<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higher and Higher and Higher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/08/17/higher-and-higher-and-higher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/08/17/higher-and-higher-and-higher/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/08/17/higher-and-higher-and-higher/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/08/17/higher-and-higher-and-higher/#comment-626</guid>
		<description>I agree with Reggie.  I really don&#039;t care if it is taller than Tulsa&#039;s tallest or not.  I&#039;d rather see an attractive building with good urban design (ground floor retail, smaller setback, etc.) than the tallest in the city or state.  Although I do believe that tall buildings look impressive, they usually just look like status symbols that too often trade size for design, and often don&#039;t fit with their surroundings too well.  Take the current tallest in OKC (can&#039;t remember the name right now); it&#039;s pretty bland looking, and it&#039;s large setback and lack of retail ensures that there will be no activity after hours.

One thing I&#039;m curious about Steve; in the last bond package, there was a plan to extend Harvey Ave. south to Sheridan.  Is this still in the city&#039;s plans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Reggie.  I really don&#8217;t care if it is taller than Tulsa&#8217;s tallest or not.  I&#8217;d rather see an attractive building with good urban design (ground floor retail, smaller setback, etc.) than the tallest in the city or state.  Although I do believe that tall buildings look impressive, they usually just look like status symbols that too often trade size for design, and often don&#8217;t fit with their surroundings too well.  Take the current tallest in OKC (can&#8217;t remember the name right now); it&#8217;s pretty bland looking, and it&#8217;s large setback and lack of retail ensures that there will be no activity after hours.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;m curious about Steve; in the last bond package, there was a plan to extend Harvey Ave. south to Sheridan.  Is this still in the city&#8217;s plans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Jet</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/08/17/higher-and-higher-and-higher/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie Jet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/08/17/higher-and-higher-and-higher/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person that doesn&#039;t want it to be *too* tall? Based on some of the comments in other forums, some folks want Devon to shoot for the sky. I don&#039;t want a monolith that will dwarf our current skyline. Can&#039;t wait to see what happens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person that doesn&#8217;t want it to be *too* tall? Based on some of the comments in other forums, some folks want Devon to shoot for the sky. I don&#8217;t want a monolith that will dwarf our current skyline. Can&#8217;t wait to see what happens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

