<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Once Upon A Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/04/23/once-upon-a-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/04/23/once-upon-a-time/</link>
	<description>The Oklahoman&#039;s Steve Lackmeyer covers downtown OKC brick by brick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/04/23/once-upon-a-time/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/04/23/once-upon-a-time/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>The argument, of course, is that Lower Bricktown shouldn&#039;t have had expectations to &quot;fit in&quot; with Bricktown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument, of course, is that Lower Bricktown shouldn&#8217;t have had expectations to &#8220;fit in&#8221; with Bricktown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/04/23/once-upon-a-time/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/04/23/once-upon-a-time/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I notice in the original drawings, that there was actually aesthetically interesting architecture planned originially for Lower Bricktown.   Instead, Hogan went cheap, and we have boring looking one story buildings.    The Centennial Building is quite an eyesore, and doesn&#039;t even fit in with the &quot;Brick&quot;town district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice in the original drawings, that there was actually aesthetically interesting architecture planned originially for Lower Bricktown.   Instead, Hogan went cheap, and we have boring looking one story buildings.    The Centennial Building is quite an eyesore, and doesn&#8217;t even fit in with the &#8220;Brick&#8221;town district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

