<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A victory for openness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2008/03/26/a-victory-for-openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2008/03/26/a-victory-for-openness/</link>
	<description>Your Right to Know in a Digital World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:14:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technology and the OK Supreme Court &#124; Data Watch</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2008/03/26/a-victory-for-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-3929</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology and the OK Supreme Court &#124; Data Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2008/03/26/a-victory-for-openness/#comment-3929</guid>
		<description>[...] a ruling last year that would have stopped online access to court filings across the state. They rescinded that ruling after complaints from the public, the media and open-records [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a ruling last year that would have stopped online access to court filings across the state. They rescinded that ruling after complaints from the public, the media and open-records [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan McNeill</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2008/03/26/a-victory-for-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/datawatch/2008/03/26/a-victory-for-openness/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update. 

I have to wonder, though: Why do they need a &quot;task force&quot; to study whether or not to participate in the 21st century?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update. </p>
<p>I have to wonder, though: Why do they need a &#8220;task force&#8221; to study whether or not to participate in the 21st century?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
