By John Sutter
The Los Angeles Times has a story this morning on the 1,000 acre switchgrass field in the Oklahoma Panhandle. A reporter talked with the gentleman who’s growing the biofuels crop, which is native to this state and the Great Plains, and can be grown on marginal land:
Curtis Raines describes himself as “just a dumb old farmer” who’s not afraid to ask an obvious question: Why grow corn for fuel when it could be used to feed hungry people?
“That just doesn’t make a lot of sense to me,” Raines said.
State leaders are banking on that kind of common sense, and have invested in grass-based biofuels research. As I reported in The Oklahoman, the issue rests on the ability of industry to transform the grasses into fuel. That hasn’t been done on commercial scales, and is the focus of much of the state-funded research:
About one-fifth of the corn crop in the United States is converted into ethanol, a fuel that can be mixed with gasoline and then used in standard automobile engines.
Ethanol once was seen as a silver bullet in the nation’s battle for energy independence, and, to some extent, the battle against global warming.
But corn ethanol started drawing heated criticism late last year as food prices jumped around the world, putting basic nutrition out of the hands of many of the world’s poor. Jean Ziegler, the U.N.’s independent expert on the right to food, called food-to-fuel schemes a “crime against humanity.”
Officials say Oklahoma is free from any of that blame because it is not much of a corn-producing state. The 2008 corn crop here is expected to cover 330,000 acres, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That’s about 5 percent of the state’s total crop acreage.
Researchers and officials say switchgrass, which is native to the state and the Great Plains, will do better here. It will grow on marginal land not suitable for food crops. If managed properly, it wouldn’t contribute to food shortages.
Nathanael Greene, a senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council, warned against taking the concept too far.
“It’s important that we not latch onto a crop like switchgrass as a panacea, because we could start harvesting corn fields and planting them with switchgrass and cause the same amount of complications — and reduce the amount of food available — as we do now,” Greene said.
“I don’t think any technology is inherently evil, or inherently the solution,” he added.

