadway &amp; cars below.)  Greewashing run amuck.</p>
<p>Please say this is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/comment-page-1/#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>Cool looking for sure...though I bet it would be pretty intense walking through the middle with those things spinning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool looking for sure&#8230;though I bet it would be pretty intense walking through the middle with those things spinning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>That would pretty much be awesome.

I&#039;m in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would pretty much be awesome.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/comment-page-1/#comment-1840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2009/02/05/idea-for-the-new-i-40-crosstown-expressway/#comment-1840</guid>
		<description>I think that is just GREAT... and would be tremendous for image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is just GREAT&#8230; and would be tremendous for image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

