Jim Inhofe


By John Sutter

On Monday, President Bush lifted an executive ban on offshore drilling for oil. Bush said the act puts pressure on Congress to reciprocate by voting to end its moratorium on offshore drilling, which has been in place since 1981.

Both the congressional and executive bans would have to be lifted in order for the drilling to occur.

Bush said the move would help Americans who are hurting because of high gas prices at the pump. Environmentalists quickly pointed out that offshore drilling will have no impact on gas prices in the short term, and could cause devastating consequences for the environment.

Jim Presswood, an energy advocate at the Natural Resources Defense Council, issued this statement:

“In 2006, President Bush declared that the United States is addicted to oil. Today, he suggested we get a bigger needle.

“The disastrous pro-big oil policies of President Bush and his allies in Congress have left us more addicted to oil than ever. Americans deserve policies that free us from fossil fuels and give us better choices that will bring down our energy costs, make our air cleaner, and help solve global warming.

For more background on the issue read stories from the San Fran Chronicle, The Oklahoman, Tulsa World and Washington Post.

I’ve pulled quotes from Oklahoma-relevant officials below:

U.S. Rep. Mary Fallin, an Oklahoma City Republican:

“It is obvious that one immediate solution to rising energy prices is to find and develop more domestic oil and gas reserves. Modern technologies have made offshore drilling safer and cleaner than ever before.”

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, a Tulsa Republican:

“Currently, 85 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf — an estimated 19 billion barrels of recoverable oil — is off limits. At today’s import levels, this is the equivalent of 35 years of imports from Saudi Arabia.”

Larry Nichols, chief executive of Devon Energy Corp.:

“For a long time, our political leaders could do what environmentalists wanted and still deliver cheap energy. But those days are over. They are over forever. And when they are asked about how they justify these bans and other restrictions on the development of all forms of energy, those are going to be difficult questions for some people to answer.”

Barack Obama, presumptive Dem. nominee for president

“This is not something that’s going to give consumers short-term relief and it is not a long-term solution to our problems with fossil fuels generally and oil in particular.”

John McCain, presumptive Rep. nominee for president

On Monday, McCain made lifting the federal ban on offshore oil and gas development a key part of his energy plan. McCain said states should be allowed to pursue energy exploration in waters near their coasts and get some of the royalty revenue. (AP reporting)

The town of Picher sits beneath 100-foot mountains of toxic mine waste, left over from a time when the area of far northeast Oklahoma was one of the biggest lead and zinc mining sites in the world. In May, a tornado leveled half of the town.

It took a town to find help for Tar Creek

By John David Sutter
Staff Writer

PICHER — Over the years, many have championed the cause of this polluted lead and zinc mining town from behind the scenes.

The former northeastern Oklahoma mining district, called Tar Creek, has been on the government’s list of high-priority environmental cleanup sites since 1983. In recent years, residents have slowly left the area, as a government-funded program pays willing people for their property.

Behind the politics of that plan and many others, local advocacy has been present. A local nurse was the first to suggest mine waste near the town of Picher might be poisoning kids. A nuclear scientist returned to his hometown and pushed for a look at massive cave-ins caused by extensive subterranean mine workings. And a guidance counselor has been drawing attention to poisoned waters at the site for more than a decade.

Meanwhile, in a campaign ad, Republican U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe claims to be responsible for the environmental cleanup and buyout program.

In the commercial, titled “One Man in America,” a narrator says: “Tar Creek: poisoned earth, the threat of schools and churches sinking into abandoned mines. Everyone thought it would be too much to tackle, except for one stubborn man named Inhofe.”

Some residents say a buyout, which is unfinished, wouldn’t have happened without Inhofe.

But before any politicians got involved, common people have fought to put Tar Creek on the government’s radar for more than three decades.

George Mayer: The rancher

 

The prairie was oozing orange, and George Mayer is said to be the first to have taken notice. On his ranch in Commerce, just down the road from the former Tri-State Mining District, rust-colored water started seeping out of the ground in 1979 or 1980.

It stained the legs and backs of Mayer’s white Arabian horses that roamed the field. It burned the hair off their legs, left open sores, and sizzled right through a metal bucket, according to a newspaper report.

As hard as her husband tried, he couldn’t get the stains off, said Maxine Mayer, George’s widow. George Mayer’s son, Jody Mayer, said it looked like the horses were wearing red socks.

According to a 1983 story by the Times-Post News Service, the U.S. Geological survey published a report in 1978 that predicted the coming problems associated with 10.75 billion gallons of acid mine water that had filled the mines.

After the mines closed in 1970, pumps that kept the cavernous mines from flooding with groundwater were turned off. Soon the caves filled with water, that water picked up heavy metals, turned acidic and crept up to the surface, where it oxidized.

George embarked on a research and public relations campaign to warn people about the pollution he’d found, said Jody Mayer, 62. His father, who died in 1998, called the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Jody Mayer said, and soon government officials and news reporters were swarming the area.

“It threw up the red flag,” Jody Mayer said.

By 1981, the state government developed a plan to address water pollution at Tar Creek, and in 1983 the federal government listed Tar Creek as one of the must urgent hazardous waste sites in its Superfund program.

Dr. Shirley Chesnut: The physician

 

The child patients were funneling in at an alarming rate, all with the same symptoms: trouble paying attention, trouble reading and trouble learning. It perplexed Dr. Shirley Chesnut, who was working at the Miami Indian Health Clinic in the early 1990s. All the kids were coming from nearby Picher, and she thought teachers might be over-diagnosing attention deficit disorder.

Then a nurse made a connection: “Well, it could be lead,” Carol Barnett told Dr. Chesnut.

About 10 years after Tar Creek was declared a Superfund site, no one had tested local kids to see if the toxic metals had ended up in their blood, damaging their central nervous systems.

After Barnett raised the issue, Chesnut said she started an informal program to blood test kids for lead.

The results were alarming.

“I’ll never forget it, because probably every child we checked came back with a high lead level,” she said.

Chesnut tested her own children, and three of the four had high lead levels, she said.

Chesnut didn’t have time to do an overall study of the situation, said Rebecca Jim, who interviewed health workers about the situation for a book. A graduate student stepped in to analyze the results, she said.

In 1994, the clinic reported that 35 percent of the American Indian kids tested had high blood lead levels.

The government began testing for lead in the blood of residents and in the soil.

The results came in 1996 and offered similar results — 31.2 percent of kids in the area had blood lead levels higher than 10 micrograms per deciliter, the government’s safety limit.

Years later, in 2004, the information about these public health risks, pushed Gov. Brad Henry to propose a plan to pay all families with children 6 years old and younger to leave the Superfund site.

Henry’s spokesman, Paul Sund, said that plan would never have happened without blood testing; and, he said, the Inhofe buyout wouldn’t be happening if the 2004 effort hadn’t served as a template.

Rebecca Jim: The counselor

 

For 14 years, Rebecca Jim has held fake fishing tournaments near, but not in, Tar Creek. No one ever catches anything, and that’s the point: the water is too toxic for aquatic life to survive. “There aren’t any fish yet, so we’re still just practicing,” said Jim, who is a former guidance counselor from Miami, OK.

Jim founded the Local Environmental Action Demanded (L.E.A.D.) Agency in part to draw attention to how large of an area is being damaged by the mine waste and how many people are being hurt.

In addition to the fishing tournaments, she also hosts a conference to raise local awareness about Tar Creek.

With input from Jim and Earl Hatley, the state posted an advisory that warns locals about the dangers of eating too much fish caught in Tar Creek, the Neosho River, Spring River and Grand Lake, said Jay Wright, who worked on the project with the state Department of Environmental Quality.

Wright said Jim helped the agency realize that some American Indians in the area pressure cook fish, eating the bones and skin, which are potentially the most toxic parts of fish that they live around heavy metals. A previous study hadn’t taken local eating habits into account, he said.

“They’ve done a lot to raise public awareness on a lot of fronts, and frankly to encourage public agencies to take a look at the situation a little closer — and maybe look at it in ways that we hadn’t thought about looking at it before,” Wright said of Jim and Hatley.

Jim still is advocating for continued environmental cleanup, and will host a 10th Tar Creek conference September 15 to 17.

“Once people are out of the epicenter (of Tar Creek), it doesn’t mean the problem is gone,” she said. “The problem is still huge. It’s just huge beyond belief.”

She’s hopeful that fish will be able to live in Tar Creek again soon, with continued federal attention. Then, her fishing tournaments can be real — instead of held in protest.

Jim Inhofe: the senator

 

Cave-ins have long been reported in the unstable mining area at Tar Creek. In the 1960s, houses actually sunk into the mine working. Picher’s Main Street was shut down in the ’50s because the fear of cave-ins was so great. And, prior to 1986, there were 59 collapses that sank craters more than 95 feet across, according to a government report.

Despite all these warning signs, the cave-in risks were never studied on a large scale until 2006, when a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers report was released.

The results surpassed anything Inhofe expected. Two-hundred eighty-six homes, businesses and churches were found to be at risk for collapse.

Inhofe said in an interview that he decided to put increased attention on Tar Creek in 2003, when he became chair of the senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee.

In 2004, he used that sway to pass a bill through congress that authorized $45 million for cleanup on the fringes of the Tar Creek site.

Some residents criticized that plan.

“I can find no indication, through his actions or his words, that the problems of these children matter,” Mark Osborn, a physician from Miami, told the Associated Press in 2003.

Inhofe was adamantly opposed to a public buyout, and in a December 2003 interview with the Tulsa World, he said: “There will never be a buyout. I promise you that.”

The powerful senator changed his tune recently, and he attributes the change to the $2 million 2006 report — which he commissioned and funded. It quantified and specified the risks for cave-ins.

While others called for a buyout on the merits of health and environmental risks in the area, Inhofe never supported one until safety and cave-ins became the issue.

The senator helped redirect cleanup money to pay residents to start leaving the area. Locals praise him for those efforts, saying Inhofe stepped in to aid them when other politicians wouldn’t or couldn’t.

When asked if he single-handedly is responsible for the current buyout program and environmental cleanup at Tar Creek, as he claims in his campaign ad, Inhofe said:

“Would we be where we are today, with almost to solution of a problem that’s been there for 30 years, without my being involved?” he said. “That’s the question you need to ask.”

Ed Keheley: the scientist

 

Keheley is a Picher native who returned to town after a career as a top nuclear weapons engineer at a U.S. Department of Energy lab. Tired of the stress that led him to pop antacids on his morning and afternoon commutes in California, Keheley moved back home in 1997 for a simpler life. He was shocked to find his hometown was part of the EPA’s hazardous waste program.

He had to get involved, he said. So Keheley set out to conduct his own investigation.

He sifted through news articles about the earth swallowing up homes. He dug through mining maps, which showed 100-foot caves underground, some only 100 feet from the surface. And he found out that support pillars that held those cave ceilings in place often were blasted out before the mines closed, so the mining companies could extract remaining ore.

At first, Keheley said, Inhofe and other officials “turned a deaf ear” to local efforts to draw attention to the unstable area.

“There is a class system alive and well in the United States, and if you are a small rural community that doesn’t have a voting bloc, you do not have the same access to federal resources and federal officials,” he said, adding: “When we were trying to focus attention on Tar Creek, he (Inhofe) was pretty much ignoring us.” Keheley said Inhofe’s aides ignored — and sometimes rudely dismissed — concerns about the environmental health of Tar Creek.

The senator’s office wouldn’t discuss the safety of the area or the possibility of getting residents of harm’s way, Keheley said.

In April 2004, Keheley said he got to have a discussion with the senator.

They sat at opposing ends of a conference table, Keheley said.

Keheley said he persuaded Inhofe to go on a private tour of Tar Creek with him. The experience helped convince Inhofe there was a serious risk for cave-ins, he said. After the meeting, Keheley told the media: “We expected to be read the Riot Act, but he really surprised us.”

“Never in my wildest dreams would I have said he’s the guy that’s going to step forward and solve this,” Keheley said of Inhofe, “but that’s one of the oddities of life. I’m certainly thankful for what he’s done.”

Keheley said he thinks the buyout would not have happened without Inhofe’s support.

He called the senator’s campaign commercial a “flamboyant” attempt to take full credit for positive strides at Tar Creek, and said other politicians with access to the same resources as Inhofe would have made similar decisions.

TAR CREEK TIMELINE

1904: Underground lead and zinc mining starts in Picher, in the northeast corner of Oklahoma. 1920s: The mining peaks.

1950s: The mines decline, and Picher closes its Main Street because of a cave-in.

1960s: Homes sink into abandoned mine workings.

1970: Mining stops.

1978: The U.S. Geological Survey warns of future problems associated with nearly 10.75 billion gallons of acid water that in the underground mines.

1983: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency declares Tar Creek a high-priority waste site in the Superfund program.

1994: A local nurse-doctor team first suspected a connection between lead mine waste and learning deficiencies at Picher-Cardin Schools.

1995: People living near Tar Creek begin holding annual fake fishing competitions to tell the government they believe fish and waters in the area are unhealthy.

1996: Government tests show 31.2 percent of kids in the area have blood lead levels higher than 10 micrograms per deciliter, the government limit.

1998: A local environmental advocacy group begins holding public conferences about Tar Creek.

2003: U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe spars with U.S. Rep. Brad Carson over a buyout at Tar Creek. Carson favors a buyout. In December, Inhofe tells the Tulsa World: “There will never be a buyout. I promise you that.”

2004: Inhofe, R-Tulsa, funds an “omnibus bill” that includes $45 million for cleanup on the periphery of the Tar Creek site.

2004: Gov. Brad Henry, a Democrat, calls for the government to pay willing families with kids ages 6 and younger to relocate from the Superfund site.

2004: Inhofe meets with residents. Some locals say Inhofe ignored their concerns before that April 2004 meeting.

2005: Inhofe uses sway as chair of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to fund a $2 million study of cave-in risks.

2006: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers releases a report saying 286 properties at the Tar Creek site are at risk for cave-ins. The $2 million report was commissioned by Inhofe.

2006: The corps report leads Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Tulsa, to call for a government-sponsored buyout.

2007: The state Department of Environmental Quality releases a warning that fish between Tar Creek and Grand Lake may be contaminated with toxic heavy metals.

2008: On May 10, an EF-4 tornado levels half of Picher, killing six. The buyout remains half finished. EPA officials estimate the cleanup process will take 30 more years.

Sources: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, The Oklahoman, The Associated Press, Tulsa World, the office of U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, Rebecca Jim, Ed Keheley.

By John Sutter

Here’s a bit of what I’m following this week, or found interesting in recent environment news:

Energy: The Economist’s cover story this week is about the need for innovation in the energy sector. As their charts show, changes in the energy sector have been slow, but major economic booms have occurred when new types of energy are discovered and used. Oil has been cheap, so there’s been little incentive for change until recently, the magazine writes. But those times are over. Wind and solar can compete with coal, and, in California, groups like google.org are searching for further alternatives. Oklahoma is situated to be a top-10 wind producer, but most of that potential hasn’t been realized.

Climate: James E. Hansen spoke on Capitol Hill yesterday, 20 years after the scientist testified before Congress that global warming is real and caused by humans. As The New York Times notes on its “Dot Earth” blog, Monday’s talk and Hansen’s previous comments have stirred discussion on this question: Are the leaders of big oil companies committing crimes by knowingly emitting pollutants known to alter the climate and cause extinctions? What do you think?

Sewers: The News-Leader, in Missouri, found that municipal sewers are leaking and fouling up rivers, despite fines from the government. Oklahoma sewer systems paid some of the biggest fines, according to the story:

- States where sewer systems paid the largest amounts in fines, both federal and state, were: California ($7.8 million), Tennessee ($3.4 million), New York ($3 million), Kentucky ($2.9 million), Maryland ($2 million), Florida ($1.5 million), Pennsylvania ($1.4 million), Indiana ($1.4 million), North Carolina ($1.2 million), and Oklahoma ($1.1 million).

Buses: As John A. Williams reports in The Oklahoman, some Edmond residents think riding the local bus sounds nice, but they won’t actually do it.

Climate: If you missed it last week, the U.S. government came out with its broadest report yet detailing the effects of climate change on extreme weather patterns. The report, issued by the Climate Change Science Program, says extreme weather “could seriously effect” agriculture, health and water, according to Reuters. Tying specific weather events to climate change is tricky, but in the long term, trends become more clear, according to scientists. In a center for severe weather like Oklahoma, I wonder what you all think of this report.

Drilling: George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain favor lifting a ban on offshore drilling to cut gas prices. Some have called that proposition disingenuous since the oil could take 10 years to actually hit the market. The Chicago Tribune looks at what offshore drilling could mean for Lake Michigan, and includes this bit from Oklahoma’s Jim Inhofe:

America’s outer continental shelf holds some 14 billion barrels of oil and 55 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, which according to Sen. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican and ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, is more than 25 years of Saudi Arabian imports. That’s in addition to the uncounted billions of barrels in North American oil shale, which, of course, is being extracted by Canada, but not by the United States.

Corn: NYT: Floods in the Midwest are leading the government to consider reducing ethanol mandates and planting conservation land with corn. That would off-set the crops that have drowned in floods. About a quarter of U.S. corn goes into ethanol, which has gained criticism from environmentalists.

Frogs: British scientists examine how Costa Rican tree frogs stave off a deadly fungus by sunbathing. Their skin absorbs and reflects the suns heat, so they don’t dry out. This video is cool, too.

Dish soap: Grist tests four green kitchen soaps. Most still contain potential carcinogens, the environment magazine writes, but read more to decide for yourself what’s safe, and what will tackle the grease on your pots and pans.

By John Sutter

Here are some notes on recent environment stories you may have missed, and what’s coming up this week:

China: There’s a new report to add certainty to the idea that China has surpassed the United States as the world’s top carbon dioxide emitter. Carbon dioxide is the most significant greenhouse gas. You’ll recall that the Senate recently debated a cap-and-trade system to contol carbon emissions. It failed. U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Tulsa, was an outspoken opponent of the bill.

Tar Creek: Tonight, tornado victims in Picher will get government offers for their property that was destroyed or damaged. Residents of the area, which is part of environmental disaster site, were already in the middle of a federal buyout process when the tornado hit. Find more background on the story here, and look for a story from tonight’s meeting in Tuesday’s paper.

Drought: The Oklahoma Panhandle remains in the middle of a drought that government monitors have labeled “extreme.” State officials say they’re planning a trip up to the Panhandle soon. Residents of the area say they’re selling off herds of cattle and facing non-existent wheat harvests. They say they’re often forgotten by “down staters” in Oklahoma City.

Floods: Meanwhile, the Midwest, and parts of eastern Oklahoma remain soaked in floodwaters. Find a real-time map of flood sites here.

Genius plants/bacteria: These are my two favorite stories from last week, both from NPR. First, this feature on plant research is about one plant can tell who its relatives are. The plants won’t compete with or kill family members, but will strangle others to ensure their survival. The other is about an ocean bacterium that’s responsible for the oxygen in every one in five of your breaths — yet, scientists didn’t know it existed until 20 years ago. Maybe that sounds boring, but listen. The writer makes it hilarious and fun. The bacterium, named Prochlorococcus, even has its own song.

Inhofe: U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe has been running a TV ad that talks about his role in getting help and money for residents of Tar Creek. The features a Picher resident who thanks the senator for his help. If you live in the area or have worked with the site, I wonder what your thoughts are. Feel free to comment.

This is a bit stale at this point, since the bill is dead, but I thought some of you might be interested in this New York Times report on the cap-and-trade / climate change debate in the senate.

The article is titled “More talking than listening in the Senate debate about climate change,” and it’s got lots of quotes and info from Sen. Jim Inhofe, the Republican from Tulsa. Inhofe is one of the most outspoken climate change skeptics.

Here’s the first bit:

WASHINGTON — About a day into the debate over legislation to combat global warming but before Republicans brought the discourse to a stop on Wednesday by insisting that the clerk read every word of the 492-page bill, Senator James M. Inhofe decided to get a few things off his chest.

 

 

Mr. Inhofe, who believes that fears of catastrophic climate change are hugely overblown, has insisted that there is no need to get into a scientific argument because there are enough other reasons to oppose the Senate bill, which would cap the production of heat-trapping gases and force polluters to buy permits to emit carbon dioxide.

Still, for a guy who said he did not want to talk about science, Mr. Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, was the only senator to utter the phrase “anthropogenic gases.” He also wanted to talk about the recent cold winter in his home state and mention a few small points of disagreement with Al Gore and Mr. Gore’s co-recipients of the Nobel Prize, the roughly 2,000 scientists who are part of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sponsored by the United Nations.

“We in the state of Oklahoma have had the worst cold spell during this last winter than we have in 30 years,” Mr. Inhofe said. “I find this to be true all over the country. You just can’t have it both ways.” (Most scientists say year-to-year weather changes are irrelevant to the clear, long-term warming trend.)

“One of the good things about this discussion and this debate is we are not going to be discussing the science,” Mr. Inhofe continued. Then, he unleashed an attack on the United Nations climate panel.

“We talked about 2,000 scientists,” he said. “We have a list of 30,000 scientists who said, ‘Yes, there can be a relationship between CO2 and a warming condition but it’s not major.’ ”

Next, he turned to Mr. Gore, the former vice president. “Al Gore has done his movie. Almost everything in his movie, in fact, everything has been refuted. Interestingly enough, the I.P.C.C. — on sea levels and other scare tactics used in that science fiction movie — it really has been totally refuted and refuted many times.”

Here’s the Wikipedia page on the senator, and his own site.

Inhofe is up for re-election this year. Here’s a newsok.com video about that:

John