By John Sutter

The Boise City News today printed a monster headline announcing — kind of — the governor’s visit to the drought-stricken area of the Oklahoma Panhandle.

“He Finally Made It!?! July 16 2008 It’s G-Day,” the headline reads.

The paper still seems to question whether or not a drought that’s been compared to the 1930s Dust Bowl will be enough to get Gov. Brad Henry to visit. The governor allegedly has never visited distant Cimarron County, with a sparse population of 2,664.

According to C.F. David, the paper’s publisher, owner and editor, the lead story begins: “If Oklahoma Gov. Brad Henry shows up in Cimarron County today as he’s promised, it will have taken him 2011 days, or 5 years 6 months and three days to travel the 350 odd miles form the state capital to Boise City. But to make the trip the governor will have flown rather than driven. So he will still be in the dark about how much the entire Panhandle needs highway dollars. Maybe next time.”

By phone at about 11 a.m., an hour before the governor’s scheduled visit, David said he had written the governor two massive $50 checks — one for show, and one to answer a bounty he’s had out on Henry since 2006. In print, David has offered $50 up to anyone who could prove Henry has visited Cimarron County since he took office as governor.

When the meet this afternoon, David plans to hand over the check. Henry plans to donate the money to charity, according to the Associated Press.

At about 11 a.m., David said by phone that he still was delivering newspapers. Then he planned to go home, change into a t-shirt that promotes Cimarron County, and get ready to meet the governor.

The purpose of the visit is to talk about the drought, but David said he hopes the governor takes home a broader message.

“Even though there are less than 3,000 voters up here, we are part of Oklahoma and we need to be respected and heard,” he said.

He hopes that message resonates with future political candidates also, he said.

By John Sutter

State Rep. Randy Terrill — the Moore Republican best known for authoring Oklahoma’s hard-line immigration law, once considered to be the toughest in the nation — announced this week that he will again propose legislation to promote alternative energy in Oklahoma, according to a news release.

“In Oklahoma, we have done a good job of encouraging new oil-and-gas exploration,” the release says. “It’s time to give support to alternative energy technologies that will generate energy in the quantity that we require.”

The legislation is said to offer tax credits for people who install solar, wind or geothermal energy in their homes. It would give a 40 percent rebate on the costs of installing wind or solar energy, the release says.

Thought this was interesting since environmental issues often come with a liberal tag.

By John Sutter

On Monday, President Bush lifted an executive ban on offshore drilling for oil. Bush said the act puts pressure on Congress to reciprocate by voting to end its moratorium on offshore drilling, which has been in place since 1981.

Both the congressional and executive bans would have to be lifted in order for the drilling to occur.

Bush said the move would help Americans who are hurting because of high gas prices at the pump. Environmentalists quickly pointed out that offshore drilling will have no impact on gas prices in the short term, and could cause devastating consequences for the environment.

Jim Presswood, an energy advocate at the Natural Resources Defense Council, issued this statement:

“In 2006, President Bush declared that the United States is addicted to oil. Today, he suggested we get a bigger needle.

“The disastrous pro-big oil policies of President Bush and his allies in Congress have left us more addicted to oil than ever. Americans deserve policies that free us from fossil fuels and give us better choices that will bring down our energy costs, make our air cleaner, and help solve global warming.

For more background on the issue read stories from the San Fran Chronicle, The Oklahoman, Tulsa World and Washington Post.

I’ve pulled quotes from Oklahoma-relevant officials below:

U.S. Rep. Mary Fallin, an Oklahoma City Republican:

“It is obvious that one immediate solution to rising energy prices is to find and develop more domestic oil and gas reserves. Modern technologies have made offshore drilling safer and cleaner than ever before.”

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, a Tulsa Republican:

“Currently, 85 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf — an estimated 19 billion barrels of recoverable oil — is off limits. At today’s import levels, this is the equivalent of 35 years of imports from Saudi Arabia.”

Larry Nichols, chief executive of Devon Energy Corp.:

“For a long time, our political leaders could do what environmentalists wanted and still deliver cheap energy. But those days are over. They are over forever. And when they are asked about how they justify these bans and other restrictions on the development of all forms of energy, those are going to be difficult questions for some people to answer.”

Barack Obama, presumptive Dem. nominee for president

“This is not something that’s going to give consumers short-term relief and it is not a long-term solution to our problems with fossil fuels generally and oil in particular.”

John McCain, presumptive Rep. nominee for president

On Monday, McCain made lifting the federal ban on offshore oil and gas development a key part of his energy plan. McCain said states should be allowed to pursue energy exploration in waters near their coasts and get some of the royalty revenue. (AP reporting)

The town of Picher sits beneath 100-foot mountains of toxic mine waste, left over from a time when the area of far northeast Oklahoma was one of the biggest lead and zinc mining sites in the world. In May, a tornado leveled half of the town.

It took a town to find help for Tar Creek

By John David Sutter
Staff Writer

PICHER — Over the years, many have championed the cause of this polluted lead and zinc mining town from behind the scenes.

The former northeastern Oklahoma mining district, called Tar Creek, has been on the government’s list of high-priority environmental cleanup sites since 1983. In recent years, residents have slowly left the area, as a government-funded program pays willing people for their property.

Behind the politics of that plan and many others, local advocacy has been present. A local nurse was the first to suggest mine waste near the town of Picher might be poisoning kids. A nuclear scientist returned to his hometown and pushed for a look at massive cave-ins caused by extensive subterranean mine workings. And a guidance counselor has been drawing attention to poisoned waters at the site for more than a decade.

Meanwhile, in a campaign ad, Republican U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe claims to be responsible for the environmental cleanup and buyout program.

In the commercial, titled “One Man in America,” a narrator says: “Tar Creek: poisoned earth, the threat of schools and churches sinking into abandoned mines. Everyone thought it would be too much to tackle, except for one stubborn man named Inhofe.”

Some residents say a buyout, which is unfinished, wouldn’t have happened without Inhofe.

But before any politicians got involved, common people have fought to put Tar Creek on the government’s radar for more than three decades.

George Mayer: The rancher

 

The prairie was oozing orange, and George Mayer is said to be the first to have taken notice. On his ranch in Commerce, just down the road from the former Tri-State Mining District, rust-colored water started seeping out of the ground in 1979 or 1980.

It stained the legs and backs of Mayer’s white Arabian horses that roamed the field. It burned the hair off their legs, left open sores, and sizzled right through a metal bucket, according to a newspaper report.

As hard as her husband tried, he couldn’t get the stains off, said Maxine Mayer, George’s widow. George Mayer’s son, Jody Mayer, said it looked like the horses were wearing red socks.

According to a 1983 story by the Times-Post News Service, the U.S. Geological survey published a report in 1978 that predicted the coming problems associated with 10.75 billion gallons of acid mine water that had filled the mines.

After the mines closed in 1970, pumps that kept the cavernous mines from flooding with groundwater were turned off. Soon the caves filled with water, that water picked up heavy metals, turned acidic and crept up to the surface, where it oxidized.

George embarked on a research and public relations campaign to warn people about the pollution he’d found, said Jody Mayer, 62. His father, who died in 1998, called the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Jody Mayer said, and soon government officials and news reporters were swarming the area.

“It threw up the red flag,” Jody Mayer said.

By 1981, the state government developed a plan to address water pollution at Tar Creek, and in 1983 the federal government listed Tar Creek as one of the must urgent hazardous waste sites in its Superfund program.

Dr. Shirley Chesnut: The physician

 

The child patients were funneling in at an alarming rate, all with the same symptoms: trouble paying attention, trouble reading and trouble learning. It perplexed Dr. Shirley Chesnut, who was working at the Miami Indian Health Clinic in the early 1990s. All the kids were coming from nearby Picher, and she thought teachers might be over-diagnosing attention deficit disorder.

Then a nurse made a connection: “Well, it could be lead,” Carol Barnett told Dr. Chesnut.

About 10 years after Tar Creek was declared a Superfund site, no one had tested local kids to see if the toxic metals had ended up in their blood, damaging their central nervous systems.

After Barnett raised the issue, Chesnut said she started an informal program to blood test kids for lead.

The results were alarming.

“I’ll never forget it, because probably every child we checked came back with a high lead level,” she said.

Chesnut tested her own children, and three of the four had high lead levels, she said.

Chesnut didn’t have time to do an overall study of the situation, said Rebecca Jim, who interviewed health workers about the situation for a book. A graduate student stepped in to analyze the results, she said.

In 1994, the clinic reported that 35 percent of the American Indian kids tested had high blood lead levels.

The government began testing for lead in the blood of residents and in the soil.

The results came in 1996 and offered similar results — 31.2 percent of kids in the area had blood lead levels higher than 10 micrograms per deciliter, the government’s safety limit.

Years later, in 2004, the information about these public health risks, pushed Gov. Brad Henry to propose a plan to pay all families with children 6 years old and younger to leave the Superfund site.

Henry’s spokesman, Paul Sund, said that plan would never have happened without blood testing; and, he said, the Inhofe buyout wouldn’t be happening if the 2004 effort hadn’t served as a template.

Rebecca Jim: The counselor

 

For 14 years, Rebecca Jim has held fake fishing tournaments near, but not in, Tar Creek. No one ever catches anything, and that’s the point: the water is too toxic for aquatic life to survive. “There aren’t any fish yet, so we’re still just practicing,” said Jim, who is a former guidance counselor from Miami, OK.

Jim founded the Local Environmental Action Demanded (L.E.A.D.) Agency in part to draw attention to how large of an area is being damaged by the mine waste and how many people are being hurt.

In addition to the fishing tournaments, she also hosts a conference to raise local awareness about Tar Creek.

With input from Jim and Earl Hatley, the state posted an advisory that warns locals about the dangers of eating too much fish caught in Tar Creek, the Neosho River, Spring River and Grand Lake, said Jay Wright, who worked on the project with the state Department of Environmental Quality.

Wright said Jim helped the agency realize that some American Indians in the area pressure cook fish, eating the bones and skin, which are potentially the most toxic parts of fish that they live around heavy metals. A previous study hadn’t taken local eating habits into account, he said.

“They’ve done a lot to raise public awareness on a lot of fronts, and frankly to encourage public agencies to take a look at the situation a little closer — and maybe look at it in ways that we hadn’t thought about looking at it before,” Wright said of Jim and Hatley.

Jim still is advocating for continued environmental cleanup, and will host a 10th Tar Creek conference September 15 to 17.

“Once people are out of the epicenter (of Tar Creek), it doesn’t mean the problem is gone,” she said. “The problem is still huge. It’s just huge beyond belief.”

She’s hopeful that fish will be able to live in Tar Creek again soon, with continued federal attention. Then, her fishing tournaments can be real — instead of held in protest.

Jim Inhofe: the senator

 

Cave-ins have long been reported in the unstable mining area at Tar Creek. In the 1960s, houses actually sunk into the mine working. Picher’s Main Street was shut down in the ’50s because the fear of cave-ins was so great. And, prior to 1986, there were 59 collapses that sank craters more than 95 feet across, according to a government report.

Despite all these warning signs, the cave-in risks were never studied on a large scale until 2006, when a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers report was released.

The results surpassed anything Inhofe expected. Two-hundred eighty-six homes, businesses and churches were found to be at risk for collapse.

Inhofe said in an interview that he decided to put increased attention on Tar Creek in 2003, when he became chair of the senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee.

In 2004, he used that sway to pass a bill through congress that authorized $45 million for cleanup on the fringes of the Tar Creek site.

Some residents criticized that plan.

“I can find no indication, through his actions or his words, that the problems of these children matter,” Mark Osborn, a physician from Miami, told the Associated Press in 2003.

Inhofe was adamantly opposed to a public buyout, and in a December 2003 interview with the Tulsa World, he said: “There will never be a buyout. I promise you that.”

The powerful senator changed his tune recently, and he attributes the change to the $2 million 2006 report — which he commissioned and funded. It quantified and specified the risks for cave-ins.

While others called for a buyout on the merits of health and environmental risks in the area, Inhofe never supported one until safety and cave-ins became the issue.

The senator helped redirect cleanup money to pay residents to start leaving the area. Locals praise him for those efforts, saying Inhofe stepped in to aid them when other politicians wouldn’t or couldn’t.

When asked if he single-handedly is responsible for the current buyout program and environmental cleanup at Tar Creek, as he claims in his campaign ad, Inhofe said:

“Would we be where we are today, with almost to solution of a problem that’s been there for 30 years, without my being involved?” he said. “That’s the question you need to ask.”

Ed Keheley: the scientist

 

Keheley is a Picher native who returned to town after a career as a top nuclear weapons engineer at a U.S. Department of Energy lab. Tired of the stress that led him to pop antacids on his morning and afternoon commutes in California, Keheley moved back home in 1997 for a simpler life. He was shocked to find his hometown was part of the EPA’s hazardous waste program.

He had to get involved, he said. So Keheley set out to conduct his own investigation.

He sifted through news articles about the earth swallowing up homes. He dug through mining maps, which showed 100-foot caves underground, some only 100 feet from the surface. And he found out that support pillars that held those cave ceilings in place often were blasted out before the mines closed, so the mining companies could extract remaining ore.

At first, Keheley said, Inhofe and other officials “turned a deaf ear” to local efforts to draw attention to the unstable area.

“There is a class system alive and well in the United States, and if you are a small rural community that doesn’t have a voting bloc, you do not have the same access to federal resources and federal officials,” he said, adding: “When we were trying to focus attention on Tar Creek, he (Inhofe) was pretty much ignoring us.” Keheley said Inhofe’s aides ignored — and sometimes rudely dismissed — concerns about the environmental health of Tar Creek.

The senator’s office wouldn’t discuss the safety of the area or the possibility of getting residents of harm’s way, Keheley said.

In April 2004, Keheley said he got to have a discussion with the senator.

They sat at opposing ends of a conference table, Keheley said.

Keheley said he persuaded Inhofe to go on a private tour of Tar Creek with him. The experience helped convince Inhofe there was a serious risk for cave-ins, he said. After the meeting, Keheley told the media: “We expected to be read the Riot Act, but he really surprised us.”

“Never in my wildest dreams would I have said he’s the guy that’s going to step forward and solve this,” Keheley said of Inhofe, “but that’s one of the oddities of life. I’m certainly thankful for what he’s done.”

Keheley said he thinks the buyout would not have happened without Inhofe’s support.

He called the senator’s campaign commercial a “flamboyant” attempt to take full credit for positive strides at Tar Creek, and said other politicians with access to the same resources as Inhofe would have made similar decisions.

TAR CREEK TIMELINE

1904: Underground lead and zinc mining starts in Picher, in the northeast corner of Oklahoma. 1920s: The mining peaks.

1950s: The mines decline, and Picher closes its Main Street because of a cave-in.

1960s: Homes sink into abandoned mine workings.

1970: Mining stops.

1978: The U.S. Geological Survey warns of future problems associated with nearly 10.75 billion gallons of acid water that in the underground mines.

1983: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency declares Tar Creek a high-priority waste site in the Superfund program.

1994: A local nurse-doctor team first suspected a connection between lead mine waste and learning deficiencies at Picher-Cardin Schools.

1995: People living near Tar Creek begin holding annual fake fishing competitions to tell the government they believe fish and waters in the area are unhealthy.

1996: Government tests show 31.2 percent of kids in the area have blood lead levels higher than 10 micrograms per deciliter, the government limit.

1998: A local environmental advocacy group begins holding public conferences about Tar Creek.

2003: U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe spars with U.S. Rep. Brad Carson over a buyout at Tar Creek. Carson favors a buyout. In December, Inhofe tells the Tulsa World: “There will never be a buyout. I promise you that.”

2004: Inhofe, R-Tulsa, funds an “omnibus bill” that includes $45 million for cleanup on the periphery of the Tar Creek site.

2004: Gov. Brad Henry, a Democrat, calls for the government to pay willing families with kids ages 6 and younger to relocate from the Superfund site.

2004: Inhofe meets with residents. Some locals say Inhofe ignored their concerns before that April 2004 meeting.

2005: Inhofe uses sway as chair of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to fund a $2 million study of cave-in risks.

2006: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers releases a report saying 286 properties at the Tar Creek site are at risk for cave-ins. The $2 million report was commissioned by Inhofe.

2006: The corps report leads Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Tulsa, to call for a government-sponsored buyout.

2007: The state Department of Environmental Quality releases a warning that fish between Tar Creek and Grand Lake may be contaminated with toxic heavy metals.

2008: On May 10, an EF-4 tornado levels half of Picher, killing six. The buyout remains half finished. EPA officials estimate the cleanup process will take 30 more years.

Sources: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, The Oklahoman, The Associated Press, Tulsa World, the office of U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, Rebecca Jim, Ed Keheley.

Illinois River

The heads of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board sent this letter to our editorial page. It is, in effect, a response to this front page story in The Oklahoman. The officials call statewide water pollution “troubling” and ask the state Legislature to double — to about $2 million — the money Oklahoma uses to test its waters. Most aren’t tested at all.

Let me know what you all think.

–John Sutter

Here’s the text of their letter:

A recent report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality detailing the pollution status of our rivers, streams and lakes has received much attention. Required of all states every two years, the report includes a detailed list of “impaired” waters, or those not meeting their desired uses, as prescribed by Oklahoma’s water quality standards, maintained by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. The report indicates that some form of pollution afflicts about three out of every four water bodies in our state. ew

Although not uncommon for most states, the level of impaired streams in Oklahoma is indeed troubling. However, the list does provide an opportunity for state water agencies to develop plans to address the impairment. All state water agencies work in concert to evaluate resulting data, determine the current status of individual waters and establish protective measures, especially related to human health and the environment.

Maybe more troubling is the fact that many rivers, streams and lakes aren’t being monitored. Therefore, insufficient data exist for agencies to comprehensively determine where all impairments are occurring and develop plans to address those impairments.

The DEQ and OWRB have entered into an important partnership to survey the surface water resources of Oklahoma. Through the statewide Beneficial Use Monitoring Program (BUMP), OWRB staff collects water samples from hundreds of stream and lake sites each year. Those samples are analyzed for a variety of parameters in the field.

Officials at the DEQ and OWRB continually strive to leverage limited funds and resources to provide the maximum benefit to taxpayers. We prioritize sampling locations and lab analyses and we stretch supplies, all while attempting to maintain the overall integrity of our program. Due to budgetary limitations, our agencies regularly sample and assess only about 25 percent of Oklahoma’s surface water bodies, and there is no state program in place to monitor the overall quality of our groundwaters.

Rising program and fuel costs coupled with no new appropriations present even more challenges. Our appropriations remain stable, but the need for water-quality data and more informed decision-making only increases. We’re at the point where it’s not a question of how much water-quality information we need, but how much we are willing to invest in. Improving Oklahoma’s water quality has become a citizen priority and it must become a state priority as well.

Clearly, a balance has to be struck between the cost of water, its treatment and delivery, and the benefits of reducing impairments to Oklahoma’s water quality. This issue will be addressed when an interim legislative committee convenes later this year to study Oklahoma’s monitoring program. The OWRB and DEQ are making BUMP funding a co-agency priority during next year’s legislative session. The ongoing update of the Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan provides a separate opportunity to enhance our monitoring efforts. In the meantime, we want to reassure the public that its state agencies are working diligently together to improve the quality of our waters and the programs we use to manage them.

Smith is executive director of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Thompson is executive director of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.

By John Sutter

After being petitioned by the governor, the state agriculture secretary, two U.S. senators and a U.S. congressman, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced on Thursday that it will send drought relief to two Oklahoma Panhandle counties hit with a drought that’s been compared to the devastating 1930s Dust Bowl.

The disaster declaration comes after state Agriculture Secretary Terry Peach said that drought relief likely wouldn’t come until September. The drought has plagued Cimarron and Texas counties–at the western end of the Panhandle–for more than a year. Climatologists and officials didn’t take notice until the spring, after a Cimarron County commissioner sent a letter to state government.

Conservation officials prompted that letter, and, in effect, it led to the area being given the government’s most severe drought rating– “exceptional” — and to recent visits by Peach and Assistant State Climatologist Gary McManus.

Read more about the people of the Panhandle and the lead-up to Thursday’s disaster declaration in previous blog posts.

Mozambique is set to expand its natural gas industry so the African country can reduce its dependence on petroleum. The country wants to power cars using its natural gas reserves, which the BBC says are estimated at 3.6 trillion cubit feet in one province.

Sounds a LITTLE bit like the “Pickens Plan”: the billionaire is calling for increased wind energy for electricity and a transfer of natural gas assets to cars.

Facebook IS international these days …

–John

By John Sutter

Billionaire oil tycoon turned alt. energy advocate T. Boone Pickens took his wind power advocacy to a whole new level this week with a public relations campaign he’s calling the “Pickens Plan.”

Check out the video above. You’ll see Pickens go into teacher mode as he draws on a marker board and talks over graphs about our nation’s energy usage. His plan would involved a $1 trillion government investment in wind energy. That would enable the country to produce 22 percent its electricity from wind, freeing up natural gas for use in automobiles. Bada bing! Less dependence on foreign oil, he says.

Of course, Pickens stands to benefit from such a proposition. As The Guardian points out, he’s invested $12 billion on a wind farm in the Texas Panhandle. Compared to that number, the price of his “Pickens Plan” campaign seems small: $58 million, reportedly.

The PR blitz is all over the internet. Pickens has set up a Facebook page, a YouTube channel and there’s an entire Web site devoted to his plan.

In interviews with other news media, Pickens has said his advocacy for wind power is not motivated purely by profit. Environmental groups seem to be loving his stances.

What do you all think?

(Here’s a good analysis of how other media are covering this story, from the Knight Science Journalism Tracker)

By John Sutter

Today’s front page story is on a bee farmer from southwest Oklahoma who recently was chosen to be featured on a cable TV program called “Trick My Truck.”

Gary Grose used the opportunity to talk about the “peril” of honeybees in America. He says the bees’ habitats have been destroyed to a point that beekeepers like him have to drive their bee hives all around the country so the bees can pollinate crops. That used to just happen naturally, but a host of threats to the bees — everything from pesticides to mites to cellphone towers — make wild living and pollination almost impossible, he said.

The issue has gotten some attention lately from media outlets. A mysterious syndrome called Colony Collapse Disorder is thought to be to blame for mass disappearances of honeybees. Ice cream sellers are taking notice of the issue, also. Haagen-Dasz says 40 percent of its flavors come from honey, and so it’s launched this game-based Web site and an ad to encourage people to learn more about the bees. The ad is supposedly a page of a magazine that you can rip out and then plant in the ground. It’s laced with seeds that are supposed to grow plants that are hospitable to bees.

What do you think? Is this a bunch of hype about protecting bees? Should we do more? Has anyone besides me been stung by a honeybee on the tip of their toe lately? Please comment. ( I won’t beg … but it’s getting close.)

By John Sutter

For this morning’s paper, I wrote a story about scattered rain that’s fallen recently on the drought-ridden Oklahoma Panhandle — nourishing one couple’s hope that they’ll be able to keep their cattle, and their ranch.

I left out a fun detail, though.

There’s a newsman in Boise City named C.F. David. He’s the publisher/owner/editor of The Boise City News, a weekly paper that’s been prodding Gov. Brad Henry for two years to visit Cimarron County, at the western end of the Panhandle.

David has a $50 “bounty” out for anyone who can prove the governor has been to Cimarron County before. The governor’s spokesman says Henry’s never visited. You’d think the newsman would be thrilled that the governor now says he’ll visit the Panhandle soon (although he’s yet to set a date), to take a look at drought conditions that locals are comparing to the 30s Dust Bowl.

But David’s got his doubts.

If the governor comes, David said he will hand him a $50 check: an answer to his bounty. But until that happens — and this is the part I left out — David is telling locals to send the governor Oklahoma maps. He asked them to circle Boise City on the map, and trace the 6-hour route from Oklahoma City to the Panhandle for him.

Maybe he just doesn’t know the way.

Next Page »