<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gators experienced on offense, not on defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from The Oklahoman Sports Columnist Berry Tramel &#124; NewsOK.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6223</guid>
		<description>OU got their suck on tonight!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OU got their suck on tonight!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6222</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6222</guid>
		<description>Randy? 

&quot;Head to head does not matter that much compared to a seasons worth of games&quot;

As I asked 2 days ago: &quot;I wonder how OU’s head-to-head loss to Florida will be spun.&quot;

Spin it, Randy. Spin it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy? </p>
<p>&#8220;Head to head does not matter that much compared to a seasons worth of games&#8221;</p>
<p>As I asked 2 days ago: &#8220;I wonder how OU’s head-to-head loss to Florida will be spun.&#8221;</p>
<p>Spin it, Randy. Spin it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6193</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6193</guid>
		<description>If Utah can win a National Championship, then OU should leave the Big 12 for an easier Conference. They could be in the title game every year. Alabama was way overrated and Georgia struggled to beat Michigan St. Florida has no Seniors on defense and the Sooners are going to light up the scoreboard like a pin ball machine. Tebow is overrated, there&#039;s a reason he came in 3 place in the Heisman voting. This is going to one of the Sooners greatest games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Utah can win a National Championship, then OU should leave the Big 12 for an easier Conference. They could be in the title game every year. Alabama was way overrated and Georgia struggled to beat Michigan St. Florida has no Seniors on defense and the Sooners are going to light up the scoreboard like a pin ball machine. Tebow is overrated, there&#8217;s a reason he came in 3 place in the Heisman voting. This is going to one of the Sooners greatest games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6187</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6187</guid>
		<description>Texas and espn drive me crazy. It was a three way tie. Corso and Herbie keep saying that head to head matters since tech is out of the discussion. The problem is that the only reason tech is out of the discussion is that OU killed them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas and espn drive me crazy. It was a three way tie. Corso and Herbie keep saying that head to head matters since tech is out of the discussion. The problem is that the only reason tech is out of the discussion is that OU killed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6184</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6184</guid>
		<description>Not sure I follow Randy&#039;s thought process there. You undermine Texas&#039;s win over OU, saying &quot;Head to head does not matter that much compared to a seasons worth of games. If one game matters that much then a 12 game season is WAY too LONG!!!&quot;

Then you undermine USC&#039;s claim to superiority by saying, &quot;A loss is a loss no matter if it is a fluke buy 1 point of 50.&quot;

I guess it depends on how the loss affects OU&#039;s stature. I wonder how OU&#039;s head-to-head loss to Florida will be spun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I follow Randy&#8217;s thought process there. You undermine Texas&#8217;s win over OU, saying &#8220;Head to head does not matter that much compared to a seasons worth of games. If one game matters that much then a 12 game season is WAY too LONG!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Then you undermine USC&#8217;s claim to superiority by saying, &#8220;A loss is a loss no matter if it is a fluke buy 1 point of 50.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess it depends on how the loss affects OU&#8217;s stature. I wonder how OU&#8217;s head-to-head loss to Florida will be spun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6177</link>
		<dc:creator>rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6177</guid>
		<description>Teams that could be and should not be in the final four of the BCS, before bowl season began: OU - yes. Only loss is to a top 10 team; TU - yes. Only loss is to top 10 team; TTU - yes. Only loss is to a top 10 team; Utah - yes. If they can play in a BCS game, then why not? Boise State - same as Utah; USC- no way. Lost to an unranked team, has no pac-10 championship game; FU - no way. Lost to an unranked team at home. Simply a what if scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teams that could be and should not be in the final four of the BCS, before bowl season began: OU &#8211; yes. Only loss is to a top 10 team; TU &#8211; yes. Only loss is to top 10 team; TTU &#8211; yes. Only loss is to a top 10 team; Utah &#8211; yes. If they can play in a BCS game, then why not? Boise State &#8211; same as Utah; USC- no way. Lost to an unranked team, has no pac-10 championship game; FU &#8211; no way. Lost to an unranked team at home. Simply a what if scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6165</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6165</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand any talk for USC/Texas regarding a split championship.  Utah is the team deserving the talk.  They are the only undefeated team left.  USC lost to Oregon State, Utah beat them.  Although Michigan was down this year, Utah won in the &quot;Big House&quot; to start the season.  Everyone talks about how great the SEC is, Florida barely beat Alabama, Utah thoroughly beat Alabama near their home.  If you still say anything about USC, the MWC was 7-1 against the PAC-10 this year and USC&#039;s bowl win was at home over a team from the Big-10 (1-6 in bowls this year).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand any talk for USC/Texas regarding a split championship.  Utah is the team deserving the talk.  They are the only undefeated team left.  USC lost to Oregon State, Utah beat them.  Although Michigan was down this year, Utah won in the &#8220;Big House&#8221; to start the season.  Everyone talks about how great the SEC is, Florida barely beat Alabama, Utah thoroughly beat Alabama near their home.  If you still say anything about USC, the MWC was 7-1 against the PAC-10 this year and USC&#8217;s bowl win was at home over a team from the Big-10 (1-6 in bowls this year).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6144</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t understand this calling Tech&#039;s win a fluke.  If you will check the stats on that game Tech had nearly 600 yards of offense to UT&#039;s 350.  Tech also had 31 first downs to UT&#039;s 18.  Tech dominated.  It was Texas that almost fot the fluke win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t understand this calling Tech&#8217;s win a fluke.  If you will check the stats on that game Tech had nearly 600 yards of offense to UT&#8217;s 350.  Tech also had 31 first downs to UT&#8217;s 18.  Tech dominated.  It was Texas that almost fot the fluke win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6128</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6128</guid>
		<description>OU will beat Florida on Thursday!!   Texas HAS NO claim to number one at all, but I am glad they beat Ohio State even if they had to score in the last 16 seconds on the game to do so.  Head to head does not matter that much compared to a seasons worth of games.  If one game matters that much then a 12 game season is WAY too LONG!!! Texas non- conference schdeule for next year is TOTALLY AWESOME man, 4-8 UCF, 4-8 Wyoming, 4-8 Louisiana Monroe and powerhouse UTEP at 5-7 and combined 17-31 with NO BOWL games between them.  A loss is a loss no matter if it is a fluke buy 1 point of 50.  USC lost to an UNRANKED team. so they should be totally out of the equation. Even though they are pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OU will beat Florida on Thursday!!   Texas HAS NO claim to number one at all, but I am glad they beat Ohio State even if they had to score in the last 16 seconds on the game to do so.  Head to head does not matter that much compared to a seasons worth of games.  If one game matters that much then a 12 game season is WAY too LONG!!! Texas non- conference schdeule for next year is TOTALLY AWESOME man, 4-8 UCF, 4-8 Wyoming, 4-8 Louisiana Monroe and powerhouse UTEP at 5-7 and combined 17-31 with NO BOWL games between them.  A loss is a loss no matter if it is a fluke buy 1 point of 50.  USC lost to an UNRANKED team. so they should be totally out of the equation. Even though they are pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6097</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/01/06/gators-experienced-on-offense-not-on-defense/#comment-6097</guid>
		<description>Let USC play a game in December or thereafter outside of its backyard or another tropical setting.  Play a championship game in KC in December at night.  I am amazed any team could score 60+ points under frigid conditions.  It was unexpected when OU did it last month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let USC play a game in December or thereafter outside of its backyard or another tropical setting.  Play a championship game in KC in December at night.  I am amazed any team could score 60+ points under frigid conditions.  It was unexpected when OU did it last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

