<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Morris &#187; cloverfield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/davemorris/category/cloverfield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/davemorris</link>
	<description>From the desk of the Director of Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cloverfield better than expected</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/davemorris/2008/01/19/cloverfield-better-than-expected/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/davemorris/2008/01/19/cloverfield-better-than-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davemorris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cloverfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/davemorris/2008/01/19/cloverfield-better-than-expected/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw Cloverfield tonight. I had two things on my mind as I paid $7.50 at Penn Square: motion sickness and the countless reviews I read beforehand.

Blair Witch about made me sick from the camera movements, and it didn&#8217;t take long into Cloverfield before I started feeling similar nausea. But it wasn&#8217;t too bad. After ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Cloverfield tonight. I had two things on my mind as I paid $7.50 at Penn Square: motion sickness and the countless reviews I read beforehand.
<p>
Blair Witch about made me sick from the camera movements, and it didn&#8217;t take long into Cloverfield before I started feeling similar nausea. But it wasn&#8217;t too bad. After awhile, you really wished they had more steady camera shots. Or maybe, after seeing the film you wished you could watch it again with a standard Hollywood camera approach. Kind of a, ok what really happened in Manhattan.
<p>
Most reviews I read were positive. But some, like the NY Times, thought the movie was stupid.
<p>
Honestly, it was better than I expected. The storyline was actually good. The monster was scarier than most. I don&#8217;t get scared from movies. Never have. And the Cloverfield monster wasn&#8217;t going to come close. But as a demonic beast that attacks Times Square monster goes, it didn&#8217;t look bad. And the destruction of Manhattan was well done by the expensive special effects houses they employed.
<p>
Since I had just been to Manhattan last month, the movie probably appealed to me more than it would have a few months ago.<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/davemorris/2008/01/19/cloverfield-better-than-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
