wildlife


By John Sutter

The federal government settled a lawsuit this week over protection status for the black-tailed prairie dog.

Environmental groups had sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, asking the agency to act more quickly. An initial statement on the issue must come by November, and then the agency will have a year to decide whether or not to recommend the black-tailed prairie dog for protection under the Endangered Species Act.

According to WildEarth Guardians, one of the groups that filed the suit, black-tailed prairie dog populations are 1 or 2 percent of what they used to be.

The black-tailed prairie dogs previously were considered for such endangered species protection. WildEarth contends it was removed from consideration because of political pressure.

Sharon Rose, spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said the agency will review the information submitted by environmental groups by November. At that time, the government could rule that not enough information has been provided to warrant formal protection; or it could decide to look into matters further, she said.

I wrote about this issue when the lawsuit was filed back in Feb. 2007. At the time, many farmers considered the black-tailed prairie dog a major pest since they dig holes that livestock will trip in. They also chew up the land so there’s not much left for cattle to graze, a rancher told me.

Environmental groups contend that prairie dogs are a vital part of western ecosystems. They say their habitats are being destroyed, and that the animals are shot for pleasure.

There’s always more than two sides to every story. What do you think about prairie dogs? Cute critters? Essential to ecosystems? Annoying rats? Model city planners? Feel free to comment.

(photo by John Sutter: Makira National Park in northeast Madagascar is home to incredible biodiversity. You can see some of the forest near the park burning in the top right part of the image.)
By John Sutter

An Oklahoma State researcher has gotten lots of media attention for untangling the secrets of a tiny chameleon in Madagascar. Furcifer labordi lives a high-speed life that’s much more like the life of a plant or an insect than a reptile: it dies in a year, and spends much of that time trapped inside an egg.

It’s an all or nothing existence. The chameleon has one chance to mate. One chance to reproduce. It only has one season to survive. It operates like an annual plant, spreading its seed before dying off. That may be a survival technique, since the chameleons live in a harsh desert environment that would be tough to live through anyway.

Kris Karsten, the recent PhD graduate at OSU who did the research, told me the discovery shocked and excited him in part because it’s proof that humans know so very little about this planet of ours. People have known F. labordi existed for more than 100 years, Karsten said, but no one knew about its bizarre life style until just recently.

It’s that sentiment–the idea that so much of the world is unexplored, and everything we do know seems worthy of our reverence for its incredible complexity–that pushed me to move to Madagascar last summer.

The huge Indian Ocean island, just off the coast of Africa, is known for its incredible biological resources. Most species of chameleons in the world live only in Madagascar and nowhere else, to site just one example. The whole island, which has been on its own evolutionary track for millions of years, seems a Dr. Seussian adventure. There are beetles with periscoping necks, geckos that look exactly like tree leaves and palms that poke their fronds up in a perfect line. It’s wonderful and amazing. And, in some ways, tragic.

Much of Madagascar’s natural resources have been exploited, and conservationists say more than 80 percent of the island is now deforested. When you fly over the central highlands, you see why people call it the Red Island: the iron-rich red dirt is visible everywhere. But there aren’t simple causes or solutions. Madagascar is one of the poorest countries on earth, and locals burn down the forest to plant rice paddies so they can feed their families. Or they plant a few cash crops, and sell them at market to get money for food. Environmental groups say the burning practices are unsustainable and are ruining the soil, but some locals say the burning is part of their culture. Foreign groups are trying to teach more sustainable farming practices. They seem to be catching on well in some areas, and are largely ignored in other places.
One thing seems clear about the burning practices: when an acre of land is lost in Madagascar, species could go extinct. I spent a couple of weeks in the northeast part of the island near a national park called Masoala. There, biologists say you can find species of orchids and palms that exist in one valley on one side of one mountain. Nowhere else. If those patches of forest go, so do the species.

As you’ll hear in the podcast, there’s reason to be optimistic that Malagasy people can come to benefit from their rich natural resources. As mentioned, there is a government effort to expand protected land. But environmental groups are also trying to get carbon credits for local people who will protect virgin forest or replant land that has been burned.

All that aside, I found Karsten’s perspective interesting and refreshing. He showed a true appreciation for how complex nature is. When we take a minute out of our days to look at how amazing the details of natural systems are — that we’re still discovering new life cycles in species we know about, and are finding species we’ve never heard of all the time — then it’s hard not to be kind of impressed.

(PS: You don’t have to go to Madagascar to get that feeling. Did you know Oklahoma has more ecoregions than almost any other state in the country?)

polar-bear-underwater-01.jpgThis article from CNN reports that the Endangered Species Act is about to add another animal to its growing list of endangered animals.

The loss of arctic ice is causing polar bears - some of the strongest swimmers in the animal kingdom - to drown on the search for somewhere to rest.

This short video comes from the NRDC and explains the peril that polar bears are in.

- Linds

watermarkphp.jpgThe late, great Steve Irwin’s daughter launched her “green” clothing line yesterday. Bindi Wear International has a snazzy, fun Web site which is colorful and interactive and the clothes are actually quite cute.

I should disclose that I can’t tell a lie and that Bindi Irwin creeps me out something terrible. She’s a little too in-your-face ‘look at me!’  for my liking and is way too grown-up for a tiny person.

I will, however, say that her clothing line has a great message behind it.  It donates money to animal conservation and educates children about the environment. And, truly, the clothes are pretty cool for kids - if I had children, I’d buy them.

I don’t know how much Bindi actually got a say in her clothing line and the designs (probably more than I’d imagine), but having a child promoting animal conservation is great. Children are going to respond to another child in a different way than they would an adult telling them what to wear and do.

I think she’s going to be in the public eye for a very long time so I’d better get used to her peppy ways. She gets to grow up on a zoo which must be amazing, but she doesn’t have her dad anymore, and, for that, I will always hold a soft spot in my heart for this strange, little creature called Bindi.

And, frankly, Steve Irwin could do no wrong in my opinion, so any child of his must be OK, mate.

- Linds

globe1.jpg

Dark blue areas in this figure of the global distribution of chlorophyll are the areas with the least surface chlorophyll. Care of NASA.

Maybe that’s a bit dramatic - but the oceans’ deserts are expanding faster than usual according to this article.

What does this mean for marine life? Well, it may dramatically reduce the habitats and, therefore, the population of fish that can’t withstand the “desert” environment.

““The fact that we are seeing an expansion of the ocean’s least productive areas as the subtropical gyres warm is consistent with our understanding of the impact of global warming. But with a nine-year time series, it is difficult to rule out decadal variation,” said Jeffrey J. Polovina, an oceanographer with NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service in Honolulu.”

The map above shows low areas of chlorophyll which indicates where there are low areas of phytoplankton - the bottom of the food chain for marine life. So, where’s there’s low phytoplankton, there’s low populations of marine life.

Certainly a concerning trend.

- Linds