Comments on: "Devon is freaking huge"

By: Jason

Jason — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:44:02 +0000

Upon examining the most recent issues, it appears they have gotten better on having OKC-related articles (although there is still a bias), however the advertising is still all Tulsa.

I know that about a year ago, when I was still working at an OKC ad agency, our media buyers scoffed at the idea of advertising with Oklahoma Magazine almost as much as they did with KSBI.

By: slackmeyer

slackmeyer — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:25:54 +0000

Steven, don’t confuse Oklahoma Today with Oklahoma magazine. They are very, very, very different.

By: Steven

Steven — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:51:23 +0000

Jake/Jason,

I agree “Oklahoma” Magazine should be called “Tulsa Magazine”, however they recently did a really cool OKC issue (did you catch it?), also in December (proposed issue) they are doing a feature article about some of us that live downtown OKC and the downtown OKC lifestyle. (check it out, I’ll be in it).

By: dustbury.com » Sort of a Herb Caen’t

dustbury.com » Sort of a Herb Caen’t — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:32:30 +0000

[...] mean, seriously here: In another era not too long ago, Charles Hill would have been one of those celebrated [...]

By: JakeZula

JakeZula — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:24:06 +0000

OK Mag is a joke. I’m glad someone else realizes this.

By: Jason

Jason — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:19:02 +0000

Oklahoma Magazine is a joke.

It’s all Tulsa articles and advertisers, and then they have the gall to act as if it represents the whole state.

By: Jan

Jan — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:59:56 +0000

Yeah…I noticed Dustbury wasn’t on the list, too…..so I threw the mag in the trash.

And I’ve never had trouble parking, either.

By: CGHill

CGHill — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 04:03:51 +0000

Um, thanks. Is this where I mention that I’ve never once had a lick of trouble finding parking in Bricktown?