<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bookmarking &#187; best of 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking/category/best-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking</link>
	<description>Chris Carroll's own private library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Best Books of 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking/2008/12/13/best-books-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking/2008/12/13/best-books-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris carroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best of 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking/2008/12/13/best-books-of-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would take me until 2018 to get into all the books on the various &#8220;Best of 2008&#8243; lists, but I just can&#8217;t help looking over all those lists anyway and inevitably adding more and more books to my own list of books to read.  As we&#8217;ve seen, lists create plenty of unsolveable problems.

 The New York ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would take me until 2018 to get into all the books on the various &#8220;Best of 2008&#8243; lists, but I just can&#8217;t help looking over all those lists anyway and inevitably adding more and more books to my own list of books to read.  <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking/2008/12/10/before-you-die" title="As we've seen">As we&#8217;ve seen</a>, lists create plenty of unsolveable problems.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://poetryfoundation.org/harriet/DPL_Heap_of_papers_c._1920-30_00186429_Y.jpg" /></p>
<p> The <em>New York Times Book Review</em> has helpfully pared down its list of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/books/review/10Best-t.html?_r=1&amp;em">&#8220;The 10 Best Books of 2008,&#8221;</a> narrowing it even further with five fiction and five non-fiction titles.  That&#8217;s the way to do it &#8212; drop a clean, concise Top 10 list like Moses on Mt. Sinai and always leave the crowd asking for more.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really still asking for more, the <em>New York Times</em> is also glad to provide an exhaustive <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/books/review/100Notable-t.html?pagewanted=1">&#8220;100 Notable Books of 2008&#8243;</a> list with capsule reviews and links to longer write-ups for fiction and non-fiction titles.</p>
<p><em>Publisher&#8217;s Weekly</em> weighs in with its even lengthier <a target="_blank" href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6610357.html">&#8220;Best Books of the Year&#8221;</a> list, but they&#8217;ve at least helpfully narrowed it down to 13 different genres including Mystery, Religion, Poetry and three separate children&#8217;s genres.</p>
<p>Amazon.com goes all-out with its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/Best-2008-Books-Holidays-Seasonal/b?ie=UTF8&amp;node=1239030011">&#8220;Best Books of 2008&#8243;</a> section, which includes &#8220;Top 100&#8243; lists from both editors and customers as well as 10 different genre lists.  Their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=s9alfla_c7_feat-rfc_p?ie=UTF8&amp;docId=1000297241&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=center-7&amp;pf_rd_r=1AN4WT2P15KZMC7KEWTS&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=459147001&amp;pf_rd_i=1239030011">&#8220;Top 10 Best Book Covers&#8221;</a> list is an especially fun one to judge for yourself.</p>
<p>NPR&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96539642">&#8220;Best Books of 2008&#8243;</a> webpage is packed with interesting content, including exerpts from books in over a dozen genres, audio stories and interviews with authors, and cool gift book recommendations.</p>
<p>Salon.com features a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.salon.com/books/awards/2008/12/08/2008/">&#8220;Book Awards 2008&#8243;</a> section with a thoughful intoduction and 10 capsule reviews of their &#8220;most pleasurable&#8221; fiction and non-fiction titles.</p>
<p><em>Time</em> magazine&#8217;s online <a target="_blank" href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2008/top10/#arts" title="Top 10 Everything of 2008">&#8220;Top 10 Everything of 2008&#8243;</a> section features lists for fiction, non-fiction, and children&#8217;s books.  It&#8217;s also a rabbit-hole of dozens of authoritative 2008 lists from which list-making, list-reading list-lovers may not emerge for several list-frenzied hours.</p>
<p>After glancing at all these &#8220;Best Books&#8221; lists and seeing the late Roberto Bolano&#8217;s novel <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/2666-Novel-Roberto-Bolano/dp/0374100144/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1229195102&amp;sr=1-1" title="2666">2666</a> high on almost every one of them, I&#8217;m still not sure I&#8217;m ready to tackle this 912 page monster that Time&#8217;s reviewer describes as &#8220;baffling, maddening, difficult, violent, obscene, over-indulgent, under-edited, and way too long&#8221; in a review that also calls it &#8220;the best novel of the year.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img width="363" src="http://www.earlyword.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/2666.jpg" height="560" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.newsok.com/bookmarking/2008/12/13/best-books-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
