environment


petrol.jpgWhat do you do when you have a gas guzzler, but it doesn’t make good financial sense to buy a new car?

I’m in that position. However, gas prices are making it more and more economical. And my commute is such that it might almost make more economical sense to get the new car.

I did the math yesterday and it appears that I can reduce my gas cost from $60 once a week to a total gas bill of $60 a month. And I suppose I can use that extra $180 a month to pay off a car quicker. And there’s that whole tax incentive thing.

Usually I jump right into doing something to help the environment, but adding a car payment to my monthly bills sort of makes my stomach turn.

What would you do?

Here is a good resource I found in my research.

- Lindsey

pittsburgh_2-400.jpgAccording to this article from CNN, LA is no longer the dirtiest, sootiest city in America.

The American Lung Association named Pittsburgh, PA, as the No. 1 sootiest city. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that the city has spent years trying to avoid the reputation of being the “Smoky City”:

“According to the association’s annual national report card on air pollution that’s being released today, the five-county Pittsburgh metropolitan area has the worst 24-hour soot levels and the second-worst annual soot level, behind Los Angeles.”

Some believe that it isn’t necessarily that Pittsburgh’s air has decreased in quality, but that Los Angeles’ air has improved - good news for them, bad news for Pittsburgh.

Oklahoma, according to the report, received varying grades from A to F for air quality. Tulsa and Oklahoma counties both received an F grade. Strangely, Cleveland County received an A grade - despite being right by Oklahoma County. I’m not sure how to explain that disparity.

Take a look at The State of the Air report and see what you think.

- Linds

indy.jpgJust a quick tidbit today about one of the most unusual green efforts I’ve ever heard of.

Harrison Ford - who, of course, is coming out with the new Indiana Jones movie very soon - wanted to show the world how terrible the deforestation is and bring it back to the public’s attention. To do so, he decided to do something so very odd to encourage people to think about the pain and effects of the millions of trees cut down yearly.

He got his chest waxed.

Supposedly, this brings home the point of the deep pain and nakedness left by removing trees from their habitats.

Waxing is painful, no doubt, but he’s a real manly man so handled it quite well, apparently!

I’m not sure if this was very misguided or very genius - knowing it would set the blogging world on fire with comments about it.

Well, it got our attention, so it must have worked somewhat!

- Linds

undefined

Today is Earth Day!

And what a gloomy day it is!  Completely overcast, raining, humid. It’s the kind of day that makes you change your desktop background to one of those gorgeous beach scenes with palm trees, soft, sandy beaches and blue skies. Sometimes I just sit at my desk and watch the screen saver change from one utopian scene to the next. Productive, I know.

But, if you’re lucky, you’ll be taking a summer vacation soon! And before you head off to paradise, be sure to pack your green sunscreen! I’m not referring to the green-colored zinc sunscreen that graces the noses of so many tourists in the tropics. I’m talking about eco-friendly sunscreens.

 Traditional sunscreens contain chemical UV filters, preservatives and sometimes coloring or scents that can wash off in the water and contaminate pools, oceans, lakes and streams. Some of those chemicals can even survive sewage treatment processes and are released back into the environment.

Researchers at the Polytechnic University in Marche, Italy conducted a study on how sunscreen affects coral reefs in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans. The researchers estimate that 4 to 6,000 metric tons of sunscreen washes off swimmers annually worldwide. The study concludes that even low levels of sunscreen chemicals could promote viral infections that can completely bleach coral in just four days.

Certain eco-parks in Mexico have already banned the use of sun-tan lotions and sunscreens with oils and chemical ingredients because they “damage marine flora and kill fish.”

Eco-friendly sunscreens like MelanSol, an all-natural, antioxidant-rich sunscreen, care chemical free and still provide great protection from UV rays.  Check out http://www.PureSunscreen.com for a complete list of ingredients. Other green sunscreen products can be found at www.pristineplanet.com.

I don’t know about you, but I’m ready to hit the beach. Until then, maybe I’ll put on some of this green sunscreen, just in case. I mean, the fluorescent lights in here are pretty strong, and this screen saver seems to really be doing the trick.

 Lisa

 

 

One of the commendable efforts consumers have made in the name of living green has been to switch to natural or organic cleaning products. With Earth Day today, perhaps even more consumers will make the switch. And it’s a good move. If we can avoid washing nasty chemicals down the drain, why not? But here’s a heads-up: All those cleaning products that claim to be “organic” or “natural” might not be all they’re cracked up to be.

A recent study by the Organic Consumers Association (a news report on the study can be found here shows that as many as 50 percent of products tested contained a detectable level of the carcinogen 1,4-dioxane. Some of the more well-known offending brands include Method and Seventh Generation. Officials with Method said they never claimed to have organic or natural products, just that their products are “naturally derived.” Fantastic bit of spin there. If you’re wondering, some of the worst products tested were body washes and dish soaps.

Many brands, including Clorox’s new Green Works line, had no detectable amount of 1,4-dioxane, which has been known to cause cancer in lab animals. A listing of all the products tested is available here: http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/DioxaneResults08.cfm.

- Nick

868023_newborn_drinking_milk.jpgThere’s big bisphenol A news coming out of Canada this week.

What is bisphenol A, you might ask, and why should we care what Canada has to say about it? Would you be more interested if I told you that bisphenol A is a harmful chemical that is almost assuredly in the systems of babies all over this country?

Bisphenol A, also referred to as BPA, is a chemical commonly found in food and drink packaging, including in cans of baby formula and even in baby bottles. At higher temperatures (read: those used when heating a baby bottle) the chemical is leached into a bottle’s contents (read: milk or formula). The chemical has been linked to early puberty in girls and prostate and breast cancer.

So where does Canada come in? According to newspaper reports from our northern neighbors, the Canadian health ministry is ready to declare BPA a dangerous substance. It would be the first example of a country making such a declaration.

Pressure is mounting for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to take similar action. A recent study by the National Toxicology Program, a branch of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, asks that the FDA “reconsider its view that the chemical bisphenol A is safe in products for use by infants and children,” according to news reports.

The National Toxicology Program’s study said: “There is some concern for neural and behavioral effects in fetuses, infants and children at current human exposures.”

The American Chemistry Council has weighed in with its spin, saying the NTP study confirms human exposure to BPA is extremely low and that there is no direct evidence that exposure adversely affects development in humans.

Doesn’t sound like a convincing argument that BPA is indeed not dangerous in any way. Really people, try any dangerous chemical you want, just make sure your exposure is extremely low and you’ll be all right. No thanks.

See the news report on the National Toxicology Program study here.

If you’re interested in safe baby bottles, you can go with glass or look for plastic bottles that specifically say they are BPA-free.

Also, see this NewsOK.com article: Nalgene to nix BPA bottles due to consumer concern

- Nick.

That is not a new challenge or bit of advice. Bringing your own lunch can save money and calories. Or it is supposed to anyway. But only if you compare that to eating out.

If you are buying prepackaged microwaveable or sandwich-kit lunches you may be doing neither and moreover you’re not making a healthy choice for Mother Nature.

Now this isn’t a scientific research study, just my guestimation. So you’re going to have to give me a bit of a break. But let’s think this over. I can make a sandwich with slices of lunch meat, cheese, tomatoes, cucumbers, lettuce, onion or whatever floats my boat tucked between two pieces of whole wheat bread. Toss it in a reusable container and I’ve got a nice healthy meal containing servings of fresh vegetables, dairy, fiber, etc. It’s filling and full of flavor. Call me Joey Tribbiani, but I love a good sandwich.

Now if you go this route, you’ve created no extra waste and you can even get bonus points if you’ve bought any of the ingredients from local food producers. It is possible to find bread, ham, cheese and veggies locally. You can pronounce and recognize the ingredients in your lunch. You have done something good for your body and the Earth. All this at a very low price.

Or you can buy a prepackaged microwaveable or sandwich-kit-type lunch, which are good and convenient and possibly good for you, too. I’m not a nutritionist so I have no idea about the specific nutritional benefits of any of these meals. But I do know that I like to eat, and lean and healthy cuisine choices leave a lot to be desired. I’ve never been one to fill my body with calories just because I need to. And have a strict rule that a meal should be enjoyed, not endured. But that is beside the point. Let’s examine the environmental implications of these.

Most microwaveable meals come in a plastic tray covered with cellophane wrap packaged inside of a cardboard box. That’s the simple kind. There are those new steamer entrees with all of the above plus an additional plastic strainer.

My favorite though is the sandwich kit. Inside of a cardboard box, there are three or four items individually wrapped in plastic, a cup of Jell-O sometimes, a plastic fork and napkin again wrapped in plastic and a condiment pouch.

These convenience lunches are trucked to your local megamarket from Northfield, Ill., and get additional checkmarks by their name for not supporting local food producers.

Now that being said, I’m a total fan of South Beach’s grilled chicken Caesar wrap and I dig the Southwestern-style chicken wrap. And being a wife and mother of two little ones with a full time job and a laundry list of extracurriculars, there have been days that I might not have eaten at all if it weren’t for meals wrapped in cardboard, because sometimes there isn’t even enough time to whip up a sandwich.

But sandwich fixings can be had for about $10 and that will get you through a week or maybe longer, with minimal addition to our local landfills and possibly helping out a local family and economy through the support of local foods. Now, for that same price you get only two to four days of cardboard lunches.

So I challenge you to a sandwich. Let’s encourage frozen lunch- and sandwich-kit outfits to incorporate less-is-more into their packaging philosophies. Write notes to your favorite lunch company and tell them how you feel. Another suggestion while we’re at it: change out that Jell-O for some chocolate pudding. That couldn’t hurt either.

— Lindsey

loud_speaker_woman1.jpgIt’s Earth Day on April 22nd and the Earth Day Network is encouraging us to make some noise and make people uncomfortable - sounds good to me.

Earth Day’s on a weekday, so your local legislator’s office will be open. Write a letter, call or e-mail your local legislator with your concerns about the environment (whether locally or globally. For Oklahoma, you can find the contact information for your representative here.

If your legislator sends you a response, please share that with us at the Go Green blog - we want to know who has been responsive and who hasn’t. We want to know what your local representative has planned to make your neighborhood more environmentally friendly.

The Earth Day Network are also encouraging you dedicated greeners to go to Washington D.C. to march on the mall and have your voice heard.

- Linds

bag.jpgMy wife and I recently took up the cause of going green in our everyday life. It’s been a little difficult so far and we’ve cut some corners, but it’s all about changing habits. Changing habits that are a long time in the making.

1. All new light bulbs: Sure, it cost a little extra money, but the savings should be noticeable soon and our carbon imprint has gone down. And if you dig deep enough in the Sunday paper, you can find good prices for the energy friendly light bulbs.

2. We’ve stopped buying large plastic bottles of water or soda. We only buy aluminum cans, because they are easier to recycle and are reusable if you can find a place to return them. Another way to stop buying the plastic water bottles is to buy a water filer and a water container. If you drink a lot of water, bigger container might be in order.

3. The final quick-fix we’ve made is to buy the canvas bags that are available on the internet. There are also earth-friendly reusable bags available at Target, Wal-Mart and even Home Depot. Basically, it means you don’t have to use the bad plastic bags that you carry groceries home in.

Here are a couple of other sights on the net that could help you make your life greener.

They have a way to go green for just about every part of your life.

A place to find canvas bags. They may be a bit expensive, but they last a long time.

- Matt

1. 5 is the number of planets we would need if everyone lived like the average North American.
http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/opl_brochure.pdf

2. Shoppers worldwide are using 500 billion to 1 trillion plastic bags per year. This translates to about 150 bags a year for every person on earth.
http://www.algalita.org/pdf/Action-sheet.pdf

3.83 percent of Americans now say global warming is a “serious” problem.
This is up from 70 percent in 2004.
http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=30085

4.4. According to some calculations, eating just 3 burgers a week can add between 941 and 1,023 pounds of greenhouse gases each year.
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/12/the_carbon_foot_1.php

5.The average American has about 2.5 times the ecological footprint of the average Italian.
http://www.footprintnetwork.org/index.php

(from Treehugger.com)

- Matt

Next Page »