<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global population will keep getting older, Census says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2009/06/23/global-population-will-keep-getting-older-census-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2009/06/23/global-population-will-keep-getting-older-census-says/</link>
	<description>Your Right to Know in a Digital World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Steere</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2009/06/23/global-population-will-keep-getting-older-census-says/comment-page-1/#comment-61352</link>
		<dc:creator>An Steere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/?p=534#comment-61352</guid>
		<description>In this grand scheme of things you actually receive  a B- for effort. Exactly where you lost me personally was on the details. As it is said, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more correct in this article. Having said that, permit me inform you precisely what did deliver the results. The writing is actually extremely convincing which is probably why I am taking an effort in order to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, even though I can easily notice the jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily convinced of just how you appear to unite the points which make the actual final result. For the moment I will subscribe to your point but wish in the foreseeable future you actually connect the dots better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this grand scheme of things you actually receive  a B- for effort. Exactly where you lost me personally was on the details. As it is said, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more correct in this article. Having said that, permit me inform you precisely what did deliver the results. The writing is actually extremely convincing which is probably why I am taking an effort in order to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, even though I can easily notice the jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily convinced of just how you appear to unite the points which make the actual final result. For the moment I will subscribe to your point but wish in the foreseeable future you actually connect the dots better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

