Movie review: “Twilight”

twilight-bella-and-edward-meado.jpg 

From Friday’s Weekend Look section of The Oklahoman. 3 of 4 stars (I wouldn’t say its as beautiful as Edward’s skin sparkling in the sunlight, but fans should enjoy this faithful adaptation.)

The modestly budgeted film adaptation of “Twilight” doesn’t have quite the bite of Stephenie Meyer’s addictive novels.

But the legions of fervent fans of the phenomenally popular four-book series should be thrilled with the movie, which remains faithful to the first novel without being handcuffed to it.

After her mother remarries and begins traveling with her new husband, awkward teenager Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) reluctantly moves from sunny Phoenix to the small, gloomy town of Forks, Wash., where her dad (Billy Burke) is chief of police.

Bella fits in at her new school better than expected, but she notices that one group doesn’t: The Cullen “family,” five incredibly beautiful and private teenagers all adopted by the youthful Dr. Carlisle Cullen (Peter Facinelli) and his wife Esme (Elizabeth Reaser).

Bella is particularly drawn to Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), though he seems to take an instant and intense dislike to her - until he miraculously saves her from being crushed to death by a runaway van.

She sets out to uncover an explanation for Edward’s superhuman speed and strength, and when her American Indian pal Jacob (Taylor Lautner) tells her the tribal legend of the “cold ones,” the answer clicks. The Cullens are vampires, though they choose to live only on animal blood rather than feeding on humans.

Edward finds himself just as irresistibly drawn to Bella as she is to him, but his craving for her blood, despite his convictions, puts her in constant danger. The risks get bigger when a coven of not-so-refined vampires starts pursuing Bella.

The novel is primarily driven by Bella’s thoughts and conversations with Edward and is written in the earnestly passionate tone of a romance novel, which makes adapting it a challenge. Some of the dialogue and circumstances translate clumsily to film, but director Catherine Hardwicke keeps the story mostly on track. A few events from the book are shifted to keep the plot moving.

Stewart and Pattinson have convincing chemistry as the star-crossed lovers.

The biggest drawbacks are the cheap special effects, which look cheesy and unconvincing, and the relentless soundtrack, which unnecessarily and loudly punctuates every development.

Still, the film should be considered essential viewing for fans of the books, as it keeps the fundamentals of Meyer’s saga intact. And for people who haven’t read them, the movie offers two hours of solid if not exactly groundbreaking entertainment.

-BAM

Categorized under:

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)