Global population will keep getting older, Census says
The number of people aged 65 and older in the U.S. will reach more than 89 million by 2050, more than double the 39 million today , the U.S. Census Bureau said in its latest population projections.
Now, less than 8 percent of the world’s population is 65 and older. That will increase to 12 percent in 2030 and 16 percent by 2050, according to census projections.
“This shift in the age structure of the world’s population poses challenges to society, families, businesses, health care providers and policymakers to meet the needs of aging individuals,” said Wan He, demographer in the Census Bureau’s Population Division.
China and India will continue to be the world’s most populous countries by 2050, but India will overtake China as the world’s most populous country in 2031, according to updated rankings.
Here’s a closer look at the U.S. projections:
| Demographic Indicators | 2050 | 1995 | 2005 | 2015 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | |||||
| Midyear population (in thousands) | 439,010 | 266,557 | 295,561 | 325,540 | 357,452 |
| Growth rate (percent) | 0.8 | N/A | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Fertility | |||||
| Total fertility rate (births per woman) | 2.0 | N/A | N/A | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Crude birth rate (per 1,000 population) | 13 | N/A | 14 | 14 | 13 |
| Births (in thousands) | 5,672 | N/A | 4,138 | 4,470 | 4,726 |
| Mortality | |||||
| Life expectancy at birth (years) | 83 | N/A | N/A | 79 | 80 |
| Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 births) | 4 | N/A | N/A | 6 | 5 |
| Under 5 mortality rate (per 1,000 births) | 4 | N/A | N/A | 7 | 5 |
| Crude death rate (per 1,000 population) | 10 | N/A | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| Deaths (in thousands) | 4,263 | N/A | 2,447 | 2,728 | 3,088 |
| Migration | |||||
| Net migration rate (per 1,000 population) | 5 | N/A | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Net number of migrants (in thousands) | 2,055 | N/A | 978 | 1,387 | 1,576 |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Data Base.
–Paul
Written by Paul Monies
Follow @pmonies
Thank you for joining our conversation on Data Watch. We encourage your discussion but ask that you stay within the bounds of our commenting and posting policy.
In this grand scheme of things you actually receive a B- for effort. Exactly where you lost me personally was on the details. As it is said, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more correct in this article. Having said that, permit me inform you precisely what did deliver the results. The writing is actually extremely convincing which is probably why I am taking an effort in order to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, even though I can easily notice the jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily convinced of just how you appear to unite the points which make the actual final result. For the moment I will subscribe to your point but wish in the foreseeable future you actually connect the dots better.